Aging Stereotypes and Prodromal Alzheimer's Disease (AGING)

The Potential Impact of Aging Stereotypes in the Assessment of Memory Deficits and Screening for Prodromal State of Alzheimer's Disease

Because of the lengthening of life expectancy, more and more people are concerned with the effects of aging on their mental faculties (e.g., memory decline) and with the possibility of getting Alzheimer's Disease (AD) or other forms of dementia. This increasing awareness of AD has already resulted in a growing demand for neuropsychological testing. AD's research also emphasizes the need for early screening to improve the prediction of the disease progression and the efficacy of any future therapy. Such a drive to screen for pre-dementia raises the challenging issue of frontline identification of individuals in the preclinical or early clinical stages of AD. Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) is typically considered to be the prodromal state of AD, and is therefore at the core of the drive for early screening. Moreover, Pre-MCI so called SCI (Subjective Cognitive Impairment) can precede AD for 15 years. However, many individuals diagnosed with MCI do not convert to AD, some remaining stable and others even reversing back to normal (with rates of reversion to normal varying from 4.5% to as high as 53%). This over-diagnosis bias, which has been largely overlooked, is at the core of the present project at the interface of human and life sciences. Here, we argue that an important source of overdiagnosis in the prodromal state of AD comes from negative aging stereotypes (e.g., the culturally shared beliefs that aging inescapably causes severe cognitive decline and diseases such as AD) that permeate neuropsychological screening. There is ample evidence in the laboratory that such stereotypes contribute to the differences observed in the healthy population between younger and older adults in explicit memory tasks. Additionally, three pilot (lab) studies specifically conducted for the present ANR project showed that the threat of being judged stereotypically undermines the controlled use of memory of healthy older adults and simultaneously intensifies their automatic response tendencies, resulting in impaired memory performance. The present proposal goes several steps further by examining for the first time whether aging stereotypes are powerful enough to implicitly permeate the clinical neuropsychological testing and thus inflate memory deficits in older adults judged "at risk" (based on either epidemiological criteria or memory complaints), resulting in false-positive detection of SCI and MCI. This provocative hypothesis will be tested while 1) using biomarkers of neurodegeneration to distinguish false-positives from true MCI, and 2) using biomarkers of stress to examine whether and how aging stereotypes can lead to acute physiological stress during neuropsychological testing. This innovative project has the potential to offer new recommendations to improve the diagnosis accuracy of prodromal state of AD, with positive consequences for older people's wellbeing.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

260

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Marseille, France, 13354
        • Recruiting
        • Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Marseille
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Bernard MICHEL, PH

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

48 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients must be at least 50 years old
  • Patients must report memory complaints
  • Patients must show signs of MCI (amnestic single or multiple domain) on the following short cognitive tests

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Probable Alzheimer's Disease according to NINCDS-ADRDA criteria (MA patients will be excluded from the study because false-positive errors only concern MCI status, not AD)
  • Psychiatric disorders (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder)
  • Cranial trauma
  • Developmental pathologies
  • Depression (score greater than or equal to 10 on GDS)
  • Psychotropic medication if modified in the last 3 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard instruction
Neuropsychological tests
Neuroimaging biomarkers of neurodegeneration
Experimental: Reduced threat instruction
Neuropsychological tests
Neuroimaging biomarkers of neurodegeneration

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Neuropsychological tests
Time Frame: 48 months
Neuropsychological battery used for the diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI, amnestic single or multiple domain)
48 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Neuroimaging biomarkers of neurodegeneration
Time Frame: 48 months
Structural MRI (Hippocamp) and Florbetapir© PET (β-amyloid deposition)
48 months
Physiological stress
Time Frame: 48 months
cortisol, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and its sulfated stable form (DHEAS) from the HPA axis, and Immunoglobulin A (IgA).
48 months
Self-report questionnaires
Time Frame: 48 months
Vulnerability factors for stereotyping threat effects are assessed
48 months
Heart rate variability (thin elasticized heart rate transmitter belt),
Time Frame: 48 months
Physiological stress
48 months
Skin conductance (wristwatch)
Time Frame: 48 months
Physiological stress
48 months
Salivary biomarkers
Time Frame: 48 months
cortisol, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and its sulfated stable form (DHEAS) from the HPA axis, and Immunoglobulin A (IgA).
48 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 6, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 10, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

May 3, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 26, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 23, 2018

Last Verified

July 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)

3
Subscribe