- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03106103
Incidence of Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Bacteriuria After Urodynamic Study in Women
Incidence of Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Bacteriuria After Urodynamic Study With or Without Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Women With Urinary Incontinence
Urodynamic Study (UDS) represents a series of agreed-upon clinical tests and is used to evaluate the functional status of the lower urinary tract, providing a pathophysiological basis for urinary symptoms. Urodynamic Study involves catheterization of the lower urinary tract. The prevalence of urinary tract infection after UDS ranges from 1,5% to 30 %.
Studies of prophylactic antibiotics for UDSs have offered data of contradictory and limited predictive values. Some investigators concluded that prophylactic antibiotics were valuable and others have not.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis before UDS in women, using different antibiotic regimens.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
This study is randomized, double blind study was carried out in the Department of Gynecology at Sao Paulo Federal University from January 2009 to December 2012.
The patients were randomized in four groups: Group A received 500mg of levofloxacin, group B received placebo, group C received 80mg trimethoprim and 400mg sulfamethoxazole (SMZ-TMP) and group D received 100mg of nitrofurantoin. The tablets were administered 30 minutes before de UDS.
All patients were instructed to collect midstream urine sample to the microbiology laboratory 14 days after the UDS. Significant bacteriuria was considered when >1.000.000 organisms/mL of a single species was isolated.
All data were entered into Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) 16.0 for statistical analysis and graphic representation. Likelihood -ratio test and Fisher's exact test were used to compare the prevalence of significant bacteriuria after UDS in the different groups and Student's t-test and ANOVA test were used to compare continuous variables. To compare the groups regarding the BMI variable and parity, the model analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used, or if necessary, the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test and to compare the groups in relation to menopause variable, we used the Chi-square test. A significance level of 0.05 was established for statistical analysis.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
- Inclusion Criteria: Women with 20 to 85 years old, clinical diagnosis of urinary incontinence with indication for urodynamic study, absence of genital prolapse or prolapse peak effort that does not exceed the hymen, absence of urinary tract infection
- Exclusion Criteria: Patients with diabetes mellitus, history of recurrence urinary tract infection, with genital prolapse that exceed de hymen, pregnant, kidney stone, allergy to antibiotics, use of urethral catheters delay
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
---|
Women with urinary incontinence
The patients were randomized in four groups: Group A received 500mg of levofloxacin, group B received placebo, group C received 80mg trimethoprim and 400mg sulfamethoxazole (SMZ-TMP) and group D received 100mg of nitrofurantoin.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
Incidence of symptomatic and asymptomatic bacteriuria after urodynamic study in women with urinary incontinence
Time Frame: 24 months
|
24 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Elizabeth Hirakauva, Doctor, Federal University of São Paulo
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- EYH-2014
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Female Stress Incontinence
-
University of California, San FranciscoNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK); Stanford...CompletedUrinary Incontinence, Stress | Urge Incontinence | Urinary Stress Incontinence | Stress Incontinence, Urinary | Stress Incontinence | Stress Incontinence, Female | Urgency UrinaryUnited States
-
University of New MexicoRecruitingUrinary Incontinence | Urge Incontinence | Stress Incontinence, FemaleUnited States
-
Gaziosmanpasa Research and Education HospitalRecruiting
-
Kasr El Aini HospitalNot yet recruitingStress Incontinence, Female
-
Ohio State UniversityUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel HillCompletedFemale Stress IncontinenceUnited States
-
Hvidovre University HospitalCompleted
-
Rambam Health Care CampusCompletedStress Incontinence, FemaleIsrael
-
Aljazeera HospitalKasr El Aini HospitalUnknown
-
Hospital Universitário Professor Edgard SantosCompletedFemale Stress Incontinence
-
University of AberdeenAberdeen Royal InfirmaryCompletedFemale Stress IncontinenceUnited Kingdom