- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03134079
Influence on Food Liking of Adding Spices to Replace Dietary Sugar
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- age 18-65 years
Exclusion Criteria:
- diagnosed taste or sensory disorders that would prevent subject from evaluating the food
- known eating disorders
- allergies to the test food/ingredients
- medical conditions that may adversely affect taste (e.g., dysgeusia)
- inability to complete the protocol
- personal dietary restrictions towards test meal items
- dislike of the particular food items to be served in the test meals
- Subjects who do not consume foods or beverages that contain sugar or to which they have added sugar will be excluded.
- Subjects who have not consumed or would not be willing to consume hot tea, oatmeal or baked apple products will be excluded.
- Subjects who are pregnant or trying to become pregnant will be excluded.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: full sugar recipe
Each subject was randomly assigned to one of six possible sequences to taste three recipes of each test item. Oatmeal and tea were served together and tastings occurred over three weeks; tasting of apple crisp occurred over three different weeks. Tastings of the three recipes occurred one week apart. The three recipes were full sugar recipe (FS), reduced sugar recipe (RS) and reduced sugar plus spice recipe (RSS). Each subject was randomly assigned to one of the below sequence schedules for each taste test whereby A, B, and C refer to one of the three recipes (FS, RS, or RSS): Sequence 1: A, B, C Sequence 2: A, C, B Sequence 3: B, A, C Sequence 4: B, C, A Sequence 5: C, A, B Sequence 6: C, B, A |
Subjects tasted three items (apple crisp, tea and oatmeal) in a randomized sequence schedule to allow for tasting the three recipes (full sugar recipe, reduced sugar recipe and reduced sugar plus spice recipe) over three weeks.
Oatmeal and tea were served together as a breakfast meal and tastings of oatmeal and tea were done over 3 weeks and tastings for apple crisp (served alone) were done over 3 different weeks.
Subjects tasted one of the three recipes at each weekly seating.
Subjects tasted three items (apple crisp, tea and oatmeal) in a randomized sequence schedule to allow for tasting the three recipes (full sugar recipe, reduced sugar recipe and reduced sugar plus spice recipe) over three weeks.
Oatmeal and tea were served together as a breakfast meal and tastings of oatmeal and tea were done over 3 weeks and tastings for apple crisp (served alone) were done over 3 different weeks.
Subjects tasted one of the three recipes at each weekly seating.
Subjects tasted three items (apple crisp, tea and oatmeal) in a randomized sequence schedule to allow for tasting the three recipes (full sugar recipe, reduced sugar recipe and reduced sugar plus spice recipe) over three weeks.
Oatmeal and tea were served together as a breakfast meal and tastings of oatmeal and tea were done over 3 weeks and tastings for apple crisp (served alone) were done over 3 different weeks.
Subjects tasted one of the three recipes at each weekly seating.
|
|
Experimental: reduced sugar recipe
Each subject was randomly assigned to one of six possible sequences to taste three recipes of each test item. Oatmeal and tea were served together and tastings occurred over three weeks; tasting of apple crisp occurred over three different weeks. Tastings of the three recipes occurred one week apart. The three recipes were full sugar recipe (FS), reduced sugar recipe (RS) and reduced sugar plus spice recipe (RSS). Each subject was randomly assigned to one of the below sequence schedules for each taste test whereby A, B, and C refer to one of the three recipes (FS, RS, or RSS): Sequence 1: A, B, C Sequence 2: A, C, B Sequence 3: B, A, C Sequence 4: B, C, A Sequence 5: C, A, B Sequence 6: C, B, A |
Subjects tasted three items (apple crisp, tea and oatmeal) in a randomized sequence schedule to allow for tasting the three recipes (full sugar recipe, reduced sugar recipe and reduced sugar plus spice recipe) over three weeks.
Oatmeal and tea were served together as a breakfast meal and tastings of oatmeal and tea were done over 3 weeks and tastings for apple crisp (served alone) were done over 3 different weeks.
Subjects tasted one of the three recipes at each weekly seating.
Subjects tasted three items (apple crisp, tea and oatmeal) in a randomized sequence schedule to allow for tasting the three recipes (full sugar recipe, reduced sugar recipe and reduced sugar plus spice recipe) over three weeks.
Oatmeal and tea were served together as a breakfast meal and tastings of oatmeal and tea were done over 3 weeks and tastings for apple crisp (served alone) were done over 3 different weeks.
Subjects tasted one of the three recipes at each weekly seating.
Subjects tasted three items (apple crisp, tea and oatmeal) in a randomized sequence schedule to allow for tasting the three recipes (full sugar recipe, reduced sugar recipe and reduced sugar plus spice recipe) over three weeks.
Oatmeal and tea were served together as a breakfast meal and tastings of oatmeal and tea were done over 3 weeks and tastings for apple crisp (served alone) were done over 3 different weeks.
Subjects tasted one of the three recipes at each weekly seating.
|
|
Experimental: reduced sugar plus spice recipe
Each subject was randomly assigned to one of six possible sequences to taste three recipes of each test item. Oatmeal and tea were served together and tastings occurred over three weeks; tasting of apple crisp occurred over three different weeks. Tastings of the three recipes occurred one week apart. The three recipes were full sugar recipe (FS), reduced sugar recipe (RS) and reduced sugar plus spice recipe (RSS). Each subject was randomly assigned to one of the below sequence schedules for each taste test whereby A, B, and C refer to one of the three recipes (FS, RS, or RSS): Sequence 1: A, B, C Sequence 2: A, C, B Sequence 3: B, A, C Sequence 4: B, C, A Sequence 5: C, A, B Sequence 6: C, B, A |
Subjects tasted three items (apple crisp, tea and oatmeal) in a randomized sequence schedule to allow for tasting the three recipes (full sugar recipe, reduced sugar recipe and reduced sugar plus spice recipe) over three weeks.
Oatmeal and tea were served together as a breakfast meal and tastings of oatmeal and tea were done over 3 weeks and tastings for apple crisp (served alone) were done over 3 different weeks.
Subjects tasted one of the three recipes at each weekly seating.
Subjects tasted three items (apple crisp, tea and oatmeal) in a randomized sequence schedule to allow for tasting the three recipes (full sugar recipe, reduced sugar recipe and reduced sugar plus spice recipe) over three weeks.
Oatmeal and tea were served together as a breakfast meal and tastings of oatmeal and tea were done over 3 weeks and tastings for apple crisp (served alone) were done over 3 different weeks.
Subjects tasted one of the three recipes at each weekly seating.
Subjects tasted three items (apple crisp, tea and oatmeal) in a randomized sequence schedule to allow for tasting the three recipes (full sugar recipe, reduced sugar recipe and reduced sugar plus spice recipe) over three weeks.
Oatmeal and tea were served together as a breakfast meal and tastings of oatmeal and tea were done over 3 weeks and tastings for apple crisp (served alone) were done over 3 different weeks.
Subjects tasted one of the three recipes at each weekly seating.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
9-point hedonic scale rating instrument to rate meal satisfaction
Time Frame: The day of tasting (once per week for 3 weeks)
|
Overall liking of each meal with a 9-point hedonic scale rating instrument.
The scale is a 9-point likert scale with scores ranging from 1 - 9 to assess liking (where the lowest rating of 1 indicated extreme disliking and the highest rating of 9 indicated extreme liking).
|
The day of tasting (once per week for 3 weeks)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
9-point hedonic scale rating of the entree item (where applicable)
Time Frame: The day of tasting (once per week for 3 weeks)
|
Overall liking of the entree item of each meal with a 9-point hedonic scale rating instrument for each item.
The scale is a 9-point likert scale with scores ranging from 1 - 9 to assess liking (where the lowest rating of 1 indicated extreme disliking and the highest rating of 9 indicated extreme liking).
|
The day of tasting (once per week for 3 weeks)
|
|
9-point hedonic scale rating of the beverage item (where applicable)
Time Frame: The day of tasting (once per week for 3 weeks)
|
Over9-point hedonic scale ratingall liking of the beverage item of each meal with a instrument for each item.
The scale is a 9-point likert scale with scores ranging from 1 - 9 to assess liking (where the lowest rating of 1 indicated extreme disliking and the highest rating of 9 indicated extreme liking).
|
The day of tasting (once per week for 3 weeks)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: John C. Peters, PhD, University of Colorado, Denver
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Johnson RJ, Segal MS, Sautin Y, Nakagawa T, Feig DI, Kang DH, Gersch MS, Benner S, Sanchez-Lozada LG. Potential role of sugar (fructose) in the epidemic of hypertension, obesity and the metabolic syndrome, diabetes, kidney disease, and cardiovascular disease. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007 Oct;86(4):899-906. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/86.4.899.
- Krauss RM, Eckel RH, Howard B, Appel LJ, Daniels SR, Deckelbaum RJ, Erdman JW Jr, Kris-Etherton P, Goldberg IJ, Kotchen TA, Lichtenstein AH, Mitch WE, Mullis R, Robinson K, Wylie-Rosett J, St Jeor S, Suttie J, Tribble DL, Bazzarre TL. AHA Dietary Guidelines: revision 2000: A statement for healthcare professionals from the Nutrition Committee of the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2000 Oct 31;102(18):2284-99. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.102.18.2284. No abstract available.
- Essed NH, Kleikers S, van Staveren WA, Kok FJ, de Graaf C. No effect on intake and liking of soup enhanced with mono-sodium glutamate and celery powder among elderly people with olfactory and/or gustatory loss. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2009;60 Suppl 5:143-54. doi: 10.1080/09637480802710216. Epub 2009 May 21.
- Howard BV, Wylie-Rosett J. Sugar and cardiovascular disease: A statement for healthcare professionals from the Committee on Nutrition of the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism of the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2002 Jul 23;106(4):523-7. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000019552.77778.04. No abstract available. Erratum In: Circulation. 2003 Apr 29;107(16)2166.
- Trumbo P, Schlicker S, Yates AA, Poos M; Food and Nutrition Board of the Institute of Medicine, The National Academies. Dietary reference intakes for energy, carbohydrate, fiber, fat, fatty acids, cholesterol, protein and amino acids. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002 Nov;102(11):1621-30. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8223(02)90346-9. No abstract available. Erratum In: J Am Diet Assoc. 2003 May;103(5):563.
- King, SC, Snow, J, Meiselman, HL, Sainsbury, J, Carr, BT, McCafferty, D, Serrano, D, Gillette, M, Millard, L, Li, Q. Development of a questionnaire to measure consumer wellness associated with foods: The WellSense profile. Food Quality and Preference 39: 82-94, 2014.
- Littell, RC, Miliken, GA, Stroup, WW, Wolfinger, RD, Schabenberger, O, (eds.): SAS for Mixed Models, Second edn. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc, 2006.
- Malik VS, Popkin BM, Bray GA, Despres JP, Hu FB. Sugar-sweetened beverages, obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease risk. Circulation. 2010 Mar 23;121(11):1356-64. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.876185. No abstract available.
- Peters JC, Polsky S, Stark R, Zhaoxing P, Hill JO. The influence of herbs and spices on overall liking of reduced fat food. Appetite. 2014 Aug;79:183-8. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.04.019. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
- Polsky S, Beck J, Stark RA, Pan Z, Hill JO, Peters JC. The influence of herbs, spices, and regular sausage and chicken consumption on liking of reduced fat breakfast and lunch items. J Food Sci. 2014 Oct;79(10):S2117-26. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.12643. Epub 2014 Sep 12.
- McGuire S. U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2010. 7th Edition, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, January 2011. Adv Nutr. 2011 May;2(3):293-4. doi: 10.3945/an.111.000430. Epub 2011 Apr 30. No abstract available.
- Peters JC, Marker R, Pan Z, Breen JA, Hill JO. The Influence of Adding Spices to Reduced Sugar Foods on Overall Liking. J Food Sci. 2018 Mar;83(3):814-821. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.14069. Epub 2018 Feb 24.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- 14-1535
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Taste Testing
-
Wageningen UniversityAjinomoto Co., Inc.WithdrawnFood Intake Regulation | Umami Taste Perception | Sensory TestingNetherlands
-
Wageningen UniversityAjinomoto Co., Inc.Not yet recruitingEnergy Density | Food Intake Measurement | Sensory Testing | Umami TasteNetherlands
-
University of Colorado, DenverMcCormick Science InstituteCompletedNormal Subjects Who Agree to Participate in Taste Testing
-
Azienda Sanitaria Locale CN2 Alba-BraNot yet recruitingQuality of Life | Breast Cancer | Nutritional Status | Taste Disorders | Dysgeusia | Chemotherapy Effects | Taste Perception | Sensory Testing
-
Wageningen UniversityCompletedFood Intake Regulation | Taste Sensitivity | Palatability | Hedonic Function | Umami Taste PerceptionNetherlands
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)CompletedFeeding Behavior | Taste Sweet | Taste SaltyUnited States
-
Nutricia ResearchCompletedOncology | Taste, AlteredNetherlands
-
You First ServicesCompletedMedication Associated Metallic Taste , DysgeusiaUnited States
-
Dow University of Health SciencesCompleted
-
Purdue UniversityCompleted
Clinical Trials on apple crisp
-
University of Colorado, DenverMcCormick Science InstituteCompletedNormal Subjects Who Agree to Participate in Taste Testing
-
Swedish University of Agricultural SciencesUppsala UniversityCompletedAppetite RegulationSweden
-
Swedish University of Agricultural SciencesUppsala UniversityCompleted
-
NYU Langone HealthCompletedMultiple SclerosisUnited States
-
Seattle Children's HospitalRecruitingHeadache | Brain Concussion | Mild Traumatic Brain InjuryUnited States
-
Clinical Nutrition Research Center, Illinois Institute...Completed
-
Maastricht University Medical CenterCompleted
-
Clinical Research Center Kiel GmbHNofimaCompleted
-
Case Comprehensive Cancer CenterSuspendedGlioblastoma | Seizures | Venous ThromboembolismUnited States