Non-Interventional Study (NIS) Collecting Experiences For IPF in Taiwan

March 19, 2021 updated by: Boehringer Ingelheim
This is a non-interventional, multi-center study to collect data from patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) in clinical practice in Taiwan. The study will be carried out at 10 medical centers, the expert centers where IPF patients are mainly managed in Taiwan.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

101

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Changhua, Taiwan, 500
        • Chang-Hua Christian Hospital
      • Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 807
        • Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital
      • Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 83301
        • Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
      • New Taipei, Taiwan, 220
        • Far Eastern Memorial Hospital
      • Taichung, Taiwan, 404
        • China Medical University Hospital
      • Taichung, Taiwan, 40705
        • Taichung Veterans General Hospital
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 11217
        • Taipei Veterans General Hospital
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 114
        • Tri-Service General Hospital
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 10048
        • National Taiwan University Hospital
      • Tao-Yuan, Taiwan, 333
        • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital(Linkou)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The study will be carried out at 10 medical centers, the expert centers where idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) patients are mainly managed in Taiwan.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients can be included if ALL the following criteria are met:

    1.Newly diagnosed with IPF within 6 months based upon recent ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT IPF guideline (Ref 1, Raghu G, et al. 2011).

  • Exclusion of other known causes of ILD (e.g. domestic and occupational environmental exposures, connective tissue disease, and drug toxicity).
  • Assessment of IPF based on HRCT or HRCT and surgical lung biopsy, if available. 2.Patient ≥ 20 years of age 3.Written informed consent prior to participation 4.Patients with further follow-up possible with participating physician during planned study period 5.Ability to read and write in the local language

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients should not be included if ANY of the following criteria is met:

    1. Lung transplantation expected within next 6 months.
    2. Inclusion in ongoing clinical trials.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF)
Drug
Other Names:
  • OVEF
Drug

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Annual Change From Baseline in Percentage of Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Week 52
Time Frame: At baseline and Week 52.
Annual Change from Baseline in percentage of predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Week 52 was reported.
At baseline and Week 52.
Annual Change From Baseline in Percentage of Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Week 100
Time Frame: At baseline and Week 100.
Annual Change from Baseline in percentage of predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Week 100 was reported.
At baseline and Week 100.
Annual Change From Baseline in Percentage of Predicted Diffusing Capacity of the Lungs for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Week 52
Time Frame: At baseline and Week 52.
Annual Change from Baseline in percentage of predicted Diffusing capacity of the Lungs for Carbon monoxide (DLco) at Week 52 was reported
At baseline and Week 52.
Annual Change From Baseline in Percentage of Predicted Diffusing Capacity of the Lungs for Carbon Monoxide (DLco) at Week 100
Time Frame: At baseline and Week 100.
Annual Change from Baseline in percentage of predicted Diffusing capacity of the Lungs for Carbon monoxide (DLco) at Week 100 was reported.
At baseline and Week 100.
Annual Change From Baseline in Percentage of Predicted Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) at Week 52
Time Frame: At baseline and Week 52.
Annual Change from Baseline in percentage of predicted oxygen saturation (SpO2) at Week 52 was reported.
At baseline and Week 52.
Annual Change From Baseline in Percentage of Predicted Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) at Week 100
Time Frame: At baseline and Week 100.
Annual Change from Baseline in percentage of predicted oxygen saturation (SpO2) at Week 100 was reported.
At baseline and Week 100.
Annual Change From Baseline in Percentage of Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Week 52
Time Frame: At baseline and Week 52.
Annual Change from Baseline in percentage of predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Week 52was reported.
At baseline and Week 52.
Annual Change From Baseline in Percentage of Predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Week 100
Time Frame: At baseline and Week 100.
Annual Change from Baseline in percentage of predicted Total Lung Capacity (TLC) at Week 100 was reported.
At baseline and Week 100.
Annual Change From Baseline in Percentage of Predicted Inspiratory Capacity (IC) at Week 52
Time Frame: At baseline and Week 52.
Annual Change from Baseline in percentage of predicted Inspiratory Capacity (IC) at Week 52 was reported.
At baseline and Week 52.
Annual Change From Baseline in Percentage of Predicted Inspiratory Capacity (IC) at Week 100
Time Frame: At baseline and Week 100.
Annual Change from Baseline in percentage of predicted Inspiratory Capacity (IC) at Week 100 was reported.
At baseline and Week 100.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to First Acute Exacerbation of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Time Frame: From baseline until end of follow-up, up to 899 days.
Time to first acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis was reported.
From baseline until end of follow-up, up to 899 days.
Annual Change in Total Score of St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) at Week 52
Time Frame: At baseline and Week 52.
The SGRQ is a 50-item questionnaire developed to measure health status (quality of life) in patients with diseases of airways obstruction. The questionnaire included 3 subscales measures: symptoms, activity limitation, and social, and emotional impact of disease (each subscale score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher score indicating poorer quality of life). The SGRQ total score was calculated by summing weights from all positive items, divided by sum of weights for all items in SGRQ questionnaire and multiplying by 100. The total score of SGRQ ranged from 0 (no effect on quality of life) to 100 (maximum perceived distress). Thus, a higher score indicated a poorer quality of life. Annual change in score of St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) at Week 52 was reported.
At baseline and Week 52.
Annual Change in Total Score of St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) at Week 100
Time Frame: At baseline and Week 100.
The SGRQ is a 50-item questionnaire developed to measure health status (quality of life) in patients with diseases of airways obstruction. The questionnaire included 3 subscales measures: symptoms, activity limitation, and social, and emotional impact of disease (each subscale score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher score indicating poorer quality of life). The SGRQ total score was calculated by summing weights from all positive items, divided by sum of weights for all items in SGRQ questionnaire and multiplying by 100. The total score of SGRQ ranged from 0 (no effect on quality of life) to 100 (maximum perceived distress). Thus, a higher score indicated a poorer quality of life. Annual change in score of St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) at Week 100 was reported.
At baseline and Week 100.
Annual Change in Score of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test (CAT) at Week 52
Time Frame: At baseline and Week 52
The Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Assessment Test (CAT) is an 8-item, health status instrument which provides a method for assessing the impact of COPD on the patient's health and quality of life. The CAT score (ranging from 0 to 40) was calculated for each individual by summing the points for each item. A decrease in CAT score represents an improvement in health status, whereas an increase in CAT score represents a worsening in health status.
At baseline and Week 52
Annual Change in Score of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test (CAT) at Week 100
Time Frame: At baseline and Week 100
The Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Assessment Test (CAT) is an 8-item, health status instrument which provides a method for assessing the impact of COPD on the patient's health and quality of life. The CAT score (ranging from 0 to 40) was calculated for each individual by summing the points for each item. A decrease in CAT score represents an improvement in health status, whereas an increase in CAT score represents a worsening in health status.
At baseline and Week 100
Annual Change in Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) at Week 52
Time Frame: At baseline and Week 52.
Annual change in Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) at Week 52 was reported. The 6MWT measured the distance that a person can walk in 6 minutes, providing information regarding functional capacity, response to therapy and prognosis.
At baseline and Week 52.
Annual Change in Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) at Week 100
Time Frame: At baseline and Week 100.
Annual change in Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) at Week 100 was reported. The 6MWT measured the distance that a person can walk in 6 minutes, providing information regarding functional capacity, response to therapy and prognosis.
At baseline and Week 100.
Overall Survival
Time Frame: From baseline until end of follow-up, up to 899 days.
Overall survival was reported. Overall survival was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause.
From baseline until end of follow-up, up to 899 days.
Number of Participants Per Death Reason Categories
Time Frame: From baseline until end of follow-up, up to 899 days.
Number of participants per death reason categories was reported.
From baseline until end of follow-up, up to 899 days.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 17, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 18, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

February 18, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 3, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 7, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

August 8, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 13, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pulmonary Fibrosis

Clinical Trials on nintedanib

3
Subscribe