- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03089255
Assessment of the Impact of TIP Score on Thromboprophylaxis in Patients With Non-surgical Lower Leg Trauma. (EvaTIP)
Prospective Study to Assess the Foreseeable Impact of TIP Score on Thromboprophylaxis in Patients With Isolated Non-surgical Lower Limb Trauma Compared to the Physicians' Judgment in Standard Practice.
Traumatic lesions are the leading causes of admission to the emergency center (39%), isolated non-surgical lower limbs trauma are in the foreground. Two recent meta-analyzes suggest the value of Low Molecular Weight Heparins (LMWH) which would reduce symptomatic Thromboembolism Events (TE) in patients with lower limb trauma. However, many recent studies conclude to the need of stratifying the TE risk according to the patient and the nature of his trauma to obtain an individualized therapeutic decision.
The retrospectively established L-TRIP (cast) score allows stratification of the risk without taking into account the type of trauma. The TIP score (Trauma, Immobilization and Patient) was established by consensus of international experts via the Delphi method.
We suggest that the application of the TIP score to rationalize indications of thromboprophylaxis in patients with isolated non-surgical trauma of a lower limb should reduce the rate of anticoagulation prescription without increasing the risk of symptomatic thromboembolic complications with a direct benefit for patients and medico-economic for the society.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
All patients admitted to the Emergency Departments for a nonsurgical isolated lower limb trauma necessitating rigid or semi-rigid immobilization, will be assessed for possible participation.
After the physicians had obtained the no-opposition of the patient, they will fill a questionnaire. This questionnaire includes the treatment chosen by the physician, the type of trauma, the type of immobilization chosen, and the patient's thromboembolic risk factors in order to calculate the TIP and L-TRIP (cast) scores retrospectively.
Phone follow-up will occur within 3 months to gather clinical event data (any signs of VTE, any bleeding events).
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Angers, France, 49000
- Douillet
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Consultation in one of the emergency departments of the participating centres
- Isolated unilateral lower limb injury not requiring surgery
- Lower limb rigid or semi-rigid orthopedic immobilization (i.e. brace of plaster cast) for at least 5 days.
- Full insurance cover
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any anticoagulant or antiplatelet treatment prior to trauma
- Contra-indication to fondaparinux or LMWH
- Factors rendering 3-month follow-up impossible
- Imprisonment
- Inability to provide informed consent
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Rate of prescriptions of prophylactic anticoagulation if TIP score was applied compared to the physicians' judgment in standard practice.
Time Frame: one day
|
Compare two rate (percent) of prescription: obtained with standard practice and with the foreseeable TIP score calculated retrospectively. Score TIP is calculated retrospectively based on datas of the patients included. A threshold value is established by an expert consensus. A score is positive if it is higher than the threshold value, and negative if it is lower or equal to the threshold value. We consider that patients with a negative score would not have been treated by a prophylactic anticoagulation if the TIP score was applied. |
one day
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Rate of prescriptions of prophylactic anticoagulation if L-TRIP(cast) score was applied compared to the physicians' judgment in standard practice.
Time Frame: one day
|
Compare two rate (percent) of prescription: obtained with standard practice and with the foreseeable L-TRIP(cast) score calculated retrospectively. A score is positive if it is higher than the threshold value, and negative if it is lower or equal to the threshold value. We consider that patients with a negative score would not have been treated by a prophylactic anticoagulation if the TIP score was applied. |
one day
|
|
The cumulative rate of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (i.e. deep venous thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism) at 3 months from inclusion.
Time Frame: 3 months
|
The following definitions are applied to confirm a suspected episode of symptomatic :
|
3 months
|
|
The 3-month rate of major bleeding and of non-major clinically relevant bleeding according to the ISTH definition.
Time Frame: 3 months
|
The safety endpoint is major bleeding, defined according to the recently published guidelines of the ISTH :
The cumulative incidence of non-major clinically relevant bleeding. The cumulative incidence of minor bleeding. |
3 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Roy Pierre-Marie, MD, PhD, University Hospital, Angers
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2017-A00291-52
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pulmonary Embolism
-
Hospital Queen Elizabeth, MalaysiaUniversiti Sultan Zainal AbidinCompletedPulmonary Embolism (PE) | Pulmonary Artery EmbolismMalaysia
-
Sahlgrenska University HospitalGothia Forum - Center for Clinical TrialRecruitingPulmonary Embolism (PE) | Pulmonary Embolism With Acute Cor Pulmonale | Pulmonary Embolism With Right Ventricle Enlargement | Pulmonary Embolism Acute | Pulmonary Embolism (Diagnosis)Sweden
-
University of Sao Paulo General HospitalRecruitingPulmonary Embolism and Thrombosis | Pulmonary ThromboendarterectomyBrazil
-
Boston Scientific CorporationEKOS CorporationCompletedPulmonary Embolism | Acute Pulmonary Embolism | Pulmonary Thromboembolism | Massive Pulmonary Embolism | Sub-massive Pulmonary EmbolismUnited States
-
University of Sao Paulo General HospitalRecruitingPulmonary Hypertension | Pulmonary ThromboembolismsBrazil
-
Sohag UniversityNot yet recruitingAcute Pulmonary Embolism
-
National Medical Research Center for Cardiology...RecruitingPulmonary Embolism (PE)Russia
-
Angiodynamics, Inc.Recruiting
-
Inari MedicalCompletedPulmonary Embolism | Submassive Pulmonary Embolism | Acute Pulmonary Embolism | Massive Pulmonary EmbolismUnited States
-
Massachusetts General HospitalNot yet recruitingPulmonary Embolism Acute | Pulmonary Embolism (Diagnosis)United States