Ultrasound Guided Therapeutic Percutaneous Electrolysis in Achilles Tendinopathy.

March 2, 2023 updated by: Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor

Effectiveness of Therapeutic Percutaneous (EPTE®) Guided by Ultrasound as a Treatment of Achilles Tendinopathy. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Achilles tendon is a frequent lower-limb tissue where tendinopathy may arise. Percutaneous Therapeutic Electrolysis (EPTE®) is an electronic device that enables to treat accurately, guided by an ultrasound, the tendon injured area by applying a galvanic current through an acupuncture needle. Thus, the first stage of physiological regenerative process may be obtained. Design: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Objectives: To know the effectiveness of Percutaneous Therapeutic Electrolysis (EPTE®) versus a sham intervention at improving pain and function in patients who undergo Achilles Chronic Tendinopathy and to determine the efficiency of Percutaneous Therapeutic Electrolysis (EPTE®) with monopolar needle versus Percutaneous Therapeutic Electrolysis (EPTE®) with bipolar needle at improving pain and function in patients who undergo Achilles Chronic Tendinopathy. Participants: patients diagnosed with Achilles Chronic Tendinopathy. Setting. Infanta Leonor Hospital, Madrid, Spain. Experimental intervention: Percutaneous Therapeutic Electrolysis (EPTE®) with monopolar needle, 330 microamps, 1 min 20 sec versus bipolar needle. Sham intervention: the guide tube of the needle contacted with the skin and the device remained switched on to simulate its functioning.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Tendinopathy is a common injury among athletes, where the incidence reaches 50%. Nevertheless, industrial workers as well as sedentary subjects may also undergo this pain condition.

Achilles tendon is a frequent lower-limb tissue where tendinopathy may arise. Achilles tendinopathy risk factors have been detailed, such as: age, mechanical axis deviation of lower limbs, excessive training load dosage, and type of work activity. The middle portion of the tendon is the area where Achilles tendinopathy is most likely to be located. Interestingly, correlation between pain severity and the degree of tissue degeneration by imaging diagnosis is hardly showed in chronic tendinopathy conditions. Thus, chronic tendinopathy pain may be mediated not only by peripheral but by central mechanisms.

Percutaneous Therapeutic Electrolysis (EPTE® System; Manual EPTE, 2014 IONCLINICS & DEIONIC, S.L.) is an electronic device that enables to treat accurately, guided by an ultrasound, the tendon injured area by penetrating the skin with an acupuncture needle. A galvanic current goes through the device to the needle so that the first stage of physiological regenerative process may be obtained. That is due to a chemical reaction that leads to a controlled alkaline burn into the injured tissue and a subsequent basification of extracellular medium. That elicits an inflammatory response; the destroyed tissue is metabolized by phagocytosis process. Design: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Objectives: To know the effectiveness of Percutaneous Therapeutic Electrolysis (EPTE®) versus a sham intervention at improving pain and function in patients who undergo Achilles Chronic Tendinopathy, and to determine the efficiency of Percutaneous Therapeutic Electrolysis (EPTE®) with monopolar needle versus Percutaneous Therapeutic Electrolysis (EPTE®) with bipolar needle at improving pain and function in patients who undergo Achilles Chronic Tendinopathy. Participants: patients diagnosed with Achilles Chronic Tendinopathy. Setting. Infanta Leonor Hospital, Madrid, Spain. Experimental intervention: Percutaneous Therapeutic Electrolysis (EPTE®) with monopolar needle, 330 microamps, 1 min 20 sec versus bipolar needle. Sham intervention: the guide tube of the needle contacted with the skin and the electrolysis device remained switched on to simulate its functioning.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

96

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Madrid, Spain
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Universitario Inflanta Leonor
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Irene de la Rosa Diaz, Dr
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Ester Sanchez Rodriguez, MSc
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Rosalia de Dios Alvarez, Dr
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Natividad Plaza Andreu, Dr
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Manuel Benito Junquera, MSc
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Gema Lendinez Burgos, MSc
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Elena Barcina Garica, Dr
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Rosa Lorente Ramos, Dr

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- Achilles Chronic Tendinopathy diagnosis (from 3months up to 3 years)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Physical therapy treatment within the last 4 months.
  • Surgery approach for Achilles tendinopathy.
  • Pregnancy
  • Corticoid treatment in the last 4 months.
  • Pacemaker
  • Thrombophlebitis
  • Systemic disease
  • Cognitive disease
  • Prosthesis or osteosynthesis
  • Dermatopathies

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: Sham group
Simulating of the electrolysis application.he electrolysis technique was simulated to be delivered. The guide tube of the needle contacted with the skin, located on the painful area, and the device remained switched on to simulate its functioning.
The electrolysis technique was simulated to be delivered. The guide tube of the needle contacted with the skin, located on the painful area, and the device remained switched on to simulate its functioning.
Other Names:
  • Sham group
Experimental: Experimental group 1
Electrolysis application with monopolar needle.
Percutaneous Therapeutic Electrolysis (EPTE®) with monopolar needle, 330 microamps, 1 min 20 sec.
Other Names:
  • Electrolysis application with monopolar needle.
Experimental: Experimental group 2
Electrolysis application with bipolar needle.
Percutaneous Therapeutic Electrolysis (EPTE®) with bipolar needle, 120 microamps, 1 min 20 sec.
Other Names:
  • Electrolysis application with bipolar needle.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain intensity
Time Frame: 5 min
Measured by Numeric Pain Rating Scale. Punctuation from 0 point up to 10 points. "0" no pain; "10" the most bearable pain.
5 min

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Lower limb functionality
Time Frame: 10 min
Measured by Visa-A Scale. Punctuation from 0 point up to 100 points. "0"point the most inability; "100" points complete functionality.
10 min
Achilles tendon thickening
Time Frame: 5 min
Assessed by ultrasonography. Thickening was considered when the thickness is 50% greater than the contralateral limb.
5 min
Length of the most thickened area
Time Frame: 5 min
Assessed by ultrasonography. Distance (in mm) between the two extremes of the thickened area
5 min
Location of the most thickened area
Time Frame: 5 min
Assessed by ultrasonography. Distance (in mm) from the Achilles insertion up to the thickening onset.
5 min

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Javier Herraiz Garvin, MSc, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 28, 2023

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 24, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 24, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

May 30, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 3, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 2, 2023

Last Verified

February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HUILeonor

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ultrasonography

Clinical Trials on Sham comparator

Subscribe