Measuring Patient-Reported Adverse Events in Oncology Practice Improves Quality of Life in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

March 22, 2017 updated by: Ying Sun, Sun Yat-sen University

Measuring Patient-Reported Adverse Events in Oncology Practice Improves Quality of Life in Patients With Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Undergoing Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Although patient-reported adverse events have been promoted as an essential element in clinical trials and daily managements, their efficacy remained unknown. The purpose of this trial was to determine the effect of the patient-reported adverse events during the treatment on the improvements on quality of life.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

320

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510060
        • Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with newly histologically confirmed non-keratinizing carcinoma (according to WHO histological type)
  • No evidence of distant metastasis (M0)
  • Performance status: PS 0~2
  • Receive standard treatment
  • Able to read and understand the questionnaires
  • Not exhibiting overt psychopathology
  • Willing to give feedback to physicians and written informed consent was obtained

Exclusion Criteria:

  • WHO type keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma or basaloid squamous cell carcinoma.
  • Treatment with palliative intent.
  • Prior malignancy (except adequately treated carcinoma in-situ of the cervix or basal/squamous cell carcinoma of the skin)
  • Previous chemotherapy or radiotherapy (except non-melanomatous skin cancers outside the intended RT treatment volume)
  • Patient is pregnant or lactating
  • Severe intercurrent disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: patient reported group
Patients reported adverse events using patient reported outcomes version of common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE) through Application (APP) during the treatment. The summary report was transferred to their clinician immediately. Oncologists would be alarmed if patients reports exceeding the pre-defined threshold.
The intervention was administrated through APP
Active Comparator: non-reported group
Patients in this group received normal care during the treatment without completing patient reported outcomes version of common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE)
patients receive normal care and visit

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Score of physical functioning in quality of life
Time Frame: within 1 week of study completion
Score of physical functioning in quality of life
within 1 week of study completion

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
3-year overall survival
Time Frame: 3 year after diagnosis
overall survival at three year after diagnosis
3 year after diagnosis
3-year progression-free survival
Time Frame: 3 year after diagnosis
progression-free survival at three year after diagnosis
3 year after diagnosis
3-year local-regional free survival
Time Frame: 3 year after diagnosis
local-regional free survival at three year after diagnosis
3 year after diagnosis
3-year metastatic-free survival
Time Frame: 3 year after diagnosis
metastatic-free survival at three year after diagnosis
3 year after diagnosis
completion rate
Time Frame: within 1 week of study completion
completion rate
within 1 week of study completion
degrees of patients satisfaction regarding the treatment process
Time Frame: within 1 week of study completion
degrees of patients satisfaction regarding the treatment process
within 1 week of study completion
response rate
Time Frame: 1 month after study completion
response rate
1 month after study completion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

July 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 16, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 22, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

March 28, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 28, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 22, 2017

Last Verified

March 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on adverse events using patient-reported outcomes version of common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE) questionaire

3
Subscribe