GISMO - Geographical Information Support for Healthy Mobility (GISMO)

March 3, 2020 updated by: Prof. Josef Niebauer M.D., Ph.D., MBA, Paracelsus Medical University
GISMO combines spatial information with findings on the health effects of sustainable, active forms of mobility in the work environment in order to derive evidence-based decision-making bases for a health-promoting, operational mobility management. Existing approaches - with regard to spatial information systems, decision-support systems and health effects of active mobility - are considered and supplemented by our developments and investigations. Achieved non-personal results are provided through standardized web interfaces, ensuring integration into existing and prospective tools of an innovative and health-promoting mobility management.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The World Health Organization recommends a minimum of 150 minutes per week of moderate activity as a minimum for a healthy daily routine. The average employee in Austria works on 5 days a week and covers the distance from his place of residence to his place of work twice. This distance can be actively traveled (e.g., bicycle) or passively (e.g., car).

Due to a moderate physical activity (intensity 4-6 METs, corresponding to 4-6 times resting energy conversion) of 15 minutes in one direction, only the active minimum requirement for everyday activity would be achieved by active mobility to and from the workplace.

Design:

2: 1 randomized controlled trial (intervention group: control group)

Activities:

Motivation of the employees by health care professionals of a sample company (Salzburger Landeskrankenanstalten AG, SALK) to use the public transport as well as the bicycle or footpath on the way from and to the workplace.

Intervention A: Change from car to bicycle for at least 50% of the routes, n = 20-25 Employees who have previously traveled exclusively by car and are living within a radius of ≤10 kilometers from the workplace are motivated by the GVPs to switch to a bicycle. In the case of appropriate proximity, employees can travel the entire path without motorized mobility. The greatest health benefit is to be expected by largely dispensing with motorized mobility at work. In the case of bad weather, cold or similar obstacles, a public transport or car can be used occasionally and exceptionally.

Intervention B: Exit from public transport one or more stations earlier or enter one or more station later, n = 20-25 By extending the path to and from a stop, which is to be actively pursued, a health effect is expected. In the context of this intervention, the availability of time tickets will provide incentives for switching from car to public transport. In addition, the employees are motivated to use the next stop in order to extend the active distance. Access routes can also be covered on foot.

Control group: Maintaining the mobility as before n = 20-25

Method:

Before and after the intervention phase of 1 year (to take into account seasonal effects or fluctuations), parameters relevant to health are collected. Finally, the results of the initial examination are compared with those of the final examination in order to examine the effects of healthy mobility on the workplace on cardiovascular risk profile, everyday activity, physical performance, quality of life, mobility behavior, body composition.

The aim of this project is to generate data on the health effects of a healthy mobility.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

70

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Salzburg, Austria, 5020
        • Department of Sports Medicine, Prevention and Rehabilitation Paracelsus Medical University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • employees of SALK (possibly also employees of other companies), age 18-70 voluntary participation in the study, consent in German language, desire to change the currently prevailing passive mobility behavior.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • physical or psychological condition that makes the participation and completion of the study unlikely. i.e.:

    • Participation in further clinical trials at the same time, or at least four weeks time
    • Pregnancy or lactation
    • Well-known diseases of the movement apparatus, which could influence healthy mobility
    • Subjects with known endogenous or reactive depression or other psychiatric disorders such as panic disorder, schizophrenia, organic mental disorder, delirious, psychotic, phobic, or other psychiatric disorder in the last five years prior to study inclusion
    • Subjects with osteoporosis requiring treatment
    • Severe general disease (e.g., neoplasia, tuberculosis, heart failure)
    • Subjects with chronic infections
    • subjects with alcohol or drug abuse or dependency

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
see detailed discription
No Intervention: Control

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cardiorespiratory Fitness, i.e. metaboloic equivalents (METs)
Time Frame: 1 year
Ergometry
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cardiovascular Risk
Time Frame: 1 year
Heart Score of the European Society of Cardiology
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 20, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

October 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 18, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

April 4, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 4, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 3, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • GISMO-1

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Health Behavior

Clinical Trials on Active Mobility

Subscribe