Sham CPAP vs. Straight CPAP for Chronic Cough

June 4, 2020 updated by: Krishna M. Sundar

Prospective Study of Efficacy of Sham CPAP vs. Straight CPAP on Cough Intensity in Patients With Chronic Cough

Chronic cough is an important clinical problem in primary care and sub-specialty practice. Besides the distress experienced by patients with chronic cough, significant healthcare resources are expended to understand the role of gastroesophageal reflux, asthma and post-nasal drip in understanding their contribution to cough.

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is common in patients with chronic cough. More importantly, treatment of OSA with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) has led to improvement in cough for chronic cough patients. Mechanisms by which OSA therapy with CPAP can improve cough includes beneficial effects on reflux and airway inflammation.

The aim of this study is to definitively establish that CPAP therapy for treatment of OSA in chronic cough patients improves cough. While these patients with chronic cough are not routinely screened and treated for OSA, this study aims to evaluate these chronic cough patients with screening questionnaires for OSA and if necessary with polysomnography and randomize them to either CPAP or sham CPAP for 6 weeks.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

22

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84132
        • University of Utah

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Cough of more than 2 month duration
  • Not active smoker with history of stoppage of smoking for more than 6 months
  • Evaluation and treatment by other providers for suspected gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), upper airway cough syndrome (UACS), or cough-variant asthma (CVA) for at least 1 month
  • Normal chest radiography or computed tomography (CT) scans (patients with up to 2 lung nodules less than 3 mm will be allowed if there is no history of malignancy elsewhere)
  • Normal spirometry with predicted diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon dioxide (DLCO) more than 50% predicted. Pulmonary Function Test criteria: no evidence of airflow limitation (FEV1/FVC > 0.7) or significant chest restriction (FVC > 70% predicted) with predicted DLCO more than 50% predicted

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Recent pneumonia (less than 6 months)
  • Congestive heart failure, acute or chronic renal disease, jaundice or chronic liver disease, pulmonary embolism, stroke or neurodegenerative disease, malignancy
  • Use of supplemental oxygen or positive airway pressure therapy (if patients have been diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea in the past but were non-compliant with positive airway pressure therapy, they will not be excluded)
  • Use of opiates for cough suppression (opiate use for pain suppression can be included)
  • Alcoholism, drug dependence (including chewing tobacco) or illicit drug use
  • Esophageal cancer or laryngeal surgery
  • Craniofacial abnormalities that preclude CPAP placement

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Straight CPAP
Patients randomized to straight CPAP will receive 10 cm of air pressure, or as determined by the results of polysomnography, for 6 weeks. Following the 6-week visit, patients will be placed on straight CPAP with equipment approved by insurance for an additional 6 weeks.
SHAM_COMPARATOR: Sham CPAP
Patients randomized to sham CPAP will receive 1-2 cm of air pressure for 6 weeks. Following the 6-week visit, patients will be placed on straight CPAP with equipment approved by insurance for an additional 6 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Leicester Cough Questionnaire Score
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
Subjects will complete the Leicester Cough Questionnaire at the baseline and 6-week visits. The Leicester Cough Questionnaire comprises 19 items, which assess symptoms, or the impact of symptoms, over the last 2 weeks on a seven-point Likert scale. Scores in three domains (physical, psychological and social) are calculated as a mean for each domain (range 1 to 7). A total score (range 3 to 21) is also calculated by adding the domain scores together. Higher scores indicate better quality of life. The change in Leicester Cough Questionnaire score will be compared between the Straight CPAP and Sham CPAP groups
Baseline and 6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Cough Frequency
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
Subjects will wear a Leicester cough monitor for 24 hours at the baseline and 6-week visits, which will record cough frequency during that period. The change in cough frequency from baseline to 6 weeks will be compared between the Straight CPAP and SHAM CPAP groups
Baseline and 6 weeks
8 Isoprostane Level in Exhaled Breath Condensate
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
Samples of breath condensate will be collected from study subjects at the baseline and 6-week visits. The 8 isoprostane level from baseline to 6-weeks will be compared between the Straight CPAP and Sham CPAP groups
Baseline and 6 weeks
Interleukin-8 (IL-8) Level in Exhaled Breath Condensate
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
Samples of breath condensate will be collected from study subjects at the baseline and 6-week visits. IL-6 level from baseline to 6-weeks will be compared between the Straight CPAP and Sham CPAP groups
Baseline and 6 weeks
Nitrite/Nitrate (NOX) Level in Exhaled Breath Condensate
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
Samples of breath condensate will be collected from study subjects at the baseline and 6-week visits. NOX level from baseline to 6-weeks will be compared between the Straight CPAP and Sham CPAP groups.
Baseline and 6 weeks
Hydrogen Peroxide (H2O2) Level in Exhaled Breath Condensate
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
Samples of breath condensate will be collected from study subjects at the baseline and 6-week visits. H2O2 level from baseline to 6-weeks will be compared between the Straight CPAP and Sham CPAP groups
Baseline and 6 weeks
Change in Leukotriene B4 (LTB4) Level in Exhaled Breath Condensate
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
Samples of breath condensate will be collected from study subjects at the baseline and 6-week visits. The change in LTB4 level from baseline to 6-weeks will be compared between the Straight CPAP and Sham CPAP groups
Baseline and 6 weeks
Change in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Quality of Life (GERD-QoL) Questionnaire Score
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
Subjects will complete the GERD-QoL questionnaire at the baseline and 6-week visits. The GERD-QoL comprises 15 items on a five-point Likert scale; lowest possible score (0) = no symptoms, greatest possible score (75) = worst symptoms. The change in GERD-QoL score will be compared between the Straight CPAP and Sham CPAP groups
Baseline and 6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Krishna Sundar, MD, University of Utah

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

October 13, 2014

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

November 25, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

November 25, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 27, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 27, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

June 18, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 4, 2020

Last Verified

June 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB #62049

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on OSA

Clinical Trials on Straight CPAP

Subscribe