The Incremental Risk of Intraoperative Fentanyl on PONV

August 5, 2019 updated by: University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

The Incremental Risk of Intraoperative Fentanyl on PONV: A Modifiable Risk Without Drawbacks?

The aim of this quality control study is to describe the presence and intensity of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and its correlation with intraoperative fentanyl dosing. Additionally, the investigators will examine pain scores.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The primary aims of this quality control study are:

  1. to determine whether there is an independent association between the intraoperative administration of fentanyl (both as a continuous and categorical variable) and PONV within 24 postoperative hours
  2. determine whether or not the intraoperative fentanyl amount can be used to successfully restratify patients for PONV beyond the simplified Apfel score for PONV

All required data is collected in regular daily practice. The following variables will be assessed by univariable models:

Preoperative variables (e.g. patient characteristics) Surgical/Anesthesia variables (e.g. type/length of surgery, antiemetics) Outcome variables (PONV, worst pain as delineated in the outcomes section), Intraoperative fentanyl measured 1) as a continuous variable and 2) by predefined limits of 0 to 0.2mg, >0.2-0.5mg, >0.5 to 0.8mg, and >8mg.

Finally for the multivariable model, the investigators will adjust for confounders, specifically for sex (m/f), history (Hx) of PONV (y/n), Hx of motion sickness (y/n), current smoker (y/n), age (years), expected duration of surgery (min; >60 min), postoperative opioids (y/n), the use of preemptive PONV Therapy (0,1,2 medications), propofol vs. inhalative agents (y/n), and surgery type (3 kinds) from the patient's electronic record. In the event that insufficient event rates are observed, we will collapse the variables into the simplified Apfel score to assess the independent value of fentanyl in predicting PONV.

In addition to a logistic model as delineated above, we will conduct the following:

  1. receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of the logistic model without fentanyl, with fentanyl (continuous), and with fentanyl (categorical).
  2. additionally, ROCs of a simplified model using the Apfel score, the Apfel score with fentanyl (continous), and the Apfel score with fentanyl (categorical) will be made. Comparison of area under the receiver operating characteristics(AUROCs) by DeLong
  3. net reclassification improvement (NRI) of both the logistic model with and without fentanyl as well as the Apfel score with and without fentanyl

To assess pain and administered fentanyl, we will examine pain scores by the numeric rating scale (NRS).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

363

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Basel, Switzerland, 4031
        • Universitiy Hospital Basel

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with an elevated PONV risk undergoing abdominal, gynecological, or otorhinolaryngological in-patient surgery

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • In-patients with an expected simplified Apfel score of 2 or higher,
  • Aged >= 18 years, and
  • Undergoing general anesthesia (with or without neuraxial or regional anesthesia.)
  • in abdominal, gynecological or otorhinolaryngological surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Outpatients
  • Patients with chronic pain, defined as recurring pain requiring intermittent hospitalization or regular intake of pain medication.
  • Non-opioid naïve patients, defined as a history of abuse or having taken opioids within the last 30 days

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Any postoperative nausea and/or vomiting (PONV) within 24 hours after surgery
Time Frame: within 24 hours (or next morning discharge)
postoperative nausea and/or vomiting (PONV) yes/no (either by chart or by patient confirmation) within 24 hours (or next morning discharge)
within 24 hours (or next morning discharge)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
number of postoperative vomiting events within 24 hours
Time Frame: within 24 hours (or next morning discharge)
Number of times vomiting (0, 1-2, >3 times; either by chart or by patient confirmation) within 24 hours (or next morning discharge)
within 24 hours (or next morning discharge)
Any postoperative nausea and/or vomiting (PONV) while in the recovery room
Time Frame: first two postoperative hours
Postoperative nausea and/or vomiting (PONV) yes/no (either by chart or by patient confirmation) while in recovery room
first two postoperative hours
Worst pain, i.e. highest Numeric Rating Score (NRS)
Time Frame: within 24 hours / in recovery room (first two postoperative hours)
highest / worst pain score within 24 hours / in recovery room (defined as above)
within 24 hours / in recovery room (first two postoperative hours)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dose of postoperative administration of opioids
Time Frame: within 24 hours / in recovery room (first two postoperative hours)
quantification of postoperative administration of opioids 24 hours/recovery room
within 24 hours / in recovery room (first two postoperative hours)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Oliver Bandschapp, PD Dr., University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
  • Principal Investigator: Wilhelm Ruppen, PD Dr., University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
  • Principal Investigator: Eckhard Mauermann, MD, MSc, University Hospital Basel; University Hospital Ghent

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 17, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 27, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

June 28, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 6, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 5, 2019

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on PONV

3
Subscribe