Narrative Exposure Based Intervention For Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder

December 11, 2019 updated by: Michael J. Telch, University of Texas at Austin

Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is a debilitating mental disorder that affects approximately 7% of the general population. This project's aim is to develop a greater understanding of the efficacy and underlying mechanisms of narrative exposure based treatments for PTSD. Adult participants (N=162) who meet DSM-5 criteria for PTSD will be enrolled in a 3-arm randomized clinical trial consisting of trauma-related expressive writing, trauma-related expressive speaking, or a factual expressive writing control condition. Treatments will be manualized and conducted entirely through the Qualtrics survey platform. Treatment will consist of six sessions, three per week over two weeks, taking place via the internet. Assessments will be conducted pre-treatment, post-treatment, and at 1-month follow-up in the lab. Assessments will be comprised of symptom self-report measures as well as two tasks completed in an eye tracker: a reading task to evaluate mechanisms underlying trauma narrative processing and a sentence production task to evaluate attentional shifts when producing verbal information

Specific Aims and Hypotheses:

  1. Develop and test the relative efficacy of two cost-effective internet-based expressive trauma therapies (written vs. spoken) relative to a non-trauma writing control for PTSD. We hypothesize that both trauma-focused expressive therapies will achieve more favorable outcomes at posttreatment and follow-up on measures of PTSD and depression symptoms, posttraumatic growth, and quality of life compared to the writing control.
  2. Conduct exploratory analyses testing baseline PTSD severity, depression severity, trauma type, time since trauma, and emotional engagement in moderating the differential effects of the selected expressive therapies.
  3. Test the moderation of (1) active language processing with eye tracking (i.e. how long certain words are fixated on). (2) selected linguistic elements (i.e., frequency of emotional words, frequency of the pronoun "I"), (3) perceived self-efficacy to cope with trauma memories; (4) perceived threat appraisals associated with intrusive trauma memories on treatment outcome at follow-up. We hypothesize that (1) fewer and shorter fixations on ideographic (i.e. personally relevant) trauma words when reading the trauma narrative in the eye tracker will be associated with reductions in PTSD symptoms at follow-up. (2) increased use of emotional words over the course of writing sessions will be associated with reductions in PTSD and depression symptoms at follow-up; (3) pre- to posttreatment increases in trauma memory acceptance self-efficacy; and (4) pre- to posttreatment reductions in trauma memory threat appraisals will be associated with greater symptom reduction at the follow-up assessment.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

162

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78712
        • Recruiting
        • Laboratory for the Study of Anxiety Disorders
        • Contact:
          • Mikael Rubin, MA

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Males or females between the ages of 18 and 65
  2. Meets Diagnostic and Statistical Manual 5 criteria for PTSD
  3. Able to give consent
  4. Access to a computer in a private place
  5. Completes initial writing samples online

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Impaired vision
  2. Bipolar Disorder
  3. Psychosis
  4. Suicidality
  5. Current trauma related treatment
  6. Psychotropic medication <2 months or not stable (dosage variable) in past 2 months
  7. Reading grade level > 6th grade level
  8. Obsessive Compulsive Disorder
  9. Traumatic Brain Injury

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Trauma Related Expressive Writing
Participants randomized to this condition will complete six sessions during which they will write about their trauma for 20 minutes. The participant will receive instructions to write about the traumatic event that they feel affects them the most. For each session they will be instructed to write about the same event. For the first session, participants will complete psychoeducation and treatment rationale modules. The instructions for writing about the traumatic event will emphasize the importance of exploring their deepest emotions and thoughts at the time of the event, as well as providing detailed information about the event itself. For the remaining five writing sessions participants will be instructed to write about the same event and to focus on providing a detailed description of the part of the event that was most distressing to them, as well as how the event had affected their lives. A researcher will review the writing independently to ensure treatment compliance.
Participants will write about the traumatic event over the course of six sessions.
Sham Comparator: Neutral Expressive Writing
Participants randomized to this condition will complete six sessions during which they will write about their day, without describing emotions or opinions. Previous research has shown a significant reduction of symptoms with this type of control writing condition in participants with PTSD (Sloan et al., 2011). A researcher will review the writing to ensure compliance.
Participants will write about a neutral event over the course of six sessions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in PTSD symptom severity
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (baseline), Post-treatment (2-weeks), Follow-up (1 month, 3 months, 6 months)
PTSD Symptom Checklist at each assessment
Pre-treatment (baseline), Post-treatment (2-weeks), Follow-up (1 month, 3 months, 6 months)
Change in Depression symptoms
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (baseline), Post-treatment (2-weeks), Follow-up (1 month)
Becks Depression Inventory at each assessment
Pre-treatment (baseline), Post-treatment (2-weeks), Follow-up (1 month)
Change in Posttraumatic Growth
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (baseline), Post-treatment (2-weeks), Follow-up (1 month)
Post Traumatic Growth Inventory at each assessment
Pre-treatment (baseline), Post-treatment (2-weeks), Follow-up (1 month)
Change in Reading Task indices
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (baseline), Post-treatment (2-weeks), Follow-up (1 month)
Reading narratives in an eye tracker at each assessment
Pre-treatment (baseline), Post-treatment (2-weeks), Follow-up (1 month)
Change in Sentence Production Task indices
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (baseline), Post-treatment (2-weeks), Follow-up (1 month)
Describing images in an eye tracker at each assessment
Pre-treatment (baseline), Post-treatment (2-weeks), Follow-up (1 month)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael Telch, Phd, University of Texas at Austin
  • Study Director: Mikael Rubin, MA, University of Texas at Austin

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 19, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

July 25, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 13, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 11, 2019

Last Verified

December 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Post Traumatic Stress Disorder

Clinical Trials on Trauma Related Expressive Writing

3
Subscribe