Management of Cisplatin-Ineligible Patients With Metastatic Bladder Cancer and The Role of Geriatric Assessments

April 19, 2024 updated by: Joaquim Bellmunt, MD, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
The goal of this study is to better understand how to best treat participants with advanced bladder cancer who may not be able to tolerate all of the chemotherapy drugs that have been shown to be effective. In this study, investigators are assessing the role of the survey, the Geriatric-8, and its ability to predict outcomes in older participants undergoing cancer treatments. Additionally, investigators are evaluating the differential impact of treatments on quality of life in an older and at risk population.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In this prospective, observational study, investigators are assessing the optimal approach to treating bladder cancer in older participants with other disease that might put the participants at additional risk from cancer-directed treatments. Investigators are specifically assessing the impact on adverse events, quality of life, and treatment outcomes. Additionally, investigators are assessing the role of the survey, the Geriatric-8, and its ability to predict outcomes in older participants.

The research study procedures include screening for eligibility and completing questionnaires.

Participation in this research study is expected to last for up to 8 months.

It is expected that about 180 people will take part in this research study.

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network and EMD Serono are supporting this research study by providing the necessary funds.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

180

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
        • Recruiting
        • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Joaquim Bellmunt, MD, PhD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Participants ≥65-years-old with metastatic or unresectable bladder cancer who are cisplatin-therapy ineligible.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥65-years-old (study will limit total enrollment of patients between ages 65-70 to 20% of the total study population)
  • Unresectable or metastatic bladder cancer with histologically proven urothelial carcinoma. Any component of variant histology is allowed
  • Cisplatin-ineligible as determined by the subject's primary oncologist
  • Receiving treatment with chemotherapy (+/- immunotherapy maintenance), enfortumab vedotin-pembrolizumab combination therapy or immunotherapy alone
  • Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document and to complete patient reported outcomes that will be in English or Spanish either alone or with assistance of study researcher or family

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects who elect to not undergo cancer-directed therapy
  • Subjects obtaining their care outside of DFCI or DFCI affiliate sites
  • Advanced cognitive impairment or inability to complete surveys
  • Participants who are receiving any other investigational agents for this condition (if appropriate only).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Cisplatin-Ineligible Metastatic Bladder Cancer

Participants receiving standard of care non-cisplatin based therapy (carboplatin-based chemotherapy, enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab or immunotherapy) and will complete study procedures as outlined below:

  • Baseline visit with questionnaires.
  • Complete surveys every 3 weeks by telephone or by in-office visit for 8 months.
  • Optional follow-up phone calls every 6 months for up to 3 years.
A screening tool to evaluate frailty and at-risk participants by covering multiple domains that contribute to frailty, including mobility, functional status, pharmacologic burden, and underlying psychologic burden. A total score ranges from 0 to 17 with participants scoring > 14 points are more likely to be fit, or having a better health status, while those scoring 0 - 14 would benefit from further comprehensive geriatric assessment.
Other Names:
  • G8
Patient reported, sixteen question survey focused on evaluation of quality of life in patients with bladder cancer.
Patient-reported questionnaire that evaluates cancer-specific toxicity, developed based upon Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of life in frail and at-risk patients with advanced bladder cancer deemed cisplatin-ineligible
Time Frame: 8 months
In frail and at-risk patients, as defined by geriatric-8 scores, will evaluate the difference in quality of life for participants receiving Carboplatin-based chemotherapy followed by immunotherapy maintenance versus Enfortumab Vedotin-Pembrolizumab. Quality of life will be measured by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network/Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Bladder Symptom Index-18 (NFBISI-18) version 2 questionnaire, a patient reported, eighteen question measure graded on a Likert scale.
8 months
Patient reported adverse events in frail and at-risk patients with advanced bladder cancer deemed cisplatin-ineligible
Time Frame: 8 months
In frail and at-risk patients, as defined by geriatric-8 scores, will evaluate the difference in patient reported adverse events relevant to patients with bladder cancer between patients treated with Enfortumab Vedotin-Pembrolizumab vs. Carboplatin-based chemotherapy followed by immunotherapy maintenance. Patient reported adverse events will be assessed by the National Cancer Institute's Patient Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) questionnaire which will analyze 30 items, characterizing 16 symptomatic toxicities related treatment in terms of frequency, severity, interference (scoring from 0 to 4), and/or presence or absence (scoring 0 or 1).
8 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to deterioration of quality of life in patients with advanced bladder cancer deemed cisplatin-ineligible
Time Frame: 8 months
In frail and at-risk patients as well as all study participants, will evaluate the difference in time to deterioration of quality of life in patients treated with Enfortumab Vedotin-Pembrolizumab versus Carboplatin-based chemotherapy followed by immunotherapy maintenance. The time to deterioration of quality of life will be defined as a ≥ 3 point decrease from initial NFBISI-18 score on two consecutive evaluations (spaced 3 weeks apart) and will be analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates.
8 months
Overall survival in patients with advanced bladder cancer deemed cisplatin-ineligible
Time Frame: Up to 3 years
In frail and at-risk patients as well as all study participants, will evaluate the difference in overall survival in patients treated with Enfortumab Vedotin-Pembrolizumab versus Carboplatin-based chemotherapy followed by immunotherapy maintenance. Overall survival will be defined as time from treatment initiation to death due to any cause or censored at date of last known alive. It will be analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates.
Up to 3 years
Geriatric-8 scores and acute care evaluations
Time Frame: 8 months
In all study participants, will evaluate the association of geriatric-8 scores with need for acute care evaluations. Acute care evaluations are defined as the need for either hospitalizations or emergency department visits, which will be descriptively summarized.
8 months
Geriatric-8 scores and treatment changes
Time Frame: 8 months
In all study participants, will evaluate the association of geriatric-8 scores with need for treatment changes.Treatment changes will be defined dose adjustments, treatment disruption, or early treatment discontinuation.
8 months
Geriatric-8 scores and time to deterioration of quality of life
Time Frame: 8 months
In all study participants, will evaluate the association of geriatric-8 scores with time to deterioration of quality of life. Time to deterioration of quality of life will be defined as a ≥ 3 point decrease from initial NFBISI-18 score on two consecutive evaluations (spaced 3 weeks apart) and will be analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates according to G8 score.
8 months
Geriatric-8 scores and overall survival
Time Frame: Up to 3 years
In all study participants, will evaluate the association of geriatric-8 scores with overall survival. Overall survival will be defined as time from treatment initiation to death due to any cause or censored at date of last known alive. It will be analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates according to G8 score
Up to 3 years
Frequency of acute care evaluations in patients with advanced bladder cancer deemed cisplatin-ineligible
Time Frame: 8 months
In frail and at-risk patients as well as all study participants, will evaluate the difference in need for acute care evaluations in patients treated with Enfortumab Vedotin-Pembrolizumab versus Carboplatin-based chemotherapy followed by immunotherapy maintenance. Need for acute care evaluations will be are defined as the need for either hospitalizations or emergency department visits.
8 months
Frequency of treatment changes in patients with advanced bladder cancer deemed cisplatin ineligible
Time Frame: 8 months
In frail and at-risk patients as well as all study participants, will evaluate the difference in need for treatment changes in patients treated with Enfortumab Vedotin-Pembrolizumab versus Carboplatin-based chemotherapy followed by immunotherapy maintenance. Treatment changes will be defined as dose adjustments, treatment disruption, or early treatment discontinuation.
8 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Joaquim Bellmunt, MD, PhD, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 5, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 14, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 14, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

November 18, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 23, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 19, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The Dana-Farber / Harvard Cancer Center encourages and supports the responsible and ethical sharing of data from clinical trials. De-identified participant data from the final research dataset used in the published manuscript may only be shared under the terms of a Data Use Agreement. Requests may be directed to: Joaquim Bellmunt. The protocol and statistical analysis plan will be made available on Clinicaltrials.gov only as required by federal regulation or as a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data can be shared no earlier than 1 year following the date of publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Contact the Belfer Office for Dana-Farber Innovations (BODFI) at innovation@dfci.harvard.edu

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bladder Cancer

Clinical Trials on Geriatric-8 Survey

3
Subscribe