Microfidelity (MIFI) Ablation Technology Versus Standard Ablation Catheter for Atrioventricular Nodal Ablation

August 31, 2021 updated by: University of Florida

Microfidelity (MIFI) Ablation Technology Versus Standard Ablation Catheter for Atrioventricular Nodal Ablation A Comparative Pilot Study of Time to Success

The aim of our study is to investigate the comparative efficacy of high fidelity multi electrode ablation catheters vs the standard bipolar configuration in success of AV nodal ablation This study will provide insights on the use of new technology where application may increase efficacy, promote patient and physician safety and decrease costs.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Introduction In some elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), especially in combination with heart failure, a rate control strategy may be preferred. When pharmacological therapy is ineffective or not tolerated, it is reasonable to perform atrioventricular (AV) node ablation with ventricular pacing as a class IIA indication per current guidelines.

Usually, the procedure is simple and straightforward and complete heart block can be achieved without any difficulty. However, this "simple" procedure can sometimes prove to be a most difficult case. The most common reason for failure to achieve complete heart block is the inability to localize the compact AV node using the His signal with standard intracardiac electrograms. As these patients come to the laboratory in AF, the His signal may be obscured by AF waves. In some patients with a deeper intramyocardial location of the His bundle and compact AV node it becomes necessary to produce deeper ablation lesions using an irrigated catheter to achieve block.

In patients with AF, the target of ablation for the "ablate and pace" approach is the compact AV node, located at the apex of the triangle of Koch. Ideally, ablation is performed at the most proximal penetrating part of the His bundle in order to maintain a proximal automatic junctional rhythm and avoid pacemaker dependence.

Para Hisian pacing is most commonly used to reveal the presence of a septal accessory pathway.

The His bundle is a deep insulated structure and it is difficult to capture it at usual energy outputs. Using a high- output pacing (usually 20 mA at 2 msec) it is possible to directly capture the deeply situated His bundle, which is confirmed by a narrower QRS complex on the paced electrograms. Thus, high-output pacing can be utilized to map the His bundle area in difficult situations.

By applying this electrophysiologic principle of differential tissue capture to help identify the location of the compact AV node, which is in close proximity to the His bundle. Ventricular pacing was performed initially at high output to capture both the basal right ventricular myocardium and the His bundle and the output was gradually lowered to lose His bundle capture. The QRS duration is relatively narrow with high output pacing and increases when the pacing output is lowered, representing ventricular myocardial capture alone. Finally, loss of ventricular capture is seen with further reduction of pacing output. This maneuver has been shown to aid in determining the proximity of the ablation catheter to compact AV node as was validated by successful ablation at this site. Parahisian pacing in conjunction with av nodal ablation has recently been described in the literature.

A novel catheter with three mini electrodes within the ablation tip (IntellaTip MiFi, Boston Scientific, Boston, MA) may enhance the available data for such a signal dependent technique. In this catheter, bipolar signals can be recorded between the three 0.8-mm-wide electrodes that are arranged radially 1.3 mm from the end of the catheter alongside the standard distal and proximal bipolar recordings. Animal studies have already demonstrated that the mini electrodes in this novel catheter are more accurate in identifying conducting gaps in linear ablations than conventional electrode recordings.

Study Aims:

The aim of our study is to investigate the comparative efficacy of high fidelity multi electrode ablation catheters vs the standard bipolar configuration in success of AV nodal ablation This study will provide insights on the use of new technology where application may increase efficacy, promote patient and physician safety and decrease costs.

Primary and secondary objectives Primary endpoints

  1. Acute success of ablation identified by a junctional rhythm or complete heart block
  2. Time from application of radiofrequency energy to acute success

Secondary endpoints include

  1. Procedure time
  2. Radiation time
  3. Frequency of ablation application
  4. Duration of ablation application

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32209
        • University of Florida

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 95 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with a diagnosis of persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation documented on electrocardiography
  2. Patients must meet American College of Cardiology and Heart Rhythm Society "ACC/HRS" guidelines for atrioventricular nodal ablation procedure
  3. Patients must be available for at least 1 month post procedure
  4. Patients must be greater than or equal to 18 years old.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Patients who do not meet ACC/HRS indications for av nodal ablation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Bipolar Ablation Catheter
Subjects will be randomized by random computer programming to receive standard ablation catheter for their procedure.
Standard of care for patients with certain cardiac arrhythmias.
Experimental: MIFI Ablation Catheter
Subjects will be randomized by random computer programming to receive an ablation with MIFI technology. MIFI Catheter contains tightly spaced multielectrode pattern
Multielectrode Catheter: standard ablation catheter that has the ability to record low and high frequency signals with high fidelity

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Time Differences Between the 2 Arms for Acute Success of Ablation Identified by a Junctional Rhythm or Complete Heart Block
Time Frame: 60 seconds
Identified by a junctional rhythm or complete heart block. Time zero is when the ablation procedure begins and the successful outcomes are either complete heart block or junctional rhythm.
60 seconds

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time From Application of Radio-frequency Energy to Acute Success
Time Frame: up to 3000 seconds
The target will be where the HIS electrogram amplitude is greatest and where the QRS complex from pacing is narrowest.
up to 3000 seconds

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: John N Catanzaro, MD, University of Florida

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 23, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 26, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

November 9, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 21, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

April 14, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 22, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 31, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atrial Fibrillation

Clinical Trials on Standard Ablation Catheter

Subscribe