Vitamin D as a Therapeutic Adjunct in the Stimulant Treatment of ADHD

February 20, 2024 updated by: Yale University

Vitamin D as a Therapeutic Adjunct in the Stimulant Treatment of ADHD: a Proof-of-concept Study of Stimulant-induced Dopamine Release Using [11C]-PHNO PET in Healthy Humans

Specific Aim 1: As part of a within-subject, two-days, study design, to determine whether acute calcitriol (vs. placebo) pre-treatment is associated with greater amphetamine (Amp)-induced dopamine (DA) release in the caudate, putamen, ventral striatum (VST), and substantia nigra / ventral tegmental area (SN/VTA) of healthy human subjects.

Specific Aim 2: To determine whether acute calcitriol (vs. placebo) pre-treatment is associated with better performance on a test of attention (e.g., the Continuous Performance Task or CPT-IP), after treatment with amphetamine. Hypothesis: Investigators hypothesize that Subjects pre-treated with calcitriol will have faster reaction times/higher accuracy on the CPT-IP vs. subjects pre-treated with placebo, after treatment with amphetamine.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Increases in the rates of childhood ADHD over the past two decades have lead to speculation that calcitriol deficiency (e.g., secondary to the increased use of sunscreen and/or increases in sedentary, indoor lifestyles in children) plays a causal/contributory role in the etiology of ADHD. To date, evidence of a direct link is lacking. One study showed higher maternal circulating Vitamin D levels in pregnancy are associated with lower risk of developing ADHD-like symptoms in childhood. On the other hand, another study did not replicate the above association, and a prospective study using umbilical cord samples stored at the time of birth reported no difference in serum vitamin D levels between ADHD group versus healthy controls. In terms of clinical trials, one randomized double blind study among adults with ADHD reported a beneficial effect of the intervention, measured with the Conners Adult ADHR rating scale, in comparison with placebo, but the intervention included the combination of vitamin D and several other micronutrients. An analysis of moderators of a positive response to ADHD behaviors did not reveal a significant predictive effect of vitamin D.

However, recent studies provide intriguing indirect evidence of an inverse relationship between solar intensity (SI) and/or altitude (a proxy for greater sun/UV light exposure) and regional rates of ADHD. One study examined three large datasets across 49 U.S. states for 2003 and 2007, and across 9 non-U.S. countries. This study examined the prevalence of ADHD and Solar Intensity (SI) maps. They found an inverse association between solar intensity and prevalence of ADHD. Another study examined two national survey datasets. They found an inverse relationship between altitude and prevalence of ADHD. Investigators hypothesize, as suggested by Huber, that a common denominator on the above studies is the increased vitamin D levels in those exposed to a higher solar intensity, which is known to increase with altitude.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

24

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06519
        • Connecticut Mental Health Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-50 years
  • Voluntary, written, informed consent
  • Physically healthy by medical history, physical, neurological, ECG, and laboratory examinations
  • For females, non-lactating, with a negative serum or urine pregnancy test
  • Lab results without clinically relevant findings (e.g. renal function, electrolytes, and vitamin D levels)
  • English speaking

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Medical contraindication to Dexedrine administration (e.g., history of cardiac problems, seizures, glaucoma, hypertension, hyperthyroidism, etc.)
  • Medical contraindication to calcitriol administration (e.g., history of hypersensitivity to calcitriol or any component of the formulation, hypercalcemia or vitamin D toxicity)
  • History of substance dependence (e.g., alcohol, opiates, sedative hypnotics), except for nicotine
  • A primary major DSM-5 psychiatric disorder (e.g., schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depression, etc.) as determined by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID)
  • A history of significant medical (e.g., cardiovascular, diabetic/metabolic) or neurological (e.g., cerebrovascular accidents, seizure, traumatic brain injury) illness
  • Positive answers on the cardiac history questionnaire that may place the subject at higher risk, as determined by an internal medicine specialist or cardiologist's review of both the questionnaire responses and screening ECG
  • Current use of psychotropic and/or potentially psychoactive prescription medications
  • For females, laboratory (β-HCG) or physical evidence of pregnancy/lactation 9) MRI-incompatible implants and other contraindications for MRI (i.e., aneurysm clip, metal fragments, internal electrical devices such as a cochlear implant, spinal cord stimulator or pacemaker)
  • History of claustrophobia or feeling of inability to lie still on his/her back for the PET or MRI scans
  • History of any bleeding disorder or current anticoagulant therapy
  • Donation or loss of 550 mL of blood or more (including plasmapheresis) or receipt of a transfusion of any blood product within 8 weeks prior to the first test day.
  • Use of any prescription medications and/or over-the-counter medications, vitamins and/or herbal supplements which could have a negative clinical interaction with calcitriol/Dexedrine or which could confound scientific results of the study, within 2 weeks prior to each test day (e.g., thiazide diuretics, Mg based antiacids, digoxin, etc,.).
  • Serum levels of 25(OH)D3 below 20 ng/ml.
  • Obesity i.e. BMI over 30 (more prone to lower vitamin D levels)
  • Subjects with history of prior radiation exposure for research purposes within the past year such that participation in this study would place them over Radioactive Drug Research Committee (RDRC) limits for annual radiation exposure. This guideline is an effective dose of 5 rem received per year.
  • Subjects with current, past or anticipated exposure to radiation in the work place
  • History of kidney stones within the past 5 years
  • Any degree of renal failure
  • History of parathyroid disorder (hyper or hypoparathyroidism)
  • History of osteoporosis or any pathologic fractures
  • Vitamin D supplementation in any form in the past 3 months
  • Known hypersensitivity to Dexedrine, [11C]PHNO, or calcitriol
  • Malabsorption syndromes (i.e. Celiac sprue)
  • Serum corrected calcium > 10.5 mg/dl or phosphate > 4.2 mg/dl

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Calcitriol then placebo
Healthy volunteers will receive a baseline MRI. On the night before and day of testing, subjects will receive two doses of calcitriol (3.0mcg total), followed by PHNO injection and PET Scan #1. After PET Scan #1, subjects will receive a Dexedrine dose, followed by PHNO injection and PET Scan #2. A minimum of six days later, subjects will receive two doses of placebo for the night before and day of testing, followed by a third PHNO injection and PET scan #3. After PET scan #3, subjects will receive another Dexedrine dose, followed by PHNO injection and PET scan #4.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans (3 T) will be collected in each subject for the purposes of excluding participants with anatomical abnormalities and anatomically co-registering PET and MRI for image analysis
Used as a tracer for in vivo imaging.
three 0.5 mcg capsules
three 0.5 mcg capsules
A functional imaging technique that is used to observe metabolic processes in the body.
Other Names:
  • PET scan
Dexedrine 0.3 mg/kg, to a maximum dose of 30 mg
Other Names:
  • Dexedrine
Experimental: Placebo then Calcitriol
Healthy volunteers will receive a baseline MRI. On the night before and day of testing, subjects will receive two doses of placebo, followed by PHNO injection and PET Scan #1. After PET Scan #1, subjects will receive a Dexedrine dose, followed by PHNO injection and PET Scan #2. A minimum of six days later, subjects will receive two doses of calcitriol (3.0mcg total) for the night before and day of testing, followed by a third PHNO injection and PET scan #3. After PET scan #3, subjects will receive another Dexedrine dose, followed by PHNO injection and PET scan #4.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans (3 T) will be collected in each subject for the purposes of excluding participants with anatomical abnormalities and anatomically co-registering PET and MRI for image analysis
Used as a tracer for in vivo imaging.
three 0.5 mcg capsules
three 0.5 mcg capsules
A functional imaging technique that is used to observe metabolic processes in the body.
Other Names:
  • PET scan
Dexedrine 0.3 mg/kg, to a maximum dose of 30 mg
Other Names:
  • Dexedrine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Non-displaceable Tracer Binding Potentials
Time Frame: day 1
non-displaceable tracer binding potentials (BPND = VT - VREF / VREF), which are linearly proportional to the density of available D2/3 Rs, computed using a simplified reference tissue model (SRTM) utilizing the cerebellum as a reference region.
day 1
Non-displaceable Tracer Binding Potentials
Time Frame: day 7
non-displaceable tracer binding potentials (BPND = VT - VREF / VREF), which are linearly proportional to the density of available D2/3 Rs, computed using a simplified reference tissue model (SRTM) utilizing the cerebellum as a reference region.
day 7

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Continuous Performance Task (CPT-IP)
Time Frame: day 1
In this computer based test, subjects are shown a random sequence of numbers (2-digit, 3-digit, and 4-digit) and are instructed to press a button as quickly and accurately as possible (with their preferred hand) when a number repeats. Subjects are instructed to withhold their response for any other sequence of numbers. The measure is presented as dprime, which is calculated: d' = z(H) - z(F), where z(H) is the z-score of the hit rate and z(F) is the z-score of the false positive rate. A z-score of 0 represents the population mean. d' is indicates better performance on the task with higher values, z(H) indicates better performance on the task with higher values due to higher hit rate, and z(F) indicates worse performance on the task with higher values due to higher false positive rates.
day 1
Continuous Performance Task (CPT-IP)
Time Frame: day 7
In this computer based test, subjects are shown a random sequence of numbers (2-digit, 3-digit, and 4-digit) and are instructed to press a button as quickly and accurately as possible (with their preferred hand) when a number repeats. Subjects are instructed to withhold their response for any other sequence of numbers. The measure is presented as dprime, which is calculated: d' = z(H) - z(F), where z(H) is the z-score of the hit rate and z(F) is the z-score of the false positive rate. A z-score of 0 represents the population mean. d' is indicates better performance on the task with higher values, z(H) indicates better performance on the task with higher values due to higher hit rate, and z(F) indicates worse performance on the task with higher values due to higher false positive rates.
day 7

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marc Potenza, PhD, MD, Yale University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 15, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 17, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

January 17, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 30, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 30, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

April 6, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 19, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on ADHD

Clinical Trials on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

3
Subscribe