Multiple Cardiac Sensors for the Management of Heart Failure (MANAGE-HF)

February 29, 2024 updated by: Boston Scientific Corporation
The MANAGE-HF study is a multi-center, global, prospective, open label, multi-phase trial intended to evaluate the clinical efficacy of the HeartLogic heart failure diagnostic feature.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Phase I of the MANAGE-HF trial is not randomized, and is intended to evaluate the clinical integration of HeartLogic for managing patients with heart failure. There are no endpoints.

Phase II of the MANAGE-HF trial will assess the clinical effectiveness of remote monitoring of heart failure patients with implanted CRT-D or ICD cardiac devices that contain the diagnostic feature HeartLogic. This feature uses S1 and S3 heart sounds, night time heart rate, thoracic impedance, and respiration to alert clinicians when a patient's heart failure is worsening. The MANAGE-HF study will compare remote monitoring using HeartLogic alerts to drive heart failure care against patients with remote monitoring but without HeartLogic alerts.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Nantes, France, 44277
        • L'Hôpital Privé du Confluent
      • Rennes, France, 35033
        • CHU Pontchaillou
      • Würzburg, Germany, 97080
        • Universitätsklinikum Würzburg AÖR
    • Alabama
      • Huntsville, Alabama, United States, 35801
        • Heart Center Research, LLC
    • Arkansas
      • Jonesboro, Arkansas, United States, 72401
        • Cardiology Associates of Northeast Arkansas
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90033
        • University of Southern California Hospital
      • Oakland, California, United States, 94609
        • Cardiovascular Consultants
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92123
        • Sharp Memorial Hospital
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94143
        • University of California, San Francisco
    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • University of Colorado
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
        • Emory University Hospital
    • Indiana
      • Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States, 46805
        • Parkview Hospital, Inc.
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46250
        • Community Health Network
    • Louisiana
      • Shreveport, Louisiana, United States, 71105
        • Advanced Cardiovascular Specialists
    • Minnesota
      • Cold Spring, Minnesota, United States, 56320
        • Centra Care Heart and Vascular Center
      • Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States, 55102
        • United Heart and Vascular
    • New Hampshire
      • Manchester, New Hampshire, United States, 03102
        • Catholic Medical Center
    • New York
      • Bronx, New York, United States, 10467
        • Montefiore Medical Center
      • Rochester, New York, United States, 14642
        • Strong Memorial Hospital of the University of Rochester
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27705
        • Duke University Medical Center
      • Raleigh, North Carolina, United States, 27607
        • Rex Hospital
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45220
        • Bethesda North Hospital
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45219
        • Lindner Center for Research and Education at Christ Hosp
    • Oregon
      • Springfield, Oregon, United States, 97477
        • PeaceHealth Sacred Heart Medical Center
    • Pennsylvania
      • Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States, 17033
        • Penn State Milton S Hershey Medical Center
      • Yardley, Pennsylvania, United States, 19067
        • Cardiology Consultants of Philadelphia
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
        • Medical University of South Carolina
    • Tennessee
      • Germantown, Tennessee, United States, 38138
        • Stern Cardiovascular
    • Texas
      • Beaumont, Texas, United States, 77702
        • Southeast Texas Clinical Research Center
    • Virginia
      • Norfolk, Virginia, United States, 23507
        • Sentara Norfolk General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject is age 18 or above, or of legal age to give informed consent
  2. Implanted with an cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) device that has HeartLogic
  3. Current symptomatic heart failure or New York Heart Association Class II or III at the time of enrollment
  4. Remotely monitored by LATITUDE 5.0 (or future versions)
  5. Willing and capable of participating in all study visits and complying with medication/treatment requirements associated with this clinical study at an approved clinical study center.
  6. Meet at least one of the three following conditions:

    • At least one documented hospitalization with a primary diagnosis of worsening for heart failure during the 12 months prior to enrollment; or
    • Unscheduled outpatient visit with IV diuretic therapy for acute worsening of HF during 90 days prior to enrollment; or
    • N-terminal-pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) greater than 600 pg/mL or brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) greater than 150 pg/mL at any time during 90 days prior to enrollment

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. The subject is unable to sign or refuses to sign the patient informed consent
  2. Symptomatic heart failure at rest or New York Heart Association Class IV at the time of enrollment
  3. The subject is implanted with unipolar right atrial or right ventricular leads
  4. Subject has received or is scheduled to receive a heart transplant or ventricular assist device within the next 6 months
  5. Subject is pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the study
  6. Subject is enrolled in any other concurrent study (without prior written approval from Boston Scientific, excluding registries)
  7. Glomerular filtration rate <25 mL/min who are non-responsive to diuretic therapy or are on chronic renal dialysis
  8. Regularly scheduled intravenous heart failure therapy (for example inotropes or diuretics)
  9. A life expectancy of less than 12 months per clinician discretion
  10. APPLICABLE TO PHASE II ONLY: Subject enrolled in Phase I of MANAGE-HF
  11. APPLICABLE TO PHASE II ONLY: Subject has been managed with HeartLogic Alerts ON at anytime within the past 6 months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: HeartLogic ON
ICD and CRT-D devices with HeartLogic alerts turned ON
Remote management of patients with CRT-D or ICD devices and the HeartLogic diagnostic feature turned OFF
Placebo Comparator: HeartLogic OFF
ICD and CRT-D devices with HeartLogic alerts turned OFF
Remote management of patients with CRT-D or ICD devices and the HeartLogic diagnostic feature turned ON

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Manage-HF Phase I
Time Frame: Data was collected from the time of consent until the last Phase I subject had completed their 12-month visit
Phase-I was a single arm non-randomized study used to evaluate and optimize HeartLogic clinical integration and alert management. Phase-I had no outcome measures.
Data was collected from the time of consent until the last Phase I subject had completed their 12-month visit

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Freedom from all-cause mortality
Time Frame: Subjects that have survived the entire follow-up will be censored at their date of withdrawal, study exit or on the date of the data snapshot, whichever occurs first.
This endpoint will compare the Kaplan-Meier curves of all-cause survival between the HeartLogic and control groups.
Subjects that have survived the entire follow-up will be censored at their date of withdrawal, study exit or on the date of the data snapshot, whichever occurs first.
Freedom from heart failure hospitalizations (time-to-first event)
Time Frame: Subjects that have survived without experiencing a heart failure hospitalization at the time of analysis will be censored at their date of withdrawal, study exit or on the date of the data snapshot, whichever occurs first
This endpoint will compare the Kaplan-Meier curves of freedom from heart failure hospitalizations between the HeartLogic and control groups
Subjects that have survived without experiencing a heart failure hospitalization at the time of analysis will be censored at their date of withdrawal, study exit or on the date of the data snapshot, whichever occurs first
Risk of multiple heart failure hospitalizations
Time Frame: All heart failure hospitalizations following randomization for each subject in Phase II will contribute to the analysis
This endpoint will compare the cause-specific hazard of heart failure hospitalizations between the HeartLogic and control groups.
All heart failure hospitalizations following randomization for each subject in Phase II will contribute to the analysis
Change in NYHA classification
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months.
Change in NYHA from baseline through 12 months will be evaluated and compared between the randomized groups.
Baseline and 12 months.
Change in Quality of Life
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months.
Change in Quality of Life from baseline through 12 months will be evaluated and compared between the randomized groups .
Baseline and 12 months.
Change in NT-proBNP
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months.
Change in NT-proBNP from baseline through 12 months will be evaluated and compared between the randomized groups.
Baseline and 12 months.
Change in Medication Status
Time Frame: From each patients randomization through final endpoint accrual.
Change in medication status throughout the study will be evaluated and compared between the randomized groups.
From each patients randomization through final endpoint accrual.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Adrian Hernandez, MD, Duke University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 30, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 21, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

July 21, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 20, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 31, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

August 3, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 27, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 29, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 92125179

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure, Congestive

Clinical Trials on HeartLogic ON

Subscribe