The HOMBRE Trial: Comparing Two Innovative Approaches to Reduce Chronic Disease Risk Among Latino Men (HOMBRE)

October 19, 2021 updated by: Palo Alto Medical Foundation
The purpose of this study is to test a flexible lifestyle program designed to help Latino men make healthy lifestyle changes to lower their risk of developing diabetes and heart disease. The program is called HOMBRE (Hombres con Opciones para Mejorar el Bienestar y bajar el Riesgo de Enfermedades crónicas; English translation: Men with choices to improve well being and decrease chronic disease risk).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study is a comparative effectiveness trial where obese Latino men will receive, by random assignment, the HOMBRE intervention or a minimal intensity intervention.

The study is designed to test whether a flexible lifestyle program with choices for program engagement will lead to better health outcomes, compared to a minimal intensity self-directed lifestyle program. If proven successful, this study has the potential to significantly impact health outcomes that matter to Latino men through the innovative design of lifestyle interventions to prevent chronic disease.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

424

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Palo Alto, California, United States, 94301
        • Palo Alto Medical Foundation

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Latino of any race
  • BMI >27 kg/m2
  • One or more metabolic syndrome component (high triglycerides, blood pressure, fasting glucose, central obesity, or low HDL cholesterol)
  • Primary Care Physician approval of patient study contact
  • Able and willing to enroll and provide informed consent, i.e., to meet the time and data collection requirements of the study, be randomized to one of tow study arms, participate in follow-up for 18 months, and authorize the extraction of relevant information form the Electronic Health Record.

Exclusion Criteria:

Medical exclusions:

  • Previous diagnosis of diabetes or diabetes diagnosed as a result of fasting blood glucose or hemoglobin A1c levels obtained through study screening;
  • Diagnosis of cancer (other than non-melanoma skin cancer) that is/was active or treated with radiation or chemotherapy within the past 2 years;
  • Inability to walk without the assistance of another person;
  • Severe medical co-morbidities that require aggressive treatment: e.g., stage 4 or greater renal disease, class III or greater heart failure, unstable coronary artery disease, liver or renal failure;
  • Diagnosis of a terminal illness and/or in hospice care;
  • Diagnosis of bipolar disorder or psychotic disorder within the last 2 years, or currently taking a mood stabilizer or antipsychotic medication
  • Initiation or change in type or dosing of antidepressant medications within 2 months prior to enrollment (The patient will be re-contacted for a later cohort once his/her regimen has been stable for at least 2 months unless the person declines to participate altogether.)
  • Have had or plan to undergo bariatric surgery during the study period

Other exclusions:

  • Having no reliable telephone service
  • Plan to move out of the area during the study period
  • Family/household member of another study participant or of a study staff member
  • Investigator discretion for clinical safety or protocol adherence reasons

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Minimal intensity intervention
Patients assigned to this group will received the Minimal intensity intervention.
The minimal intensity intervention control includes the Group Lifestyle Balance (GLB) videos (DVD or online), standardized messages, and access to a lifestyle coach if initiated by the participant.
EXPERIMENTAL: HOMBRE
Patients assigned to this group will receive the HOMBRE intervention
HOMBRE is a Group Lifestyle Balance (GLB)-based intervention tailored for men and available in 3 delivery modalities (coach-facilitated individual approach, coach-led online virtual groups, and coach-led in-person groups). A lifestyle coach will support men in making an informed choice of modality and will provide ongoing individualized feedback. All delivery modalities provide the same evidence-based curriculum and include self-monitoring and individualized feedback from the lifestyle coach.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number and Percentage of Men Achieving 5% Weight Loss or More
Time Frame: Baseline, 18 months
Number and Percentage of men who achieve 5% or more of weight loss compared to their baseline weight
Baseline, 18 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Trajectory of Weight Change From Baseline Through 18 Months
Time Frame: 18 months
Slope of changes in weights abstracted from EHR from baseline through 18 months
18 months
Changes in Weight From Baseline
Time Frame: 6 months
Weight measurements were abstracted from EHR.
6 months
Changes in Weight From Baseline
Time Frame: 12 months
Weight measurements were abstracted from EHR.
12 months
Changes in Weight From Baseline
Time Frame: 18 months
Weight measurements were abstracted from EHR.
18 months
Change in Waist Circumference From Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline, 18 months
Waist circumference at 18 months - waist circumference at baseline
Baseline, 18 months
Change in Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline, 18 months
Systolic blood pressure at 18 months - systolic blood pressure at baseline
Baseline, 18 months
Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline, 18 months
Diastolic blood pressure at 18 months - diastolic blood pressure at baseline
Baseline, 18 months
Change in Health Behavior: Leisure Time Physical Activity
Time Frame: Baseline, 18 months
Physical activity measured at 18 months minus physical activity measured at baseline using Stanford 7-day physical activity recall
Baseline, 18 months
Change in Health Behavior: Energy Expenditure
Time Frame: Baseline, 18 months
The Stanford 7-day Physical Activity Recall data also provided estimates of total daily energy expenditures. Total energy expenditure = sleep hours × 1 MET + light activity hours × 1.5 METs + moderate activity hours × 4 METs + hard activity hours × 6 METs + very hard activity hours × 10 METs. Total daily energy expenditure at 18 months - Total daily energy expenditure at baseline.
Baseline, 18 months
Change in Health Behavior: Sedentary Behavior
Time Frame: Baseline, 18 months
Weekly hours of sedentary behavior measured at 18 months minus weekly hours of sedentary behavior at baseline using the Sedentary behavior Questionnaire
Baseline, 18 months
Change in Health Behavior: Diet Quality
Time Frame: Baseline, 18 months
Dietary intake was measured using the gold-standard approach of multiple pass 24-hour recalls in Spanish or English using Nutrition Data System for Research (NDSR). Diet quality was assessed by the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) score. DASH scores were calculated based on combining nine nutrient targets (i.e. total fat, saturated fat, protein, cholesterol, fiber, magnesium, calcium, sodium and potassium). A higher score reflects higher diet quality. The minimum score is 8 and the maximum is 40. DASH score at 18 months - DASH score at baseline.
Baseline, 18 months
Change in Health Behavior: Fruit and Vegetable Intake
Time Frame: Baseline, 18 months
Fruit and vegetable intake measured at 18 months minus fruit and vegetable intake measured at baseline using 24-hour multiple pass recalls. Fruit and vegetable intake is measured in servings per day.
Baseline, 18 months
Change in Health Behavior: Total Calorie Intake
Time Frame: Baseline, 18 months
Total calorie intake per day measured at 18 months minus total calorie intake per day measured at baseline using 24-hour multiple pass dietary recalls.
Baseline, 18 months
Change in Health Behavior: Total Fat
Time Frame: Baseline, 18 months
Total fat consumption per day measured at 18 months minus total fat consumption per day measured at baseline using 24-hour multiple pass dietary recalls.
Baseline, 18 months
Change in Psychosocial Well-being: Obesity-specific Quality of Life
Time Frame: Baseline, 18 months
Obesity-related Problem Scale, average scores of 8 questions with a range from 0 (no at all) to 3 (extremely). The average score is then multiplied by 100 and divided by 3 to convert to a scale of 0-100, with a higher score indicating more obesity-related problems. Obesity-related quality of life measured at 18 months - obesity-related quality of life measured at baseline.
Baseline, 18 months
Change in Psychosocial Well-being: Depressive Symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline, 18 months
The Patient Health Questionnaire PHQ-9 is a self-report questionnaire with 9 items. Respondents answered questions regarding how often a symptom has bothered them over the last two weeks. Each item is rated on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all, 1 = several days, 2 = more than half the days, 3 = nearly every day). PHQ-9 total score is the sum of the nine items, ranging from 0 to 27. Scores of 5, 10, 15, and 20 represent cutpoints for mild, moderate, moderately severe and severe depression, respectively. PHQ-9 score at 18 months - PHQ-9 score at baseline.
Baseline, 18 months
Change in Perceived Stress
Time Frame: Baseline, 18 months
Perceived stress scale with a range of 0 to 40 with higher scores indicating higher stress. Perceived stress at 18 months - Perceived stress at baseline.
Baseline, 18 months
Change in Psychosocial Well-being: Sleep Disturbance T-score
Time Frame: Baseline, 18 months
Sleep disturbance T-score, a population scale with a range from 25 (extreme disturbance or impairment) to 80 (not at all) converted from the raw total score of 8-item questionnaire. A score of 50 represents the average of the calibration sample, which was generally more enriched for chronic illness. Sleep disturbance score at 18 months - sleep disturbance score at baseline.
Baseline, 18 months
Change in Psychosocial Well-being: Sleep Impairment T-score
Time Frame: Baseline, 18 months
Sleep Impairment T-score, a population scale with a range from 25 (extreme disturbance or impairment) to 80 (not at all) converted from the raw total score of 8-item questionnaire. A score of 50 represents the average of the calibration sample, which was generally more enriched for chronic illness. Sleep impairment score at 18 months - sleep impairment at baseline.
Baseline, 18 months
Psychosocial Well-being: Number and Percentage of Participants Who Had no Problems With Mobility Domain in Utility-based Quality of Life Measured by EuroQol EQ-5D
Time Frame: 18 months
Utility-based quality of life was measured by EuroQol EQ-5D. Number and percentage of participants who had no problems with mobility.
18 months
Change in Psychosocial Well-being: Number and Percentage of Participants Who Had no Problems With Self Care Domain in Utility-based Quality of Life Measured by EuroQol EQ-5D
Time Frame: 18 months
Number and percentage of participants who had no problems with self care was measured using the Euro-QoL 5D (EQ-5D-5L), which includes 5 domains (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and depression and anxiety) scored on 5 levels (no, slight, moderate, severe, or extreme problems) and current health rated on a visual analogue scale from 0 to 100.
18 months
Change in Psychosocial Well-being: Number and Percentage of Participants Who Had no Problems With Usual Activities Domain in Utility-based Quality of Life Measured by EuroQol EQ-5D
Time Frame: 18 months
Number and percentage of participants who had no problems with usual activities (e.g. work, study, housework, family or leisure activities).
18 months
Change in Psychosocial Well-being: Number and Percentage of Participants Who Had no Problems With Pain/Discomfort Domain in Utility-based Quality of Life Measured by EuroQol EQ-5D
Time Frame: 18 months
Number and percentage of participants who had no problems with pain was measured using the Euro-QoL 5D (EQ-5D-5L), which includes 5 domains (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and depression and anxiety) scored on 5 levels (no, slight, moderate, severe, or extreme problems) and current health rated on a visual analogue scale from 0 to 100.
18 months
Change in Psychosocial Well-being: Number and Percentage of Participants Who Had no Problems With Anxiety and Depression Domain in Utility-based Quality of Life Measured by EuroQol EQ-5D
Time Frame: 18 months
Number and percentage of participants who had no problems with anxiety and depression was measured using the Euro-QoL 5D (EQ-5D-5L), which includes 5 domains (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and depression and anxiety) scored on 5 levels (no, slight, moderate, severe, or extreme problems) and current health rated on a visual analogue scale from 0 to 100.
18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kristen M Azar, RN, MSN, MPH, Sutter Health Research Development & Dissemination

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

April 3, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

May 31, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

May 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 15, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

March 28, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

November 17, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 19, 2021

Last Verified

October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obesity

Clinical Trials on Minimal intensity intervention

Subscribe