The Effect of Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Feeding Arterial for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

October 16, 2018 updated by: Kun Yan, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute

The Clinical Value of Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Feeding Arterial for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

To evaluate a novel technique-ultrasound guided percutaneous abaltion of tumor feeding artery before RFA for liver malignancy.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Hepatocellular carcinoma is one of the most common tumor in clinical practice. In recent years, various local therapies, especially radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been proved safe and effective.The main limitation of RFA is that its therapeutic impact is significant compromised by blood flow cooling effect, especially in hypervascular HCC. Recent studies showed combined therapy of TACE and RFA can decrease the blood supply of tumor, increase ablated volume and therefore improve the outcome. However, TACE application is limited in patients who cannot tolerate this therapy due to the side effects of repeated TACE, poor liver function or previously legated hepatic artery. The present study is focus on "difficult-to-treat" HCC patients who are neither surgical candidates, nor TACE candidates. The investigators introduce the novel treatment mode that RFA followed ultrasound guided percutaneous ablation of tumur feeding arterial to treat these difficult cases and evaluate the clinical effect.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100142
        • Beijing Cancer Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. tumor number ≤3, maximum tumor size ≤5cm;
  2. accessibility of tumors via a percutaneous approach;
  3. tumor feeding artery can be detected by 3D contrast enhance ultrasound;
  4. platelet count ≥ 50,000/ml and INR <1.6;
  5. life expectancy more than 6 months
  6. Child grade A or B

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. patients who scheduled liver transplantation
  2. with extrahepatic metastasis
  3. women during menstruation, pregnancy, child birth and baby nursing period
  4. patients with severe mental disorder
  5. cardiopulmonary failure

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PAFA and tumor ablation
first percutaneous frequency ablation of tumor feeding artery and then ablation of tumor
percutaneous ablation of tumor feeding artery
Other Names:
  • percutaneous ablation of tumor feeding artery
ablation of tumor area directly
Other: tumor ablation
ablation of tumor directly
ablation of tumor area directly

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
completed tumor necrosis
Time Frame: 1 month
Contrast enhanced CT or MRI was examed to evaluate tumor necrosis 1 month after ablation.
1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
tumor recurrence
Time Frame: up to 36 months
tumor recurrence around the ablation zone
up to 36 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Kun Yan, master, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 22, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 4, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 4, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

May 8, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 17, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 16, 2018

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Liver Neoplasms

3
Subscribe