BioWick SureLock Clinical Outcomes Study

June 16, 2022 updated by: Zimmer Biomet

Efficacy of the BioWick SureLock Implant for the Reattachment of Soft Tissue to Bone in Subjects Undergoing Rotator Cuff Repairs

The purpose of this study is to collect postmarket data in subjects who receive surgical treatment of a full-thickness rotator cuff tear (of at least 1.5 cm) with the BioWick™ SureLock™ implant. Both performance and safety data will be collected.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Study Title Efficacy of the BioWick SureLock Implant for the Reattachment of Soft Tissue to Bone in Subjects Undergoing Rotator Cuff Repairs

Sponsor Cayenne Medical, Inc., a Zimmer Biomet company

Study Design The study is a prospective, non-randomized, open-label, single-arm study that includes both preoperative assessments and follow-up assessments at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.

Clinical Phase Postmarket

Number of Sites Up to ten sites in the U.S.

Study Duration per Subject Subjects will be enrolled in the study for up to 12 months.

Primary Objective The primary objective of this study is to assess survivorship (lack of reoperation/device removal) with the use of the BioWick SureLock implant.

Secondary Objective

The secondary objectives of this study are:

  • To document the postmarket effectiveness of the BioWick SureLock implant using ASES scores, VR-12 scores, and VAS scores, with the corresponding assessments made at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperative.
  • To document the postmarket effectiveness of the BioWick SureLock implant using range of motion (ROM) measurements with the corresponding assessments made at 3 months and 6 months postoperative.
  • To document device safety via device-related adverse events reported over the course of the study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

71

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85016
        • The Orthopaedic Clinic Association
    • California
      • Rancho Mirage, California, United States, 92270
        • Eisenhower Medical Center
    • Florida
      • Brandon, Florida, United States, 33511
        • Orthopaedic Medical Group of Tampa Bay PA
      • Temple Terrace, Florida, United States, 33637
        • Foundation for Orthopaedic Research and Eduation
    • Kentucky
      • Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40241
        • Norton Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84108
        • University of Utah
    • Virginia
      • Charlottesville, Virginia, United States, 22903
        • University of Virginia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Clinical diagnosis of rotator cuff tear which is greater than or equal to 1.5 cm and less than or equal to 4.0 cm full thickness of either the supraspinatus or infraspinatus determined by MRI which has not been previously repaired;
  2. Goutallier Stage 2 or less;
  3. Patte Stage II (mid humeral head retraction);
  4. Tear(s) confirmed intra-operatively by calibrated probe, tears measured in both anterior-posterior and medial-lateral planes;
  5. Subject is skeletally mature at the surgical site;
  6. Subject is able to read and understand the ICF and has voluntarily provided written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Clinical diagnosis of a rotator cuff tear of the subscapularis that requires repair (not including debridement);
  2. Conditions which, in the opinion of the Principal Investigator, may limit the subject's ability or willingness to follow postoperative care or study instructions;
  3. If female, subject is pregnant;
  4. Presence of local or systemic infection;
  5. Suprascapular nerve compression requiring release or documented by EMG-NCV;
  6. Substance abuse, including tobacco, alcohol, or illicit drugs which, in the investigator's judgment, could impair healing or influence study compliance;
  7. Foreign body sensitivity. If material sensitivity is suspected, testing should be completed prior to device implantation;
  8. Insufficient blood supply or previous infection which may hinder the healing process;
  9. Subject conditions including: insufficient quantity or quality of bone or soft tissue, or immature bone where the device may impact or disrupt the growth plate;
  10. Subject is a prisoner or member of another vulnerable population;
  11. Cortisone injection within 6 weeks prior to surgical treatment;
  12. Use of immune suppressants or chemotherapeutic medications within the last 12 months;
  13. Use of systemic corticosteroids at any daily dose for more than 1 month within the last 12 months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: BioWick SureLock Implant
All subjects are part of a single arm. All subjects received the BioWick SureLock implant.
The BioWick SureLock implant is a device for shoulder and extremity surgery, constructed of Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene Suture. BioWick SureLock is uniquely designed to minimize these risks by avoiding manual tensioning with an inserter mechanism that ensures that the implant is consistently deployed below the cortex.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Not Requiring Removal or Reoperation of the Implant
Time Frame: 12 months
The primary endpoint of this study is survivorship (lack of reoperation/device removal) at 12 months postoperative. Implant survivorship for each subject was determined by whether the subject underwent a revision or reoperation of the study device. Survivorship was assessed using a Kaplan-Meier analysis. Possible scores range from 0% (lowest survivorship) to 100% (highest survivorship).
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Not Requiring Removal or Reoperation of the Implant
Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months
Implant survivorship (lack of reoperation/device removal) at 3 months and 6 months postoperative. Implant survivorship for each subject was determined by whether the subject underwent a revision or reoperation of the study device. Survivorship was assessed using a Kaplan-Meier analysis. Possible scores range from 0% (lowest survivorship) to 100% (highest survivorship).
3 months, 6 months
American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Patient Self-Evaluation Score
Time Frame: Preoperative, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year
Pain and function as measured by the American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) questionnaire. ASES consists of 3 subcomponent scores including pain, instability, and activities of daily living. The pain score can be 0 to 10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain imaginable. The instability score can be 0 to 10 with 0 being no instability and 10 being the worst instability imaginable. The activities of daily living consists of 10 questions with ordinal responses of 0, 1, 2, and 3 with 3 involving no limitation and 0 is unable to do. The 3 subcomponents combine to make the overall ASES score which can range from 0 to 100 with 0 being the worst possible score and 100 being the best.
Preoperative, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score
Time Frame: Preoperative, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year
A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is a measurement instrument that tries to measure a characteristic or attitude that is believed to range across a continuum of values and cannot easily be directly measured. It is often used in epidemiologic and clinical research to measure the intensity or frequency of various symptoms. Possible scores range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (very much pain).
Preoperative, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year
The Veterans RAND 12 (VR-12) Item Health Survey Physical Score
Time Frame: Preoperative, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year
A brief, generic, multi-use, self-administered health survey comprised of 12 items. The instruments are primarily used to measure health-related quality of life, to estimate disease burden, and to evaluate the disease-specific impact on general and selected populations. A higher VR-12 score indicates better health (0-100 scale).
Preoperative, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year
The Veterans RAND 12 (VR-12) Item Health Survey Mental Score
Time Frame: Preoperative, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year
A brief, generic, multi-use, self-administered health survey comprised of 12 items. The instruments are primarily used to measure health-related quality of life, to estimate disease burden, and to evaluate the disease-specific impact on general and selected populations. A higher VR-12 score indicates better health (0-100 scale).
Preoperative, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year
Range of Motion (ROM) - Active Forward Elevation
Time Frame: Preoperative, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year
Range of motion (ROM): The full movement potential of a joint, usually its range of flexion and extension. Normal range for active forward elevation is 150-180 degrees.
Preoperative, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year
Device Safety
Time Frame: 1 year
Safety evaluations were based on the frequency and incidence of device-related adverse events. Device-related adverse events included all reported adverse events classified as "Definitely" or "Possibly" related to the device. Adverse event data were collected throughout the entire duration of the study from enrollment thru subject completion. Routine collection occurred at each visit (3 months, 6 months, and 1 year). Additional details of reports of adverse events can be found in the Adverse Events section of the posted results.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Ryan Boylan, ryan.boylan@zimmerbiomet.com

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 26, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 5, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

May 5, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 22, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 22, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

June 26, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 7, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 16, 2022

Last Verified

June 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CAY-001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rotator Cuff Tear

Clinical Trials on BioWick SureLock Implant

Subscribe