Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test to Quantify Enzyme Replacement Response in Pediatric Pompe Disease

May 14, 2017 updated by: Rambam Health Care Campus

Introduction: Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) with Myozyme improved the prospect of Pompe disease patients. Our aim was to evaluate ERT acute effect on exercise capacity in pediatric Pompe patients.

Methods: Pompe patients (10-19 years) were evaluated before and two days after ERT using cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), six minutes walking test (6MWT) and motor function test (GMFM-88).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Pompe disease is an inherited autosomal recessive glycogen storage disease caused by partial or total deficiency of acid α-glucosidase (GAA), resulting in the accumulation of glycogen in the lysosomes of skeletal muscles, heart, liver and other tissues. There is an inverse correlation between the amount of residual GAA activity and disease severity. The clinical phenotype varies with regard to age of onset, organ involvement, and severity of progression. In 2006, enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) with recombinant human GAA (Genzyme Corporation, Cambridge MA, USA) was approved and, since then, decisive modification of the course of the disease has been reported. Clinical studies in infants showed that ERT led to improvement in cardiac, respiratory and skeletal muscle functions, with achievement of independent walking, higher levels of physical activity, and survival beyond infancy.

Exercise capacity significantly affects Pompe patients' clinical picture and quality of life [5]. However, data on the effects of ERT on physiological variables related to exercise capacity is scarce. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is a well-known procedure to assess exercise capacity in adults and children in healthy and chronic conditions. Little is known regarding exercise capacity in the pediatric Pompe population. Our aim was to evaluate the acute effect of ERT on exercise capacity and different physiological variables in pediatric Pompe patients.

Patients were evaluated before and two days after ERT (20mg/kg/EOW). Each evaluation included CPET, pulmonary function tests, 6MWT and GMFM-88. All tests were carried out by the same experienced physician, exercise physiologist, and physiotherapist.

Visit 1: Patients arrived at that hospital at 7:00 am, vital signs were collected and a complete neuromuscular evaluation was carried out (gross motor function measure score sheet (GMFM-88), 6MWT, pre-CPET questionnaire (demographics, physical activity level, risk assessment, asthma/atopy/smoking history, family history), pulmonary function tests and CPET. Following the evaluation, at approximately 9 am, the patient started infusion of ERT.

Visit 2: Two days following visit 1, the patient arrived at the hospital at 2:00 pm, vital signs were assessed and GMFM-88, 6MWT, pulmonary function tests, and CPET were performed.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

5

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

8 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Pediatric Pompe patients diagnosed by a deficiency of acid alpha-glucosidase enzyme activity in dry blood spot and/or lymphocytes, followed by the study of the disease-causing mutations using DNA analysis of the GAA gene. Age ≥8 y/o, ERT ≥1 year, capable of cycling on a stationary bicycle.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pompe disease diagnosed by a deficiency of acid alpha-glucosidase enzyme activity in dry blood spot and/or lymphocytes, followed by the study of the disease-causing mutations using DNA analysis of the GAA gene
  • Age ≥8 y/o
  • ERT ≥1 year
  • Capable of cycling on a stationary bicycle.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Invasive ventilation
  • Continuous ventilation and/or continuous oxygen supplementation to maintain oxygen saturation >90%
  • Acute illness on visit day or one day prior.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Pediatric Pompe patients

Visit 1: Patients arrived at that hospital at 7:00 am, vital signs were collected and a complete neuromuscular evaluation was carried out (gross motor function measure score sheet (GMFM-88), 6MWT, pre-CPET questionnaire (demographics, physical activity level, risk assessment, asthma/atopy/smoking history, family history), pulmonary function tests and CPET. Following the evaluation, at approximately 9 am, the patient started infusion of ERT.

Visit 2: Two days following visit 1, the patient arrived at the hospital at 2:00 pm, vital signs were assessed and GMFM-88, 6MWT, pulmonary function tests, and CPET were performed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in oxygen Uptake
Time Frame: 3 days
Change in mount of oxygen consumed per amount of time measured during 15 minutes of an exercise test.
3 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
6 Minute walk test
Time Frame: 3 days
The distance an individual walked in 6 minutes.
3 days
Gross motor function measure score sheet (GMFM-88)
Time Frame: 3 days
The patient is evaluated in the active performance of 88 physical tasks and the scoring range for each task ranges from 0=does not initiate, 1=initiates, 2=partially completes, 3=completes, NT=not tested. The total score is the sum of all tasks divided to the maximal potential score in percentage. Evaluation time ~ 30 minutes.
3 days
Spirometry
Time Frame: 3 days.
Pulmonary function as assessed by spirometry. Evaluation time - 5 minutes.
3 days.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lea Bentur, Prof., Rambam Health Care Campus

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

March 30, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 30, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 7, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

May 10, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 16, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 14, 2017

Last Verified

May 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Enzyme Replacement Therapy in Pompe Disease

Subscribe