Systematic Description of the Post EMR Defect

June 28, 2023 updated by: Professor Michael Bourke, Western Sydney Local Health District

Visible Vessels do Not Predict Clinically Significant Bleeding After EMR - a Systematic Description of the Post EMR Defect

To date there are no available data on the utility of the endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) defect in stratifying the risk of immediate or delayed adverse outcomes, particularly clinically significant post EMR bleeding (CSPEB).

The investigators aimed to analyse the data to determine if any of these EMR defect features allow us to estimate the risk of CSPEB. This will help endoscopists to identify defects with a high risk of adverse outcomes and may translate into improved patient outcomes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

CSPEB is the most frequent serious complication after wide-field EMR of laterally spreading lesions ≥ 20mm (LSLs). There is no proven therapy for CSPEB and it remains a significant drawback of EMR. Visible vessels within the post EMR defect (PED) present themselves as logical targets for prophylactic treatment to prevent CSPEB. However, the clinical significance of these vessels is largely unknown. In the majority of studies risk factors identified for CSPEB include right colon location, lesion size and aspirin use. The investigators aimed to systematically describe and evaluate the clinical significance of the various endoscopic features of the post EMR defect PED including visible vessels.

A prospective study of LSLs ≥ 20mm referred for EMR at a single tertiary referral center will be performed.

Data collection includes patient, procedural and lesion characteristics. In all cases a systematic description of the PED is undertaken. The data of particular interest to this study includes: use of blood thinners, PED features including size, number and herniation of visible vessels, submucosal haemorrhage, fibrosis, fat and exposed muscle and the rate of CSPEB.These features were analysed for significant association with CSPEB. CSPEB was defined as any bleeding occurring after the completion of the procedure necessitating emergency department presentation, hospitalization or reintervention. CSPEB was compared to features of the PED to detect significant associations, using chi2 or Fisher's exact tests. Significant univariate variables will be taken forward for binomial logistic regression modelling.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

482

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New South Wales
      • Westmead, New South Wales, Australia, 2145
        • Westmead Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Consecutive patients with a colonic laterally spreading lesion ≥ 20mm referred for EMR at a single tertiary referral centre will be included.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients referred for EMR of a LSL 20mm or larger
  • Signed the informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clips used during the EMR procedure to close the defect, totally or partially
  • Inadequate images to adequately assess the defect
  • Use of blood thinners which have not been ceased according to the current guidelines for EMR

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Bland blue defect
The defect after endoscopic mucosal resection of the colonic large laterally spreading lesion (20mm or more) is blue without any other defect features (as described in the second group, 'non bland blue defect'). The blue is the result of the submucosal injection of dye (indigo carmine), used to lift lesions before starting the resection.
Non bland blue defect
The defect after endoscopic mucosal resection of the colonic large laterally spreading lesion (20mm or more) is not just blue, but contains other defect features, such as visible vessels, herniation of vessels, submucosal fat, exposed muscle, fibrous bands, submucosal haemorrhage or non stained submucosa.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Defect features predicting clinically significant post EMR bleeding
Time Frame: day of procedure until 2 weeks after the procedure
To assess if any of the defect features can predict clinically significant post EMR bleeding
day of procedure until 2 weeks after the procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Defect features predicting other adverse events
Time Frame: day of procedure until 2 weeks after the procedure
To assess if any of the defect features can predict perforation or recurrence
day of procedure until 2 weeks after the procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael Bourke, MBBS, FRACP, WSLHD

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 2, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

March 30, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 11, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 11, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

April 18, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 29, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 28, 2023

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HREC/15/5/5.3 (4272)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Endoscopic Mucosal Resection

3
Subscribe