Cocaine Use Reduction and Health (RCT (04))

July 31, 2024 updated by: William Stoops

Cardiovascular, Immune and Psychosocial Benefits of Reduced Cocaine Use

Reduced drug use is a clinically meaningful target for treatment development, but few studies have evaluated the positive impacts produced by this behavioral change, preventing adoption of this endpoint in clinical trials. The proposed research will fill that critical knowledge gap by demonstrating the biopsychosocial benefits of reduced cocaine use. These data will be used to change current accepted cocaine treatment endpoints and accelerate identification of therapies for cocaine use disorder.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

127

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Kentucky
      • Lexington, Kentucky, United States, 40536
        • University Of Kentucky

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 or older
  • Self-report of recent cocaine use verified by a cocaine-positive urine sample
  • Meet moderate-severe Cocaine Use Disorder Criteria
  • Seeking treatment for their cocaine use
  • Able to commit to 12-week intervention, plus 24-week follow up

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of serious physical or psychiatric disease (e.g., physical dependence on any drug requiring medically managed detoxification, unstable angina, uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia, aortic stenosis, self-reported compromised immune function, extreme hypersensitivity/allergy to candida yeast or similar products, severe diagnosis for other substance use disorder) that would interfere with study participation
  • Current physical or psychiatric disease that would interfere with study participation
  • Poor veinous access, precluding blood draws

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control Group
This group will receive payment for providing urine samples throughout the trial.
Experimental: Low Value Alternative Reinforcer Group
This group will receive payment for providing cocaine negative urine samples throughout the trial.
Subjects will receive payments for providing cocaine negative urine samples.
Experimental: High Value Alternative Reinforcer Group
This group will receive payment for providing cocaine negative urine samples throughout the trial.
Subjects will receive payments for providing cocaine negative urine samples.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Endothelin-1 Levels
Time Frame: At baseline.
Endothelin-1 levels will be measured. They will be recorded in pg/ml.
At baseline.
Endothelin-1 Levels
Time Frame: Week 6 of study participation
Endothelin-1 levels will be measured. They will be recorded in pg/ml.
Week 6 of study participation
Endothelin-1 Levels
Time Frame: Week 12 of study participation
Endothelin-1 levels will be measured. They will be recorded in pg/ml.
Week 12 of study participation
Mean Arterial Pressure
Time Frame: At baseline
Mean Arterial Pressure is recorded during participant visits and is recorded in mm Hg
At baseline
Mean Arterial Pressure
Time Frame: Week 1 of participation
Mean Arterial Pressure was recorded during subject visits and is recorded in mm Hg
Week 1 of participation
Mean Arterial Pressure
Time Frame: Week 2 of participation
Mean Arterial Pressure was recorded during subject visits and is recorded in mm Hg
Week 2 of participation
Mean Arterial Pressure
Time Frame: Week 3 of participation
Mean Arterial Pressure was recorded during subject visits and is recorded in mm Hg
Week 3 of participation
Mean Arterial Pressure
Time Frame: Week 4 of participation
Mean Arterial Pressure was recorded during subject visits and is recorded in mm Hg
Week 4 of participation
Mean Arterial Pressure
Time Frame: Week 5 of participation
Mean Arterial Pressure was recorded during subject visits and is recorded in mm Hg
Week 5 of participation
Mean Arterial Pressure
Time Frame: Week 6 of participation
Mean Arterial Pressure was recorded during subject visits and is recorded in mm Hg
Week 6 of participation
Mean Arterial Pressure
Time Frame: Week 7 of participation
Mean Arterial Pressure was recorded during subject visits and is recorded in mm Hg
Week 7 of participation
Mean Arterial Pressure
Time Frame: Week 8 of participation
Mean Arterial Pressure was recorded during subject visits and is recorded in mm Hg
Week 8 of participation
Mean Arterial Pressure
Time Frame: Week 9 of participation
Mean Arterial Pressure was recorded during subject visits and is recorded in mm Hg
Week 9 of participation
Mean Arterial Pressure
Time Frame: Week 10 of participation
Mean Arterial Pressure was recorded during subject visits and is recorded in mm Hg
Week 10 of participation
Mean Arterial Pressure
Time Frame: Week 11 of participation
Mean Arterial Pressure was recorded during subject visits and is recorded in mm Hg
Week 11 of participation
Mean Arterial Pressure
Time Frame: Week 12 of participation
Mean Arterial Pressure was recorded during subject visits and is recorded in mm Hg
Week 12 of participation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Interleukin-10
Time Frame: At baseline.
Interleukin-10 levels will be measured throughout subject participation. They will be recorded in pg/ml.
At baseline.
Interleukin-10
Time Frame: Week 6 of study participation
Interleukin-10 levels will be measured throughout subject participation. They will be recorded in pg/ml.
Week 6 of study participation
Interleukin-10
Time Frame: Week 12 of study participation
Interleukin-10 levels will be measured throughout subject participation. They will be recorded in pg/ml.
Week 12 of study participation
Total Sleep Time
Time Frame: At baseline
Sleep time the night before in minutes
At baseline
Total Sleep Time
Time Frame: Week 1 of participation
Sleep time the night before in minutes
Week 1 of participation
Total Sleep Time
Time Frame: Week 2 of participation
Sleep time the night before in minutes
Week 2 of participation
Total Sleep Time
Time Frame: Week 3 of participation
Sleep time the night before in minutes
Week 3 of participation
Total Sleep Time
Time Frame: Week 4 of participation
Sleep time the night before in minutes
Week 4 of participation
Total Sleep Time
Time Frame: Week 5 of participation
Sleep time the night before in minutes
Week 5 of participation
Total Sleep Time
Time Frame: Week 6 of participation
Sleep time the night before in minutes
Week 6 of participation
Total Sleep Time
Time Frame: Week 7 of participation
Sleep time the night before in minutes
Week 7 of participation
Total Sleep Time
Time Frame: Week 8 of participation
Sleep time the night before in minutes
Week 8 of participation
Total Sleep Time
Time Frame: Week 9 of participation
Sleep time the night before in minutes
Week 9 of participation
Total Sleep Time
Time Frame: Week 10 of participation
Sleep time the night before in minutes
Week 10 of participation
Total Sleep Time
Time Frame: Week 11 of participation
Sleep time the night before in minutes
Week 11 of participation
Total Sleep Time
Time Frame: Week 12 of participation
Sleep time the night before in minutes
Week 12 of participation
Hamilton Depression Scale Score
Time Frame: At baseline
Score on the Hamilton Depression Inventory. Higher scores indicate greater depression symptoms. Minimum = 0, Maximum =56.
At baseline
Hamilton Depression Scale Score
Time Frame: Week 1 of Participation
Score on the Hamilton Depression Inventory. Higher scores indicate greater depression symptoms. Minimum = 0, Maximum =56.
Week 1 of Participation
Hamilton Depression Scale Score
Time Frame: Week 2 of Participation
Score on the Hamilton Depression Inventory. Higher scores indicate greater depression symptoms. Minimum = 0, Maximum =56.
Week 2 of Participation
Hamilton Depression Scale Score
Time Frame: Week 3 of Participation
Score on the Hamilton Depression Inventory. Higher scores indicate greater depression symptoms. Minimum = 0, Maximum =56.
Week 3 of Participation
Hamilton Depression Scale Score
Time Frame: Week 4 of Participation
Score on the Hamilton Depression Inventory. Higher scores indicate greater depression symptoms. Minimum = 0, Maximum =56.
Week 4 of Participation
Hamilton Depression Scale Score
Time Frame: Week 5 of Participation
Score on the Hamilton Depression Inventory. Higher scores indicate greater depression symptoms. Minimum = 0, Maximum =56.
Week 5 of Participation
Hamilton Depression Scale Score
Time Frame: Week 6 of Participation
Score on the Hamilton Depression Inventory. Higher scores indicate greater depression symptoms. Minimum = 0, Maximum =56.
Week 6 of Participation
Hamilton Depression Scale Score
Time Frame: Week 7 of Participation
Score on the Hamilton Depression Inventory. Higher scores indicate greater depression symptoms. Minimum = 0, Maximum =56.
Week 7 of Participation
Hamilton Depression Scale Score
Time Frame: Week 8 of Participation
Score on the Hamilton Depression Inventory. Higher scores indicate greater depression symptoms. Minimum = 0, Maximum =56.
Week 8 of Participation
Hamilton Depression Scale Score
Time Frame: Week 9 of Participation
Score on the Hamilton Depression Inventory. Higher scores indicate greater depression symptoms. Minimum = 0, Maximum =56.
Week 9 of Participation
Hamilton Depression Scale Score
Time Frame: Week 10 of Participation
Score on the Hamilton Depression Inventory. Higher scores indicate greater depression symptoms. Minimum = 0, Maximum =56.
Week 10 of Participation
Hamilton Depression Scale Score
Time Frame: Week 11 of Participation
Score on the Hamilton Depression Inventory. Higher scores indicate greater depression symptoms. Minimum = 0, Maximum =56.
Week 11 of Participation
Hamilton Depression Scale Score
Time Frame: Week 12 of Participation
Score on the Hamilton Depression Inventory. Higher scores indicate greater depression symptoms. Minimum = 0, Maximum =56.
Week 12 of Participation
Criteria for Cocaine Use Disorder Diagnosis
Time Frame: At Baseline
Number of criteria met on a Structured Clinical Interview as endorsed yes/no on a series of 11 questions on a scale. Range = 0-11. Higher scores indicate greater severity of Cocaine Use Disorder (e.g., more life problems due to cocaine use).
At Baseline
Criteria for Cocaine Use Disorder Diagnosis
Time Frame: Week 12 of Participation
Number of criteria met on a Structured Clinical Interview as endorsed yes/no on a series of 11 questions on a scale. Range = 0-11. Higher scores indicate greater severity of Cocaine Use Disorder (e.g., more life problems due to cocaine use).
Week 12 of Participation
Reactive Hyperemia Index
Time Frame: At Baseline
Measure of peripheral arterial tonomotry which assesses peripheral microvascular function through changes in amplitude of pulses in fingertips. Reactive hyperemia index (RHI) is "determined by calculating the ratio of hyperemic pressure (RHm) to baseline pressure (BLm) in the measurement and control arms (RHc and BLc respectively)" (Rosenberry and Nelson, 2020). This yields a natural log RHI ratio with higher scores indicating worse microvascular function. Being calculated as a natural log, there range is infinite.
At Baseline
Reactive Hyperemia Index
Time Frame: Week 12 of participation
Measure of peripheral arterial tonomotry which assesses peripheral microvascular function through changes in amplitude of pulses in fingertips. Reactive hyperemia index (RHI) is "determined by calculating the ratio of hyperemic pressure (RHm) to baseline pressure (BLm) in the measurement and control arms (RHc and BLc respectively)" (Rosenberry and Nelson, 2020). This yields a natural log RHI ratio with higher scores indicating worse microvascular function. This yields a natural log RHI ratio with higher scores indicating worse microvascular function. Being calculated as a natural log, there range is infinite.
Week 12 of participation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: William W Stoops, Ph.D., University Of Kentucky

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 15, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 15, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

January 15, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 18, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 19, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

July 21, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 1, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 31, 2024

Last Verified

July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Randomized Clinical Trial (04)
  • R01DA043938 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

A formal plan for sharing final research data is not required for investigator-initiated applications with direct costs of less than $500,000. However, we felt it important to verify that the results (i.e., summary statistics and graphical/tabular representation of the data) from this study will be presented at local, regional, national and/or international conferences. In addition, a manuscript or manuscripts describing the results will be prepared for submission to a peer-reviewed journal or journals, and the final, accepted version(s) of the manuscript(s) will be submitted to PubMed Central. As requested, the final research data will be made available to oversight or regulatory committees. The rights and privacy of individuals who participated will be protected at all times, and at no time will identifiers be included that would permit linkages to the individual subjects and variables that could lead to deductive disclosure of the identity of subjects.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cocaine Use Disorder

Clinical Trials on Contingency Management

Subscribe