PALLiON - PALLiative Care In ONcology (PALLiON)

March 23, 2023 updated by: Marianne Jensen Hjermstad, Oslo University Hospital

PALLiON - PALLiative Care In ONcology - a Cluster-randomized Trial to Improve the Care for Cancer Patients With a Short Life Expectancy

A major concern in today's oncology is the complexity of treatment that increases costs. A main contributor is the increasing use of chemo- and radiotherapy during end of life (EoL: the last 12 months of life). Importantly, intensive chemotherapy in EoL has uncertain efficacy, may result in frequent hospitalizations and less time spent at home. Also, patients with incurable disease who receive intensive treatment at EoL have worse quality of life (QoL). A systematic palliative care (PC) approach that focuses on optimal symptom management and maintenance of QoL of patients and family is often introduced too late in the disease trajectory. Studies indicate that early introduction of PC in patients with unfavorable prognosis may improve QoL and other symptoms and prolong survival. These and related findings have made international stakeholders advocate a stronger integration of oncology and PC for patients with incurable cancer.

The present project is a national multicenter cluster-randomized trial (RCT) in 12 oncology departments in all 4 Norwegian health regions. The project tests the efficacy of a complex tripod intervention that integrates oncology and PC for cancer patients with a life-expectancy <12 months who receive chemotherapy and includes: A) systematic electronic assessment of symptoms, B) implementation of standardized care pathways and C) an education program for oncologists/PC physicians. The PC pathway focuses on the patient's journey through the PC trajectory including EoL care in order to improve quality of care and reduce the variability in clinical practice and costs. The intervention aims at empowering physicians, patients and relatives and promoting shared-decision-making.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patients with incurable disease who receive intensive treatment at EoL have worse quality of life (QoL) compared with those receiving symptomatic treatment. Also, a PC approach at an early stage in patients with unfavorable prognosis may improve patients' QoL and symptom control, may lead to prolonged survival and give patients and caregivers a more realistic perspective on the disease and prognosis. Further, there is documentation that caregivers of patients with advanced cancer are generally more satisfied and report less depressive symptoms with an early introduction of PC.

These and related findings in the wake of a study (NEJM 2010) initiated the current debate and have made international stakeholders advocate a stronger integration of oncology and PC for patients with incurable cancer. Despite a rapid development of PC services during the last 15-20 years, there is still a distinct separation between oncology and PC in Norway as in other Western countries. This infers that the potential for optimal care during the last phase of life for those patients has not been fully explored, despite the documented advantages for both patients and caregivers. However, results from studies on integration of oncology and PC from other countries e.g. the USA, may not be directly transferable to Norway, given the different health care organizations, reimbursement issues and the different indications for and the high degree of hospice use.

Information given to cancer patients and caregivers about the disease and its treatment is important at all stages of disease, and is crucial in relation to PC in order to facilitate shared decision making, and improve satisfaction with care, patients' sense of control, QoL and communication with patient and caregivers. As PC also aims to improve the QoL of caregivers waiting to include caregivers until patients are in their last weeks or days of life may not adequately address patient or caregiver distress. Further, the benefits of early integration of PC on caregiver's distress and QoL remain inconclusive.

Thus, the overall aim of PALLiON is to improve the quality and efficacy of cancer care by implementing an early integration of oncology and PC in patients with advanced cancer who receive chemotherapy. The long-term objective is a change of today's oncology practice. Today, the method of referral to PC is most often based on care needs in contrast to referrals based on diagnosis and prognosis used in the RCTs that have documented favorable results. As we know that the timing of referral is important to optimize the benefits of PC, we aim to change this practice.

The implementation method in PALLiON is a complex intervention consisting of a) a structured educational program for oncologists, palliative care physicians and nurses, b) standardized care pathways with a systematic integration of oncology and palliative care for each of the included cancer diagnoses, and c) systematic use of Eir - an electronic assessment tool for patient-reported outcomes (PROMs), in the standardized care pathways, combined with evidence-based treatment recommendations in the clinical consultations.

The design makes it possible to evaluate the effect of an early integration of oncology and PC at the institutional and patient levels between the intervention and control arms. Further, a potential effect of the intervention at each of the centers in the intervention arm can be evaluated by comparing the post-intervention data with historical data e.g. on use of chemotherapy, number of re-admissions / emergency admissions in the very last stages of life as appropriate.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

659

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bodø, Norway
        • Nordland Hospital Trust
      • Fredrikstad, Norway, 1714
        • Østfold Hospital Trust
      • Førde, Norway
        • Førde Hospital Trust
      • Kristiansand, Norway
        • Sørlandet Hospital Trust
      • Oslo, Norway
        • Oslo University Hospital
      • Oslo, Norway
        • Akershus University Hospital
      • Skien, Norway
        • Telemark Hospital Trust
      • Stavanger, Norway
        • Stavanger University Hospital
      • Trondheim, Norway, 0730
        • Norwegian University of Science and Technology
      • Tønsberg, Norway
        • Vestfold Hospital trust
      • Ålesund, Norway
        • Ålesund Hospital Trust
    • Troms
      • Tromsø, Troms, Norway, 9019
        • University Hospital of North Norway

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • A verified metastatic or locally advanced cancer of the upper GI tract, lower GI tract, pancreas, liver, breast, bladder, prostate, kidney, cholangiocarcinoma, or malignant melanoma
  • Defined as a palliative care patient, with expected life expectancy of <12 months
  • Scheduled to start what is perceived as last line of chemotherapy (definition: tumor directed medical therapy)

    o Observe: different time points for inclusion and line of treatment apply for the specific diagnoses

  • Age > 18 years
  • Fluency in written and oral Norwegian
  • Physically and cognitively able to provide written informed consent, based on clinical judgment
  • Scheduled to receive all oncological and specialized palliative treatment at the participating hospital
  • World Health Organization (WHO) performance status 0-2

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any serious psychiatric diagnosis (e.g. psychotic, bipolar disorder), substance abuse or cognitive impairment as judged by standard clinical criteria (disturbed consciousness, disorientation to time/place and attention deficits) at the discretion of the attending physician that precludes completion of PROs
  • A cancer diagnosis other than the ones above
  • Multiple malignancies
  • Serious substance abuse
  • Already included in a palliative care program

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control arm
Usual care
Experimental: Intervention arm
Educational program Standardized care pathways Early palliative care
E-learning lectures, group exercises, skills training
Pathways for systematic follow-up
Compulsory referral to palliative care at inclusion

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Use of chemotherapy
Time Frame: 3 months before death
Number of patients who receive chemotherapy during their last 3 months of life
3 months before death

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Initiation and discontinuation of chemotherapy
Time Frame: 3 months before death
Number of patients who start and discontinue chemo, and number of cycles
3 months before death
Use of artificial nutrition
Time Frame: 1 month before death
Number of patients who receive artificial nutrition during their last month of life
1 month before death
Use of concomitant medication
Time Frame: 1 month before death
Number of patients who receive concomitant medication during their last month of life
1 month before death

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jon H Loge, PhD, Professor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 22, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 30, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

March 23, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 24, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 23, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

If desired, other collaborators may use data collected at their own institution. However, this is subject to approval from the study scientific committee, and only applies after publication of the main study publication

IPD Sharing Time Frame

end 2019

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

co-authorship use of own data for quality assurance / publications

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neoplasia Prostate

Clinical Trials on Educational program

3
Subscribe