Thoracic Fluid Content in Prediction of Failure of Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation

June 11, 2019 updated by: Ahmed Hasanin, Cairo University

The Impact of Thoracic Fluid Content Measured by Cardiometry on Prediction of Failure of Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation

This study aims to test the accuracy of the total thoracic fluid content (TFC) measured by cardiometry can predict weaning failure. Area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) will be determined, sensitivity, specificity, and best cutoff value will be calculated for TFC in prediction of weaning failure.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Weaning from mechanical ventilation is a serious and challenging process in critical care practice. Weaning failure is associated with poor patient outcomes. Increased mortality in patients with failed weaning was due to development of complications related to re-intubation. Detection and correction of the cause of failed spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) helps the intensives to improve the outcome of the next trials.

Fluid overload and positive cumulative fluid balance is a risk factor of weaning failure in both cardiac and non-cardiac patients.

Many tools for prediction of lung congestion as a risk factor for weaning failure have been reported. The gold standard for detection of cardiac cause of weaning failure was pulmonary artery catheter. More simple tools had been investigated for detection of cardiac cause of weaning failure in patients with or without previous cardiac dysfunction such as extravascular lung water and B-natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels.

Although measurement of extravascular lung water is a reliable tool for prediction of cardiac cause of weaning failure, it has the disadvantage of the need of advanced monitor with invasive arterial line. Bioreactance is a new technology used for measurement of cardiac output and total thoracic fluid content (TFC). More recently, electrical velocimetry is a newer technology with good performance in cardiac output monitoring. The use of electrical velocimetry in measurement of TFC has the advantage of being non-invasive with no need for advanced skills. The aim of this work is to validate the use of TFC (measured by electrical velocimetry) in prediction of weaning outcome.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

64

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt
        • Cairo University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients aged 18 years or more scheduled for a spontaneous weaning trial (SBT) using pressure support ventilation.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged 18 years or more scheduled for a spontaneous weaning trial (SBT) on pressure support ventilation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age < 18 years old.
  • Pregnant patients.
  • Neuromuscular disease (stroke, myasthenia gravis and Guillain-Barrésyndrome).
  • Tracheostomy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total thoracic fluid content (TFC)
Time Frame: 5 minutes before spontaneous breathing trial
the value of TFC measured by cardiometry device (in liters)
5 minutes before spontaneous breathing trial

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
rapid shallow breathing index
Time Frame: 5 minutes before spontaneous breathing trial.
the respiratory rate divided by the tidal volume (in liters)
5 minutes before spontaneous breathing trial.
P/F ratio
Time Frame: 5 minutes before spontaneous breathing trial and 5 minutes before patient extubation
pressure of arterial oxygen (in mmHg) divided by fraction of inspired oxygen
5 minutes before spontaneous breathing trial and 5 minutes before patient extubation
fluid balance
Time Frame: during the last 24 hours before the weaning trial
the total fluid intake minus the fluid output (in liters)
during the last 24 hours before the weaning trial

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 4, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

September 10, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 20, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 28, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

March 29, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 13, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 11, 2019

Last Verified

June 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • N-18-2017

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mechanical Ventilation Complication

Subscribe