Pragmatic Trial Comparing Symptom-Oriented Versus Routine Stress Testing in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (POST PCI)

April 3, 2022 updated by: Seung-Jung Park

a Multi-center, Open-label, Nationwide Registry-based, Randomized, Pragmatic Trial Comparing 2 Post-PCI Management Strategies in High-risk PCI Patients With Complex Clinical and Lesion Characteristics

The primary objective of the POST-PCI trial is to compare the clinical outcomes of a post-percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) aggressive management strategy of routine noninvasive functional testing to a usual-care strategy of symptom-oriented functional testing in patients with high risk clinical, anatomical, and procedural characteristics who received PCI with contemporary drug-eluting stent and bioresorbable vascular scaffold.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1700

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Chuncheon, Korea, Republic of
        • Gangwon National Univ. Hospital
      • Daegu, Korea, Republic of
        • Daegu Catholic University Medical Center
      • Daegu, Korea, Republic of
        • Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center
      • Daejeon, Korea, Republic of
        • Chungnam National University Hospital
      • Seongnam, Korea, Republic of
        • Bundang CHA Hospital
      • Seongnam, Korea, Republic of
        • Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Asan Medical Center
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Eulji General Hospital
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • The Catholic University of Korea, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital
      • Suwon, Korea, Republic of
        • The Catholic University of Korea, St. Vincent'S Hospital
      • Wonju, Korea, Republic of
        • Wonju Severance Christian Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject was > 19 years of age.
  2. Subjects who underwent successful percutaneous coronary intervention with contemporary drug eluting stent, contemporary Bioresorbable Scaffold or drug eluting balloon at In-stent restenosis (ISR) lesion.
  3. Patients must have at least one of the following high-risk clinical, lesion, or procedure-related risk factors.

    3-1. Clinical factors; diabetes, renal insufficiency/failure, enzyme positive acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (STEMI or NSTEMI).

    3-2. Lesion- or procedure-related factors ; left main lesion, bifurcation lesion, ostial lesion, chronic total occlusion lesion, multivessel disease (≥ 2 vessels stented), restenotic lesion, diffuse long lesion (lesion length ≥30 mm or stent length ≥32 mm), or vein bypass graft stented

  4. The patient or guardian agrees to the study protocol and the schedule of clinical follow-up, and provides informed, written consent, as approved by the appropriate Institutional Review Board/Ethical Committee of the respective clinical site.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Cardiogenic shock at the index admission
  2. Subject treated with only bare metal stent or balloon angioplasty during the index procedure.
  3. Pregnant and/or lactating women.
  4. Concurrent medical condition with a life expectancy of less than 1 years
  5. Patients who are actively participating in another drug or device investigational study, which have not completed the primary endpoint follow-up period.

6 Subject was unable to provide written informed consent or participate in long-term follow-up.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: No Routine stress testing after PCI
In the group of symptom oriented stress testing group, the preselected functional test (exercise ECG, nuclear stress testing, or stress echocardiography) will be performed when chest pain or angina symptom is occured after the procedure according to the practice pattern of each participating center.
Experimental: Routine stress testing at 9~15 months after PCI
In the group of routine stress testing group, the preselected functional test (exercise ECG, nuclear stress testing, or stress echocardiography) will be performed at 9~15 months after the procedure according to the practice pattern of each participating center.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
composite of major cardiovascular events
Time Frame: 2 year
a composite of major cardiovascular events that included death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for unstable angina.
2 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Death
Time Frame: 2 year
2 year
Myocardial infarction
Time Frame: 2 year
2 year
Unstable angina hospitalization
Time Frame: 2 year
2 year
Death or myocardial infarction
Time Frame: 2 year
2 year
Any hospitalization
Time Frame: 2 year
cardiac cause vs. noncardiac cause
2 year
Invasive catheterization
Time Frame: 2 year
2 year
Repeat revascularization procedure
Time Frame: 2 year
Repeat revascularization procedure during follow-up; target vs. non-target lesion (or vessel), ischemia-driven vs. not ischemia-driven.
2 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 15, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 13, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 13, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

July 14, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 5, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 3, 2022

Last Verified

April 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Disease With Myocardial Infarction

Clinical Trials on No Routine stress testing

3
Subscribe