Impact of GDT in Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Urological Surgery for Low to Moderate Risk Patients

April 4, 2018 updated by: Ronak Raval, Loma Linda University

Impact of Goal Directed Fluid Therapy in Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Urological Surgery for Low to Moderate Risk Patients

Robot assisted urological procedures are often long surgical cases that can potentially result in complicated postoperative hospital course. The amount of intravenous (IV) fluids administered to patients during these operations fluctuates based on the length of the case, surgical blood loss, hemodynamic monitors, and the discretion of the anesthesiologist. The goal of intraoperative fluid therapy is to maintain optimal tissue perfusion without causing fluid overload. We plan to use a goal directed fluid therapy protocol to optimize fluid status and analyze post-operative outcomes.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Loma Linda, California, United States, 92354
        • Loma Linda University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic urological procedures in which the patient would have an arterial catheter placed as part of their routine inoperative anesthetic management

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age less than 18;
  • current pregnancy;
  • history of congestive heart failure, arrhythmias, coagulopathy, cerebral vascular disease , COPD, significant liver or renal impairment, required FloTrac per treating anesthesiologist;
  • patient refusal to consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control Group
The control group will be administered intraoperative fluids throughout his or her surgery per the discretion of the anesthesiologist as is typical for this type of case. They will use an arterial line but without a FloTrac and therefore will have no data regarding the SVV.
Intraoperative fluids will be administer per the discretion of anesthesia provider and not per SVV data or study protocol.
Experimental: Treatment Group
The treatment group will receive a FloTrac arterial line that will allow the anesthesiologist to administer intraoperative fluids based on the study algorithm.
FloTrac arterial line data will be used to administer fluid bolus, based on study algorithm.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative ileus
Time Frame: Up to 3 weeks postoperatively
Time postoperatively to first bowel movement
Up to 3 weeks postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acute kidney injury
Time Frame: Up to 3 weeks postoperatively
Will be measured using the KDIGO criteria (UOP and Cr)
Up to 3 weeks postoperatively
Respiratory compromise
Time Frame: Up to 3 weeks postoperatively
Patients that require oxygen or invasive/non-invasive mechanical ventilation postoperatively
Up to 3 weeks postoperatively
Need for diuresis
Time Frame: Up to 3 weeks postoperatively
Use of a diuretic medication (ex. lasix, metolazone)
Up to 3 weeks postoperatively
Hospital length of stay
Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks postoperatively
Duration of stay in the hospital
Up to 4 weeks postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

December 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 6, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 7, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

July 11, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 5, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 4, 2018

Last Verified

April 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 5170073

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypovolemia

Clinical Trials on Control Group

Subscribe