- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03080103
Appendectomy Versus Conservative Treatment for Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis (ACTUAA)
A Prospective Non-randomized Controlled, Multicenter, Multidisciplinary Trial Comparing Appendectomy and Conservative Treatment for Patients With Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis (the ACTUAA STUDY).
On September the 15th, 2015, Italian surgeons, radiologists and pathologists with a special interest and expertise in the diagnosis and management of Acute Appendicitis (AA), met up under the auspices of the Italian Society of Hospital Surgeons (ACOI) in Oristano (Italy) to constitute the ACTUAA collaborative working group. The main objectives of the working group are:
To create a working basis for analyzing the diagnostic features, treatment modalities and outcomes of interest of both the antibiotic-first approach and appendectomy for patients with uncomplicated AA.
To investigate the clinical, laboratory and radiologic modalities adopted for the diagnosis To determine the outcomes of patients treated with antibiotics or appendectomy in the short and long term periods.
To compare results according to the type of intervention. To stratify the risk of recurrence for patients treated with antibiotics according to clinical, laboratory and radiology findings.
To evaluate the sensibility and specificity of clinical and laboratory scores for the diagnosis of uncomplicated AA.
To identify a subgroup of patients with uncomplicated AA for whom antibiotic treatment can be highly effective.
General study design The study protocol is designed according to the "SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials".
The study period is estimated to be of 12 month + 12 month of follow-up (with a second session of follow-up following 5-years), beginning on 01/04/2017.
Participants All adult patients (aged over 18 years old) with suspected AA will be admitted to the Surgical Department of the nine participating Italian hospitals, where they will be studied carefully by the on call surgeon.
Patients will be then informed of the study protocol and invited to give written consent for participation and for sensible data collection for scientific purposes.
Subsequently, only patients who will undergo diagnostic imaging (as specified later) and from whom a written informed consent will be obtained, can be enrolled in the study and registered by each Center using a uniform electronic registration form and database.
General characteristics, medical history, clinical findings, physical investigation, and blood tests will be reported in the medical record. Pain will be quantified by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scoring system before administrating any pain medications and after the treatments.
In order to enter the study, patients will have to undergo diagnostic imaging (US and/or CT scan or MRI scan) and only the diagnosis of uncomplicated AA confirmed by diagnostic imaging will permit patient enrollment in the study.
Specific aims of the ACTUAA Study The objective of this prospective non-randomized controlled, multicenter, multidisciplinary trial is to compare the antibiotic therapy and emergency appendectomy for the treatment of patients with uncomplicated AA(without abscess or free perforation), confirmed by US and/or CT or MRI scan. No changes in the daily practice regarding the diagnostic, clinical and treatment pathways will be required to the participating centers. However, only the patients with uncomplicated AA, confirmed by one of the above mentioned radiologic tools will be enrolled in the study. The decision on which of the tools are to be adopted will be up to the local lead surgeon.
Primary Outcome Measure:
Number of participants with complication-free treatment success, defined as success of the initial treatment with uncomplicated course.
Secondary Outcome Measures:
Length of hospital stay; Pain evaluation; Time to return to normal activity; Period of sick-leave; Complicated appendicitis with peritonitis identified at the time of surgical operation; Quality of life as assessed by the Short Form 12-scale (SF-12)
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Cagliari, Italy, 09042
- General and Endocrine Surgical Unit, Cagliari University Hospital, Cagliari
-
Cagliari, Italy, 09121
- General Surgery, Santissima Trinità Hospital
-
Napoli, Italy, 80147
- Emergency Surgery Unit, Villa Betania Evangelic Hospital, Napoli
-
Nuoro, Italy, 08100
- General, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, San Francesco Hospital
-
-
Cagliari
-
Muravera, Cagliari, Italy, 09043
- General and Emergency Surgery Unit, San Marcellino Hospital
-
-
Italt
-
Rome, Italt, Italy
- Department of General Surgery, San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital
-
-
Ogliastra
-
Lanusei, Ogliastra, Italy, 08045
- General Surgery Unit, Nostra Signora Della Mercede Hospita, Lanusei
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Signed informed consent
- Age over 18 years
- Uncomplicated AA confirmed by US and/or CT or MRI scan.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnancy or lactating
- Diffuse peritonitis at physical examination
- Serious systemic illness
- Positive anamnesis for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Patients submitted to appendectomy as first-line treatment
Open or Laparoscopic Appendectomy The assignment of each patient to either the "antibiotic-first management" arm or the "immediate surgery" arm, will be non-randomized and decided independently by the Staff Specialist Surgeon on Call, upon careful assessment of AIR score, laboratory findings and imaging.
The decision of the management pathway will not be influenced in any case by the participation of the patient in the study, and the assignment of the treatment will be decided by the consultant surgeon according to current good surgical practice and standard practice patterns in Italy.
|
Laparoscopic three-port or single-port appendectomy; or conventional McBurney laparotomic appendectomy; or open appendectomy performed through midline incision
|
|
Patients treated with antibiotic-first strategy
Antibiotic therapy.maging.
Patients managed conservatively will receive one of the following parenteral antibiotic treatments: Piperacillin/Tazobactam (4.5 g) three intravenous administration per day; Ceftriaxone (2 g) once per day or Ciprofloxacin (500 mg) twice per day plus Metronidazole (500 mg) three times per day; Amoxicillin/Clavulanic acid (2 g) four times per day for a length depending on the clinical conditions; Ertapenem (1 g) one administration per day for three days.
Patients were discharged with oral antibiotics (amoxicillin/clavulanic acid or ciprofloxacin) for at least four days.
|
Patients treated with antibiotics as first-line approach
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of participants with complication-free treatment success, as assessed by the Dindo-Clavien Scale.
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Number of participants with complication-free treatment success, defined as success of the initial treatment with uncomplicated course: no postoperative complications, adverse events, or treatment failure occurring, as assessed by the Dindo-Clavien Classification.
Post-treatment abdominal abscess, bowel occlusion, incisional hernia, pulmonary embolism, cardio-vascular complications, surgical site infection, complications due to anesthesia, adverse reactions to antibiotics.
Complications are analyzed both for patients submitted to appendectomy and for those treated with surgery as second line approach, after primary antibiotic treatment failure.
For patients treated with antibiotics, treatment failure (persistency and recurrence rates of acute appendicitis) will be evaluated within the overall-complications rate.
Specific sub-analyses of the complications will be carried out.
|
1 year
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: 1 week
|
Length of post-operative hospital stay for patients submitted to appendectomy; length of hospital stay for patients treated with antibiotics
|
1 week
|
|
VAS-Score
Time Frame: 1 month
|
Pain evaluation performed through the visual analogue scale both for patients who undergo an appendectomy and for those treated with antibiotics
|
1 month
|
|
Time to return to normal activity
Time Frame: 1 month
|
Time to return to normal activity both for patients who undergo an appendectomy and for those treated with antibiotics
|
1 month
|
|
Period of sick-leave
Time Frame: 1 month
|
Period of sick-leave, intended as "absence from work"
|
1 month
|
|
Complicated appendicitis with peritonitis identified at the time of surgical operation.
Time Frame: 1 year
|
In the antibiotic group the analysis will be carried out within the cohort of patients who will undergo appendectomy after the failure of the antibiotic therapy in order to assess whether or not a major risk of perforated appendicitis exists for patients who will be treated firstly with antibiotics.
|
1 year
|
|
Quality of life as assessed by the Short Form 12-scale (SF-12)
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Quality of life estimated by the Short Form 12-scale (SF-12)
|
1 year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Study Director: Mauro Podda, M.D., Associazione dei Chirurghi Ospedalieri Italiani ACOI; General Surgeon, San Francesco Hospital. Nuoro (Italy)
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.
- Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Gotzsche PC, Altman DG, Mann H, Berlin JA, Dickersin K, Hrobjartsson A, Schulz KF, Parulekar WR, Krleza-Jeric K, Laupacis A, Moher D. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ. 2013 Jan 8;346:e7586. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7586.
- Sartelli M, Catena F, Ansaloni L, Coccolini F, Griffiths EA, Abu-Zidan FM, Di Saverio S, Ulrych J, Kluger Y, Ben-Ishay O, Moore FA, Ivatury RR, Coimbra R, Peitzman AB, Leppaniemi A, Fraga GP, Maier RV, Chiara O, Kashuk J, Sakakushev B, Weber DG, Latifi R, Biffl W, Bala M, Karamarkovic A, Inaba K, Ordonez CA, Hecker A, Augustin G, Demetrashvili Z, Melo RB, Marwah S, Zachariah SK, Shelat VG, McFarlane M, Rems M, Gomes CA, Faro MP, Junior GA, Negoi I, Cui Y, Sato N, Vereczkei A, Bellanova G, Birindelli A, Di Carlo I, Kok KY, Gachabayov M, Gkiokas G, Bouliaris K, Colak E, Isik A, Rios-Cruz D, Soto R, Moore EE. WSES Guidelines for the management of acute left sided colonic diverticulitis in the emergency setting. World J Emerg Surg. 2016 Jul 29;11:37. doi: 10.1186/s13017-016-0095-0. eCollection 2016.
- DeFrances CJ, Hall MJ. 2002 National Hospital Discharge Survey. Adv Data. 2004 May 21;(342):1-29.
- Livingston EH, Woodward WA, Sarosi GA, Haley RW. Disconnect between incidence of nonperforated and perforated appendicitis: implications for pathophysiology and management. Ann Surg. 2007 Jun;245(6):886-92. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000256391.05233.aa.
- Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 1990 Nov;132(5):910-25. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115734.
- Di Saverio S, Birindelli A, Kelly MD, Catena F, Weber DG, Sartelli M, Sugrue M, De Moya M, Gomes CA, Bhangu A, Agresta F, Moore EE, Soreide K, Griffiths E, De Castro S, Kashuk J, Kluger Y, Leppaniemi A, Ansaloni L, Andersson M, Coccolini F, Coimbra R, Gurusamy KS, Campanile FC, Biffl W, Chiara O, Moore F, Peitzman AB, Fraga GP, Costa D, Maier RV, Rizoli S, Balogh ZJ, Bendinelli C, Cirocchi R, Tonini V, Piccinini A, Tugnoli G, Jovine E, Persiani R, Biondi A, Scalea T, Stahel P, Ivatury R, Velmahos G, Andersson R. WSES Jerusalem guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis. World J Emerg Surg. 2016 Jul 18;11:34. doi: 10.1186/s13017-016-0090-5. eCollection 2016.
- Agresta F, Campanile FC, Podda M, Cillara N, Pernazza G, Giaccaglia V, Ciccoritti L, Ioia G, Mandala S, La Barbera C, Birindelli A, Sartelli M, Di Saverio S; Joined Italian Surgical Societies Working Group. Current status of laparoscopy for acute abdomen in Italy: a critical appraisal of 2012 clinical guidelines from two consecutive nationwide surveys with analysis of 271,323 cases over 5 years. Surg Endosc. 2017 Apr;31(4):1785-1795. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5175-4. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
- Katkhouda N, Mason RJ, Towfigh S, Gevorgyan A, Essani R. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind study. Ann Surg. 2005 Sep;242(3):439-48; discussion 448-50. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000179648.75373.2f.
- Di Saverio S, Sartelli M, Catena F, Birindelli A, Tugnoli G. Renewed Interest in Acute Appendicitis: Are Antibiotics Non-Inferior to Surgery or Possibly Clinically Superior? What Is Long-Term Follow-Up and Natural Evolution of Appendicitis Treated Conservatively with "Antibiotics First"? Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2016 Jun;17(3):376-7. doi: 10.1089/sur.2015.206. Epub 2016 Feb 26. No abstract available.
- Liu K, Fogg L. Use of antibiotics alone for treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgery. 2011 Oct;150(4):673-83. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.08.018.
- Nakhamiyayev V, Galldin L, Chiarello M, Lumba A, Gorecki PJ. Laparoscopic appendectomy is the preferred approach for appendicitis: a retrospective review of two practice patterns. Surg Endosc. 2010 Apr;24(4):859-64. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0678-x.
- Flum DR, Koepsell T. The clinical and economic correlates of misdiagnosed appendicitis: nationwide analysis. Arch Surg. 2002 Jul;137(7):799-804; discussion 804. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.137.7.799.
- Styrud J, Eriksson S, Nilsson I, Ahlberg G, Haapaniemi S, Neovius G, Rex L, Badume I, Granstrom L. Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment in acute appendicitis. a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial. World J Surg. 2006 Jun;30(6):1033-7. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-0304-6.
- Turhan AN, Kapan S, Kutukcu E, Yigitbas H, Hatipoglu S, Aygun E. Comparison of operative and non operative management of acute appendicitis. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2009 Sep;15(5):459-62.
- Vons C, Barry C, Maitre S, Pautrat K, Leconte M, Costaglioli B, Karoui M, Alves A, Dousset B, Valleur P, Falissard B, Franco D. Amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid versus appendicectomy for treatment of acute uncomplicated appendicitis: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011 May 7;377(9777):1573-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60410-8.
- Podda M, Cillara N, Di Saverio S, Lai A, Feroci F, Luridiana G, Agresta F, Vettoretto N; ACOI (Italian Society of Hospital Surgeons) Study Group on Acute Appendicitis. Antibiotics-first strategy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis in adults is associated with increased rates of peritonitis at surgery. A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing appendectomy and non-operative management with antibiotics. Surgeon. 2017 Oct;15(5):303-314. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2017.02.001. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
- Wilms IM, de Hoog DE, de Visser DC, Janzing HM. Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment for acute appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Nov 9;(11):CD008359. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008359.pub2.
- Findlay JM, Kafsi JE, Hammer C, Gilmour J, Gillies RS, Maynard ND. Nonoperative Management of Appendicitis in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Dec;223(6):814-824.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.09.005. Epub 2016 Oct 26. No abstract available.
- Salminen P, Paajanen H, Rautio T, Nordstrom P, Aarnio M, Rantanen T, Tuominen R, Hurme S, Virtanen J, Mecklin JP, Sand J, Jartti A, Rinta-Kiikka I, Gronroos JM. Antibiotic Therapy vs Appendectomy for Treatment of Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis: The APPAC Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2015 Jun 16;313(23):2340-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.6154.
- Harnoss JC, Zelienka I, Probst P, Grummich K, Muller-Lantzsch C, Harnoss JM, Ulrich A, Buchler MW, Diener MK. Antibiotics Versus Surgical Therapy for Uncomplicated Appendicitis: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Controlled Trials (PROSPERO 2015: CRD42015016882). Ann Surg. 2017 May;265(5):889-900. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002039.
- Andersson M, Andersson RE. The appendicitis inflammatory response score: a tool for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis that outperforms the Alvarado score. World J Surg. 2008 Aug;32(8):1843-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9649-y. Erratum In: World J Surg. 2012 Sep;36(9):2269-70.
- Eriksson S, Granstrom L. Randomized controlled trial of appendicectomy versus antibiotic therapy for acute appendicitis. Br J Surg. 1995 Feb;82(2):166-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800820207.
- Hansson J, Korner U, Khorram-Manesh A, Solberg A, Lundholm K. Randomized clinical trial of antibiotic therapy versus appendicectomy as primary treatment of acute appendicitis in unselected patients. Br J Surg. 2009 May;96(5):473-81. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6482. Erratum In: Br J Surg. 2009 Jul;96(7):830.
- Gregory S, Kuntz K, Sainfort F, Kharbanda A. Cost-Effectiveness of Integrating a Clinical Decision Rule and Staged Imaging Protocol for Diagnosis of Appendicitis. Value Health. 2016 Jan;19(1):28-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.10.007. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
- Sammalkorpi HE, Mentula P, Leppaniemi A. A new adult appendicitis score improves diagnostic accuracy of acute appendicitis--a prospective study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2014 Jun 26;14:114. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-14-114.
- Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, Mostafavi AA, McCabe CJ. Effect of computed tomography of the appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospital resources. N Engl J Med. 1998 Jan 15;338(3):141-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199801153380301.
- van Randen A, Lameris W, van Es HW, van Heesewijk HP, van Ramshorst B, Ten Hove W, Bouma WH, van Leeuwen MS, van Keulen EM, Bossuyt PM, Stoker J, Boermeester MA; OPTIMA Study Group. A comparison of the accuracy of ultrasound and computed tomography in common diagnoses causing acute abdominal pain. Eur Radiol. 2011 Jul;21(7):1535-45. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2087-5. Epub 2011 Mar 2.
- Humes DJ, Simpson J. Acute appendicitis. BMJ. 2006 Sep 9;333(7567):530-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38940.664363.AE. No abstract available.
- Jones RP, Jeffrey RB, Shah BR, Desser TS, Rosenberg J, Olcott EW. Journal Club: the Alvarado score as a method for reducing the number of CT studies when appendiceal ultrasound fails to visualize the appendix in adults. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Mar;204(3):519-26. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.12864.
- Lameris W, van Randen A, van Es HW, van Heesewijk JP, van Ramshorst B, Bouma WH, ten Hove W, van Leeuwen MS, van Keulen EM, Dijkgraaf MG, Bossuyt PM, Boermeester MA, Stoker J; OPTIMA study group. Imaging strategies for detection of urgent conditions in patients with acute abdominal pain: diagnostic accuracy study. BMJ. 2009 Jun 26;338:b2431. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2431.
- Krishnamoorthi R, Ramarajan N, Wang NE, Newman B, Rubesova E, Mueller CM, Barth RA. Effectiveness of a staged US and CT protocol for the diagnosis of pediatric appendicitis: reducing radiation exposure in the age of ALARA. Radiology. 2011 Apr;259(1):231-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10100984. Epub 2011 Jan 28.
- Nielsen JW, Boomer L, Kurtovic K, Lee E, Kupzyk K, Mallory R, Adler B, Bates DG, Kenney B. Reducing computed tomography scans for appendicitis by introduction of a standardized and validated ultrasonography report template. J Pediatr Surg. 2015 Jan;50(1):144-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.10.033. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
- Aspelund G, Fingeret A, Gross E, Kessler D, Keung C, Thirumoorthi A, Oh PS, Behr G, Chen S, Lampl B, Middlesworth W, Kandel J, Ruzal-Shapiro C. Ultrasonography/MRI versus CT for diagnosing appendicitis. Pediatrics. 2014 Apr;133(4):586-93. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-2128. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
- Rettenbacher T, Hollerweger A, Macheiner P, Rettenbacher L, Frass R, Schneider B, Gritzmann N. Presence or absence of gas in the appendix: additional criteria to rule out or confirm acute appendicitis--evaluation with US. Radiology. 2000 Jan;214(1):183-7. doi: 10.1148/radiology.214.1.r00ja20183.
- Mostbeck G, Adam EJ, Nielsen MB, Claudon M, Clevert D, Nicolau C, Nyhsen C, Owens CM. How to diagnose acute appendicitis: ultrasound first. Insights Imaging. 2016 Apr;7(2):255-63. doi: 10.1007/s13244-016-0469-6. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
- Quigley AJ, Stafrace S. Ultrasound assessment of acute appendicitis in paediatric patients: methodology and pictorial overview of findings seen. Insights Imaging. 2013 Dec;4(6):741-51. doi: 10.1007/s13244-013-0275-3. Epub 2013 Aug 31.
- Birnbaum BA, Wilson SR. Appendicitis at the millennium. Radiology. 2000 May;215(2):337-48. doi: 10.1148/radiology.215.2.r00ma24337.
- Incesu L, Yazicioglu AK, Selcuk MB, Ozen N. Contrast-enhanced power Doppler US in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Eur J Radiol. 2004 May;50(2):201-9. doi: 10.1016/S0720-048X(03)00102-5.
- Shogilev DJ, Duus N, Odom SR, Shapiro NI. Diagnosing appendicitis: evidence-based review of the diagnostic approach in 2014. West J Emerg Med. 2014 Nov;15(7):859-71. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2014.9.21568. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
- Karul M, Berliner C, Keller S, Tsui TY, Yamamura J. Imaging of appendicitis in adults. Rofo. 2014 Jun;186(6):551-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1366074. Epub 2014 Apr 23.
- Bixby SD, Lucey BC, Soto JA, Theysohn JM, Ozonoff A, Varghese JC. Perforated versus nonperforated acute appendicitis: accuracy of multidetector CT detection. Radiology. 2006 Dec;241(3):780-6. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2413051896. Erratum In: Radiology. 2007 Apr;243(1):302. Theyson, Jens M [corrected to Theysohn, Jens M].
- Ramdass MJ, Young Sing Q, Milne D, Mooteeram J, Barrow S. Association between the appendix and the fecalith in adults. Can J Surg. 2015 Feb;58(1):10-4. doi: 10.1503/cjs.002014.
- Podda M, Poillucci G, Pacella D, Mortola L, Canfora A, Aresu S, Pisano M, Erdas E, Pisanu A, Cillara N; ACTUAA Study Collaborative Working Group. Appendectomy versus conservative treatment with antibiotics for patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis: a propensity score-matched analysis of patient-centered outcomes (the ACTUAA prospective multicenter trial). Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Mar;36(3):589-598. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-03843-8. Epub 2021 Jan 17. Erratum In: Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Jan 28;:
- Podda M, Serventi F, Mortola L, Marini S, Sirigu D, Piga M, Pisano M, Coppola M, Agresta F, Virdis F, Di Saverio S, Cillara N; ACTUAA Study Collaborative Working Group. A prospective non-randomized controlled, multicenter trial comparing Appendectomy and Conservative Treatment for Patients with Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis (the ACTUAA study). Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Nov;32(11):1649-1660. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2878-5. Epub 2017 Aug 15.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- No ID (Other Grant/Funding Number: Smartee)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Acute Appendicitis
-
North Estonia Medical CentreTartu University HospitalRecruitingAcute Appendicitis | Appendicitis Acute | Appendicitis Perforated | Acute Appendicitis With Rupture | Appendicitis; Perforation | Acute Appendicitis Without Peritonitis | Acute Appendicitis With Appendix AbscessEstonia
-
University College, LondonCompletedAcute Appendicitis | Acute Appendicitis With RuptureUnited Kingdom
-
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical UniversityCompletedAcute Appendicitis | Acute Appendicitis With Rupture | Acute Appendicitis Without Peritonitis | Acute Appendicitis With PeritonitisRussian Federation
-
Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam UniversityElazıg Fethi Sekin Sehir HastanesiCompletedThe Role of Preoperative HALP Score in Differentiating Complicated Acute Appendicitis (Appendicitis)Acute Appendicitis | Acute Appendicitis With Rupture | Acute Appendicitis Without Peritonitis | Acute Appendicitis With Appendix AbscessTurkey
-
University Hospital, ToulouseNot yet recruitingAcute Uncomplicated AppendicitisFrance
-
Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterRecruitingAppendicitis Acute | Appendicitis Perforated | Appendicitis With Perforation | Appendicitis Suppurative | Appendicitis GangrenousUnited States
-
Fundación Pública Andaluza para la gestión de la...RecruitingAppendicitis Acute | Gangrenous AppendicitisSpain
-
HJ23Hospital Universitari Joan XXIII de Tarragona.Not yet recruitingAcute Appendicitis | Appendicitis Perforated | Appendicitis Suppurative
-
Turku University HospitalOulu University Hospital; Kuopio University Hospital; Seinajoki Central Hospital and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingUncomplicated Acute AppendicitisFinland
-
Hospital Universitario Virgen de la ArrixacaUnknownUncomplicated Acute AppendicitisSpain
Clinical Trials on Laparoscopic or Open appendectomy
-
The Hospital for Sick ChildrenTerminated
-
Far Eastern Memorial HospitalUnknown
-
Oregon Health and Science UniversityChildren's Hospital Los AngelesCompleted
-
Hanoi Medical UniversityCompleted
-
Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam UniversityElazıg Fethi Sekin Sehir HastanesiCompletedThe Role of Preoperative HALP Score in Differentiating Complicated Acute Appendicitis (Appendicitis)Acute Appendicitis | Acute Appendicitis With Rupture | Acute Appendicitis Without Peritonitis | Acute Appendicitis With Appendix AbscessTurkey
-
Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Research and Training HospitalCompleted
-
Destinval ChristelleCompletedPostoperative Pain | Laparoscopy | Acute Appendicitis | Peritonitis; AcuteFrance
-
Maxima Medical CenterCompletedChronic or Recurrent Appendicitis