Monocytic Expression of Heme Oxidase-1 (HO-1) in Sickle Cell Patients and Correlation With the Humoral Immune Response to Vaccine and With Allo-immunization.

October 17, 2018 updated by: Francis Corazza

Monocytic Expression of Heme Oxidase-1 (HO-1) in Sickle Cell Patients and Correlation With the Humoral Immune Response to Vaccine and With Allo-immunization

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is an autosomal recessive disorder resulting from a substitution in the β chain of hemoglobin (Hb) which causes hemoglobin S to polymerize when deoxygenated. SCD patients present immune abnormalities that have always been attributed to functional asplenia. It it is now being recognized that patients with SCD have a pro-inflammatory condition with altered immune system activation contributing to the pathology of SCD. Increased levels of neutrophils, monocytes or cytokines have been reported in SCD patients.

SCD is associated with many acute and chronic complications requiring immediate support. Actual strongly recommended therapies include chronic blood transfusions (CT) and hydroxyurea (HU). In addition, episodic transfusions are recommended and commonly used to manage many acute SCD complications.There is strong evidence to support the use of HU in adults with 3 or more severe vaso-occlusive crises during any 12-month period, with SCD pain or chronic anemia, or with severe or recurrent episodes of acute chest syndrome. HU use is now also common in children with SCD. Some patients receive chronic monthly RBC transfusion with the objective to reduce the proportion of HbS to < 30 %. Long-term RBC transfusions prevent and treat complications of SCD decreasing the risk of stroke and the incidence of acute chest syndrome (ACS).

Therapeutic complications, such as alloimmunization against RBC in 20-50% of patients or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) graft rejection, constitute an immune-based clinical issue in SCD. Poorly understood RBC alloimmunization is responsible for serious hemolytic transfusion reaction associated with severe mortality and morbidity underlying the need for a better understanding of the immunology of SCD to improve SCD transfusion support/outcome. Little evidence exists about HU effects on immune functions in SCD. HU treatment doesn't appear to have deleterious effects on immune function and appears to decrease the abnormally elevated number of total WBC and lymphocytes, while CT does not.

Patients with SCD are at higher risk of infections and prophylactic vaccination is strongly recommended. Recent data suggest that vaccinal response to pneumococcal antigens in SCD patients is identical to healthy control while controversy concern the stability of the immune protection after vaccination of SCD patient. Antibody levels declined over the year and the need for more frequent vaccination in SCD patient should be investigated. Currently, there is no evidence whether HU may interfere with pneumococcal immune response. Purohit showed that immune response to inactivated influenza A (H1N1) virus vaccine was altered in patient with SCD receiving CT but little is known on immune response to vaccination in patients with SCD receiving HU.

Recent data suggest that not only inflammatory status but also humoral immune response to antigens in SCD patients may differ according to treatment. Yazdanbakhsh reported an imbalance between regulatory T cell (Treg) and effector T cell (Teff) in alloimmunized SCD patients with as consequence an increase in antibody production. In a model proposed by the authors, the balance between Treg and Teff is dictated by the monocyte control of cytokines expression. Altered activity of monocyte heme oxidase-1 (HO-1) would be responsible of a decrease in IL-12 and an increase in IL-10 cytokines secretion impacting the Treg/Teff cells ratio and promoting antibody production by B cells.

The objectives of the project are to assess whether different humoral immune responses to vaccines or to erythrocyte alloantigens are related to the type of treatment administered to patients with SCD. We also aim to study if these differences might be related to different expressions of HO-1 by monocytes.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

102

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Brussels, Belgium, 1020
        • CHU Brugmann
      • Brussels, Belgium, 1020
        • Huderf

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- Pediatric and adult patients with sickle cell disease from the HUDERF and CHU-Brugmann Hospital

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: SCD patients under regular chronic exchange transfusion
Sickle cell disease patients (SCD) under regular chronic exchange transfusions. Pediatric and adult patients from the HUDERF and CHU-Brugmann Hospitals.
All groups of patients and the control group will receive the new annually recommended inactivated influenza A (H1N1) virus vaccine.
Testing of the different humoral immune responses to vaccines or to erythrocyte alloantigens.
Experimental: SCD patients under HU treatment alone
Sickle cell disease patients (SCD) under hydroxyurea (HU) alone. Pediatric and adult patients from the HUDERF and CHU-Brugmann Hospitals.
All groups of patients and the control group will receive the new annually recommended inactivated influenza A (H1N1) virus vaccine.
Testing of the different humoral immune responses to vaccines or to erythrocyte alloantigens.
Experimental: SCD patients under HU treatment+sporadic transfusion
Sickle cell disease patients (SCD) under hydroxyurea (HU) and receiving sporadic transfusions.Pediatric and adult patients from the HUDERF and CHU-Brugmann Hospitals.
All groups of patients and the control group will receive the new annually recommended inactivated influenza A (H1N1) virus vaccine.
Testing of the different humoral immune responses to vaccines or to erythrocyte alloantigens.
Active Comparator: Control group
Pediatric and adult patients from the HUDERF and CHU-Brugmann Hospitals.
All groups of patients and the control group will receive the new annually recommended inactivated influenza A (H1N1) virus vaccine.
Testing of the different humoral immune responses to vaccines or to erythrocyte alloantigens.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intracellular HO-1 expression in monocytes
Time Frame: 1 month post vaccination
Intracellular monocyte heme oxidase-1 (HO-1) expression will be measured by flow cytometry.The protein expression of HO-1 will be confirmed by Western blot. A commercial ELISA kit will be used in parallel to assess HO-1 levels in PBMC cell lysate.
1 month post vaccination
HO-1 level in serum
Time Frame: 1 month post vaccination
Monocyte heme oxidase-1 (HO-1) level in serum will be measured by a commercial ELISA kit
1 month post vaccination
Cytokines levels measurement
Time Frame: 1 month post vaccination
Pro-inflammatory cytokine (IL-12) and anti-inflammatory cytokine (IL-10) levels will be evaluated in serum and in IL-1 stimulated whole blood supernatants using an ELISA assay.
1 month post vaccination
Identification of T regulatory cells
Time Frame: 1 month post vaccination
Evaluation of Treg cells in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) will be performed by flow cytometry using appropriate fluorochrome conjugated monoclonal antibodies for CD25 and FoxP3 markers
1 month post vaccination
Immune response to vaccination
Time Frame: 1 month post vaccination
Post-vaccination serum H1N1 antibodies titers (IgG and IgM) will be measured by an ELISA kit
1 month post vaccination

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intracellular HO-1 expression in monocytes
Time Frame: Baseline: at vaccination
Intracellular HO-1 expression will be measured by flow cytometry.The protein expression of HO-1 will be confirmed by Western blot. A commercial ELISA kit will be used in parallel to assess HO-1 levels in PBMC cell lysate.
Baseline: at vaccination
Intracellular HO-1 expression in monocytes
Time Frame: 3 months post vaccination
Intracellular HO-1 expression will be measured by flow cytometry.The protein expression of HO-1 will be confirmed by Western blot. A commercial ELISA kit will be used in parallel to assess HO-1 levels in PBMC cell lysate.
3 months post vaccination
Intracellular HO-1 expression in monocytes
Time Frame: 6 months post vaccination
Intracellular HO-1 expression will be measured by flow cytometry.The protein expression of HO-1 will be confirmed by Western blot. A commercial ELISA kit will be used in parallel to assess HO-1 levels in PBMC cell lysate.
6 months post vaccination
HO-1 level in serum
Time Frame: Baseline: at vaccination
HO-1 level in serum will be measured by a commercial ELISA kit
Baseline: at vaccination
HO-1 level in serum
Time Frame: 3 months post vaccination
HO-1 level in serum will be measured by a commercial ELISA kit
3 months post vaccination
HO-1 level in serum
Time Frame: 6 months post vaccination
HO-1 level in serum will be measured by a commercial ELISA kit
6 months post vaccination
Cytokines levels measurement
Time Frame: Baseline: at vaccination
Pro-inflammatory cytokine (IL-12) and anti-inflammatory cytokine (IL-10) levels will be evaluated in serum and in IL-1 stimulated whole blood supernatants using an ELISA assay.
Baseline: at vaccination
Cytokines levels measurement
Time Frame: 3 months post vaccination
Pro-inflammatory cytokine (IL-12) and anti-inflammatory cytokine (IL-10) levels will be evaluated in serum and in IL-1 stimulated whole blood supernatants using an ELISA assay.
3 months post vaccination
Cytokines levels measurement
Time Frame: 6 months post vaccination
Pro-inflammatory cytokine (IL-12) and anti-inflammatory cytokine (IL-10) levels will be evaluated in serum and in IL-1 stimulated whole blood supernatants using an ELISA assay.
6 months post vaccination
Identification of T regulatory cells
Time Frame: Baseline: at vaccination
Evaluation of Treg cells in PBMC will be performed by flow cytometry using appropriate fluorochrome conjugated monoclonal antibodies for CD25 and FoxP3 markers
Baseline: at vaccination
Identification of T regulatory cells
Time Frame: 3 months post vaccination
Evaluation of Treg cells in PBMC will be performed by flow cytometry using appropriate fluorochrome conjugated monoclonal antibodies for CD25 and FoxP3 markers
3 months post vaccination
Identification of T regulatory cells
Time Frame: 6 months post vaccination
Evaluation of Treg cells in PBMC will be performed by flow cytometry using appropriate fluorochrome conjugated monoclonal antibodies for CD25 and FoxP3 markers
6 months post vaccination
Immune response to vaccination
Time Frame: Baseline: at vaccination
Post-vaccination serum H1N1 antibodies titers (IgG and IgM) will be measured by an ELISA kit
Baseline: at vaccination
Immune response to vaccination
Time Frame: 3 months post vaccination
Post-vaccination serum H1N1 antibodies titers (IgG and IgM) will be measured by an ELISA kit
3 months post vaccination
Immune response to vaccination
Time Frame: 6 months post vaccination
Post-vaccination serum H1N1 antibodies titers (IgG and IgM) will be measured by an ELISA kit
6 months post vaccination

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Francis Corazza, MD, CHU Brugmann

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 7, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 7, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

April 13, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 18, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 17, 2018

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sickle Cell Disease

Clinical Trials on Inactivated influenza A (H1N1) virus vaccine

3
Subscribe