Drug Use Surveillance of Vonoprazan for "Gastric Ulcer, Duodenal Ulcer, and Reflux Esophagitis"

November 21, 2019 updated by: Takeda

Drug Use Surveillance of Takecab Tablets for "Gastric Ulcer, Duodenal Ulcer, and Reflux Esophagitis"

The purpose of this survey is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of vonoprazan tablets in patients with gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer, and reflux esophagitis in the routine clinical setting.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The drug being tested in this survey is called vonoprazan. Vonoprazan is being tested to treat patients who have gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer, and reflux esophagitis.

This survey will look at the safety and effectiveness of vonoprazan in patients with gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer, and reflux esophagitis in the routine clinical setting. The survey will enroll approximately 3000 participants.

- Vonoprazan 20 mg

This multi-center survey will be conducted in Japan.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

3183

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Tokyo, Japan
        • Takeda Selected Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population will consist of participants with a diagnosis of gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer, and reflux esophagitis and receive Vonoprazan in the routine clinical setting.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- Participants with gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer, and reflux esophagitis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants with previous history of hypersensitivity to ingredients in Takecab tablets
  • Participants taking atazanavir sulfate or rilpivirine hydrochloride
  • Participants meeting the criteria of scarring stage (S1, S2) of endoscopic classification defined by Sakita and Miwa at the start of the treatment with Takecab tablets, in the case that the target disease is gastric ulcer or duodenal ulcer
  • Participants meeting the criteria of Grade N or Grade M of Los Angeles classification (Hoshihara's modification) at the start of the treatment with Takecab tablets, in the case that the target disease is reflux esophagitis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Vonoprazan 20 mg
The usual adult dosage for oral use is 20 mg of vonoprazan administered orally once daily. An 8-week treatment for gastric ulcer and a 6-week treatment for duodenal ulcer. For reflux esophagitis, the usual adult dosage for oral use was administered for a total of 4 weeks of treatment, and if that dosing proved insufficient, the administration may have been extended, but for no longer than 8 weeks of treatment. Participants received vonoprazan as part of a routine medical care.
Vonoprazan tablets
Other Names:
  • Takecab tablets
  • TAK-438

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Gastric Ulcer Who Had One or More Adverse Drug Reactions
Time Frame: Up to 8 weeks
An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Adverse drug reaction refers to AE related to the administered drug.
Up to 8 weeks
Percentage of Participants With Duodenal Ulcer Who Had One or More Adverse Drug Reactions
Time Frame: Up to 6 weeks
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Adverse drug reaction refers to AE related to the administered drug.
Up to 6 weeks
Percentage of Participants With Reflux Esophagitis Who Had One or More Adverse Drug Reactions
Time Frame: Up to 8 weeks
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Adverse drug reaction refers to AE related to the administered drug.
Up to 8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Endoscopic Cure Rate in Participants With Gastric Ulcer
Time Frame: Up to 8 weeks
Endoscopic cure rate was defined as a percentage of participants treated for gastric ulcer who classified as Scarring stage at the end of survey per Sakita-Miwa Classification. Endoscopic findings of ulcer were classified per Sakita-Miwa Classification as follows; Active stage: A1 and A2, Healing stage: H1 and H2, Scarring stage: S1 and S2.
Up to 8 weeks
Endoscopic Cure Rate in Participants With Duodenal Ulcer
Time Frame: Up to 6 weeks
Endoscopic cure rate was defined as a percentage of participants treated for duodenal ulcer who classified as Scarring stage at the end of survey per Sakita-Miwa Classification. Endoscopic findings of ulcer were classified per Sakita-Miwa Classification as follows; Active stage: A1 and A2, Healing stage: H1 and H2, Scarring stage: S1 and S2.
Up to 6 weeks
Endoscopic Cure Rate in Participants With Reflux Esophagitis
Time Frame: Up to 8 weeks
Endoscopic cure rate was defined as a percentage of participants who treated for reflux esophagitis and met the criteria of Grade N or M in the modified Los Angeles (LA) classification at the end of survey. Grade N: normal mucosa; Grade M: minimal changes to the mucosa, such as erythema and/or whitish turbidity.
Up to 8 weeks
Percentage of Participants With Gastric Ulcer Whose Subjective Symptoms Improved
Time Frame: Baseline and at the end of the survey (up to 8 weeks)
Percentage of participants who treated for gastric ulcer and whose subjective symptoms, including heartburn, acid reflux, postprandial fullness, early satiation, epigastric pain, epigastric burning, abdominal bloating, nausea/vomiting, belching and anorexia, were improved was reported. Presence or absence and severity of subjective symptoms were graded as asymptomatic, mild (occasionally or slightly symptomatic), moderate (considerably symptomatic), and severe (unendurably symptomatic). Participants with whose subjective symptom was improved by one grade or better were defined as "Improved".
Baseline and at the end of the survey (up to 8 weeks)
Percentage of Participants With Duodenal Ulcer Whose Subjective Symptoms Improved
Time Frame: Baseline and at the end of the survey (up to 6 weeks)
Percentage of participants who treated for duodenal ulcer and whose subjective symptoms, including heartburn, acid reflux, postprandial fullness, early satiation, epigastric pain, epigastric burning, abdominal bloating, nausea/vomiting, belching and anorexia, were improved was reported. Presence or absence and severity of subjective symptoms were graded as asymptomatic, mild (occasionally or slightly symptomatic), moderate (considerably symptomatic), and severe (unendurably symptomatic). Participants with whose subjective symptom was improved by one grade or better were defined as "Improved".
Baseline and at the end of the survey (up to 6 weeks)
Percentage of Participants With Reflux Esophagitis Whose Subjective Symptoms Improved
Time Frame: Baseline and at the end of the survey (up to 8 weeks)
Percentage of participants who treated for reflux esophagitis and whose subjective symptoms, including heartburn, acid reflux, postprandial fullness, early satiation, epigastric pain, epigastric burning, abdominal bloating, nausea/vomiting, belching and anorexia, were improved was reported. Presence or absence and severity of subjective symptoms were graded as asymptomatic, mild (occasionally or slightly symptomatic), moderate (considerably symptomatic), and severe (unendurably symptomatic). Participants with whose subjective symptom was improved by one grade or better were defined as "Improved".
Baseline and at the end of the survey (up to 8 weeks)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 9, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 10, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

July 12, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 12, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 21, 2019

Last Verified

November 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

Takeda makes patient-level, de-identified data sets and associated documents available for all interventional studies after applicable marketing approvals and commercial availability have been received (or program is completely terminated), an opportunity for the primary publication of the research and final report development has been allowed, and other criteria have been met as set forth in Takeda's Data Sharing Policy (see www.TakedaClinicalTrials.com for details). To obtain access, researchers must submit a legitimate academic research proposal for adjudication by an independent review panel, who will review the scientific merit of the research and the requestor's qualifications and conflict of interest that can result in potential bias. Once approved, qualified researchers who sign a data sharing agreement are provided access to these data in a secure research environment.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gastric Ulcer, Duodenal Ulcer, and Reflux Esophagitis

Clinical Trials on Vonoprazan

Subscribe