Lower Lugol's Solution Concentration on Reducing the Adverse Symptoms of Chromoendoscopy With Iodine Staining

January 7, 2020 updated by: Xiuli Zuo, Shandong University
This study was to test an optimal concentration of Lugol's solution which can reduce the mucosal irritation and provide high image quality to ensure endoscopy examination by a randomized blinded controlled trial.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

It is widely accepted that chromoendoscopy using Lugol's solution is effective for the detection of early esophageal squamous neoplasia. However, this modality may cause severe chest pain and discomfort owing to mucosal irritation. The conventional concentration of Lugol's solution is in the range of 1.2% to 2.5% . Image quality can be guaranteed with this range of Lugol's solution. However, lead to retrosternal pain and discomfort, and can even induce erosion or ulceration in the esophagus and stomach. This study was to test whether a lower concentration of Lugol's solution, which has minimal mucosal irritation, can provide satisfied image quality by a randomized blinded controlled trial.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

200

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Shandong
      • Jinan, Shandong, China, 250012
        • Qilu Hospital, Shandong University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

36 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients in the high-risk population of ESCC;
  • or general risk population of ESCC between 40 to 74 years old. Definition of high-risk population of ESCC is list in supporting information33.

Exclusion criteria included the following:

  • with obvious abnormalities in stomach, confirmed by either white-light endoscopy (WLE) or pCLE, including gastric cancer, acute erosive and hemorrhagic gastritis, chronic atrophic gastritis, H. pylori infection and severe bile reflux gastritis;
  • advanced esophageal carcinoma;
  • known esophageal surgery or endoscopic treatment;
  • known esophageal radiotherapy or chemotherapy;
  • esophageal stenosis;
  • food retention;
  • allergy to iodine or fluorescein sodium;
  • hyperthyroid;
  • coagulopathy;
  • acute bleeding;
  • severe organ failure;
  • pregnant or breastfeeding women.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1.2% Lugol's solution
This group patients were given concentrations of 1.2% Lugol's solution for chromoendoscopy.
This group patients were given concentrations of 1.2% Lugol's solution for chromoendoscopy.Then biopsy specimens will be taken at the well-demarcated unstained or less-stained lesions.
Experimental: 1.0% Lugol's solution
This group patients were given concentrations of 1.0% Lugol's solution for chromoendoscopy.
This group patients were given concentrations of 1.0% Lugol's solution for chromoendoscopy.Then biopsy specimens will be taken at the well-demarcated unstained or less-stained lesions.
Experimental: 0.8% Lugol's solution
This group patients were given concentrations of 0.8% Lugol's solution for chromoendoscopy.
This group patients were given concentrations of 0.8% Lugol's solution for chromoendoscopy.Then biopsy specimens will be taken at the well-demarcated unstained or less-stained lesions.
Experimental: 0.6% Lugol's solution
This group patients were given concentrations of 0.6% Lugol's solution for chromoendoscopy.
This group patients were given concentrations of 0.6% Lugol's solution for chromoendoscopy.Then biopsy specimens will be taken at the well-demarcated unstained or less-stained lesions.
Experimental: 0.4% Lugol's solution
This group patients were given concentrations of 0.4% Lugol's solution for chromoendoscopy.
This group patients were given concentrations of 0.4% Lugol's solution for chromoendoscopy.Then biopsy specimens will be taken at the well-demarcated unstained or less-stained lesions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Image Quality
Time Frame: intraoperative
Image quality is blindly quantified by a 4-point scale from the endoscopists. A higher score representing higher image quality.
intraoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tolerance
Time Frame: intraoperative
The 4-point scale was used to assess the tolerance of endoscopist to the esophageal spasm caused by Lugol's solution which prevent endoscopy from passing. 1-4 means the resistance as intolerable, tolerable, mild, or non-existing.
intraoperative
Gastric Mucosa Injury
Time Frame: 1 months
The gastric mucosal injury caused by Lugol's solution is defined as post-staining gastritis score minus pre-staining gastritis score in pCLE. The confocal gastritis was graded 0 to 3,according to pit patterns, capillaries, and fluorescein leakage. A higher score representing more serious injury.
1 months
Adverse Events
Time Frame: 24 hours
Both a written and oral form of the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) was provided to the patients after the endoscopy examination, used for measuring patients' retrosternal pain, retrosternal discomfort, nausea, abdominal discomfort and others. In NRS, 0 is painless, 10 is the most severe pain, less than 4 is mild pain (pain does not affect sleep), 4-6 is moderate pain, and more than 7 is severe pain (pain means unable to sleep or wake up from sleep).
24 hours
Severe Adverse Events
Time Frame: 24 hours
Severe adverse events includes allergic reactions, esophageal burns, spasms and even perforation.
24 hours
Histology analysis
Time Frame: 3-5days
All specimens were evaluated by two experienced pathologists blind to the groups of the patients. The macroscopic and histologic diagnosis were made based on Paris classification and Vienna classification, respectively.
3-5days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Xiuli Zuo, PhD, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 4, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 6, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

June 8, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 10, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 7, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Image Quality

Clinical Trials on 1.2% Lugol's solution

Subscribe