- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03180944
Lower Lugol's Solution Concentration on Reducing the Adverse Symptoms of Chromoendoscopy With Iodine Staining
January 7, 2020 updated by: Xiuli Zuo, Shandong University
This study was to test an optimal concentration of Lugol's solution which can reduce the mucosal irritation and provide high image quality to ensure endoscopy examination by a randomized blinded controlled trial.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Detailed Description
It is widely accepted that chromoendoscopy using Lugol's solution is effective for the detection of early esophageal squamous neoplasia.
However, this modality may cause severe chest pain and discomfort owing to mucosal irritation.
The conventional concentration of Lugol's solution is in the range of 1.2% to 2.5% .
Image quality can be guaranteed with this range of Lugol's solution.
However, lead to retrosternal pain and discomfort, and can even induce erosion or ulceration in the esophagus and stomach.
This study was to test whether a lower concentration of Lugol's solution, which has minimal mucosal irritation, can provide satisfied image quality by a randomized blinded controlled trial.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
200
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Shandong
-
Jinan, Shandong, China, 250012
- Qilu Hospital, Shandong University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
36 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients in the high-risk population of ESCC;
- or general risk population of ESCC between 40 to 74 years old. Definition of high-risk population of ESCC is list in supporting information33.
Exclusion criteria included the following:
- with obvious abnormalities in stomach, confirmed by either white-light endoscopy (WLE) or pCLE, including gastric cancer, acute erosive and hemorrhagic gastritis, chronic atrophic gastritis, H. pylori infection and severe bile reflux gastritis;
- advanced esophageal carcinoma;
- known esophageal surgery or endoscopic treatment;
- known esophageal radiotherapy or chemotherapy;
- esophageal stenosis;
- food retention;
- allergy to iodine or fluorescein sodium;
- hyperthyroid;
- coagulopathy;
- acute bleeding;
- severe organ failure;
- pregnant or breastfeeding women.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Screening
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: 1.2% Lugol's solution
This group patients were given concentrations of 1.2% Lugol's solution for chromoendoscopy.
|
This group patients were given concentrations of 1.2% Lugol's solution for chromoendoscopy.Then biopsy specimens will be taken at the well-demarcated unstained or less-stained lesions.
|
|
Experimental: 1.0% Lugol's solution
This group patients were given concentrations of 1.0% Lugol's solution for chromoendoscopy.
|
This group patients were given concentrations of 1.0% Lugol's solution for chromoendoscopy.Then biopsy specimens will be taken at the well-demarcated unstained or less-stained lesions.
|
|
Experimental: 0.8% Lugol's solution
This group patients were given concentrations of 0.8% Lugol's solution for chromoendoscopy.
|
This group patients were given concentrations of 0.8% Lugol's solution for chromoendoscopy.Then biopsy specimens will be taken at the well-demarcated unstained or less-stained lesions.
|
|
Experimental: 0.6% Lugol's solution
This group patients were given concentrations of 0.6% Lugol's solution for chromoendoscopy.
|
This group patients were given concentrations of 0.6% Lugol's solution for chromoendoscopy.Then biopsy specimens will be taken at the well-demarcated unstained or less-stained lesions.
|
|
Experimental: 0.4% Lugol's solution
This group patients were given concentrations of 0.4% Lugol's solution for chromoendoscopy.
|
This group patients were given concentrations of 0.4% Lugol's solution for chromoendoscopy.Then biopsy specimens will be taken at the well-demarcated unstained or less-stained lesions.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Image Quality
Time Frame: intraoperative
|
Image quality is blindly quantified by a 4-point scale from the endoscopists.
A higher score representing higher image quality.
|
intraoperative
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Tolerance
Time Frame: intraoperative
|
The 4-point scale was used to assess the tolerance of endoscopist to the esophageal spasm caused by Lugol's solution which prevent endoscopy from passing.
1-4 means the resistance as intolerable, tolerable, mild, or non-existing.
|
intraoperative
|
|
Gastric Mucosa Injury
Time Frame: 1 months
|
The gastric mucosal injury caused by Lugol's solution is defined as post-staining gastritis score minus pre-staining gastritis score in pCLE.
The confocal gastritis was graded 0 to 3,according to pit patterns, capillaries, and fluorescein leakage.
A higher score representing more serious injury.
|
1 months
|
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
Both a written and oral form of the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) was provided to the patients after the endoscopy examination, used for measuring patients' retrosternal pain, retrosternal discomfort, nausea, abdominal discomfort and others.
In NRS, 0 is painless, 10 is the most severe pain, less than 4 is mild pain (pain does not affect sleep), 4-6 is moderate pain, and more than 7 is severe pain (pain means unable to sleep or wake up from sleep).
|
24 hours
|
|
Severe Adverse Events
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
Severe adverse events includes allergic reactions, esophageal burns, spasms and even perforation.
|
24 hours
|
|
Histology analysis
Time Frame: 3-5days
|
All specimens were evaluated by two experienced pathologists blind to the groups of the patients.
The macroscopic and histologic diagnosis were made based on Paris classification and Vienna classification, respectively.
|
3-5days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Xiuli Zuo, PhD, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
September 1, 2017
Primary Completion (Actual)
November 30, 2018
Study Completion (Actual)
December 30, 2018
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
June 4, 2017
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 6, 2017
First Posted (Actual)
June 8, 2017
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
January 10, 2020
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 7, 2020
Last Verified
January 1, 2020
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2017SDU-QILU-G001
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Image Quality
-
Henry Ford Health SystemCompletedTEE Image QualityUnited States
-
Henry Ford Health SystemHenry Ford HospitalCompleted
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesRecruiting
-
University Health Network, TorontoCompletedComputed Tomography | Image Quality
-
Shandong UniversityUnknownImage Quality | Skin DiscolorationChina
-
Shandong UniversityCompletedChange of Image Quality of CLEChina
-
Karolinska InstitutetCompletedEvaluate CBCT Protocols in Subjective Image QualitySweden
-
Norwegian School of Sport SciencesUniversity of Agder; Ostfold University College; University College of Southeast...CompletedQuality of Life | Physical Activity | Dietary Habits | Body Image Disturbance | Body ImageNorway
-
Philips HealthcareCompletedCompare Image Quality Between SDCT and Conventional CT Images of Any Tissue Lesion, Determine Optimal Monochromatic Energy Level for a Coronary Artery ImageUnited States
-
Philips Clinical & Medical Affairs GlobalNot yet recruitingImage Quality | MR Multinuclear | Device Convenience | Device Stability | System Safety
Clinical Trials on 1.2% Lugol's solution
-
Shandong UniversityUnknownImage Quality of Early Esophageal Squamous Neoplasia | Endoscopists'Subjective AssessmentsChina
-
Istanbul UniversityCompleted
-
Aristotle University Of ThessalonikiActive, not recruiting
-
E-DA HospitalNational Taiwan University HospitalRecruitingEsophageal Squamous Cell NeoplasmTaiwan
-
Xijing Hospital of Digestive DiseasesAnkang Central Hospital; Xi'an International Medical Center Hospital; The First... and other collaboratorsCompletedEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaChina
-
Ruhr University of BochumCompleted
-
University of California, San FranciscoJohns Hopkins University; National Cancer Institute (NCI); Muhimbili University... and other collaboratorsRecruitingEsophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma | Esophageal Squamous DysplasiaTanzania
-
Zydolab - Institute of Cytology and Immune CytochemistryCompleted
-
Prof. Patrick PetignatRecruitingCervical Cancer | HPVCameroon
-
GE HealthcareABX CRO; H2O Clinical LLC; TransPerfect; Advanced Clinical, LLC; TFS; AG Mednet Inc.; ICON CEAC and other collaboratorsTerminatedHeart FailureUnited States, Spain, Canada, France, Netherlands, Poland, Czechia, Italy, Germany, Hungary