Occipito-Cervical Stabilization Using Occipital Condyle Screw

August 12, 2017 updated by: Muhammad Almessry, Assiut University

Occipito-Cervical Stabilization Using Occipital Condyle as a Cranial Anchor

The Occipito-Cervical (OC) junction is the most cephalad portion of the spinal axis, with anatomical osseous complex that allows significant mobility while maintaining biomechanical stability. OC instability is a rare disorder with potentially life-threatening consequences. Instability may manifest as disabling pain, cranial nerve dysfunction, paralysis, or even sudden death. The most common acute presentation is secondary to major trauma. Other pathologic processes that may lead to chronic instability include rheumatoid arthritis, infections, tumors, and even congenital malformations; OC fusion in aforementioned cases each according is then indicated.

Stabilization of the OC junction remains a challenge, owing to the regional anatomy and poor occipital bone purchase. OC stabilization techniques have undergone continuous refinement. Early techniques involving simple posterior only bone grafts demonstrated a high rate of failure and have largely been replaced by rigid posterior fixation systems using rods/screws or plates, providing superior biomechanical stability and higher rates of fusion. One of the very modern modalities of fixation methods is the Occipital Condyle Screw (OCS) as a sole cranial anchor; believing that decreasing the length of lever arm of the construct, increasing the length of the screw purchase, and decreasing stresses addressed on the rod with no need to excessively bend it for the occipital slope may enhance the construct rigidity, and leaving a greater clear metal-free area of the occiput for graft contact may have a real potential benefits in fusion rates.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Clinical Evaluation: of patients with 1- Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), 2- Neck Disability Index (NDI), 3- Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Score (mJOA.CMS), 4- American Spinal Injury Association Score (ASIAs). Immediate preoperative functional scoring, and 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year postoperative.

Surgical Technique: The patient is handled in prone position after successful general anaesthesia with supported head to ensure that the Occipito-Cervical junction maintains in neutral position. The Occipito-Cervical junction is then exposed through a traditional midline longitudinal posterior skin incision extends from the external occipital protuberance to the C3-C4 level. The nuchal ligament is divided in the midline, and the occipital and cervical musculature is dissected subperiosteally. The suboccipital and cervical paraspinous muscles are retracted laterally to expose the underlying bony architecture. The posterior arch of C1 is exposed and the dissection is continued laterally in a subperiosteal manner to identify the horizontal segment of the vertebral arteries (VAs) which is enveloped in a dense venous plexus. The atlanto-occipital joint capsule is to be approx. 3 mm. Cranial to the superior margin of tht VA. Attention is then focused on the foramen magnum. Using curettes, the atlanto-occipital membrane is gently dissected from the foramen magnum laterally until the medial aspect of the occipital condyle is reached. At this point, the dissection continues laterally, maintaining bone contact to prevent injury to the horizontal segment of the VA along the condylar fossa, until the posterior condylar foramen and emissary vein are identified. The condylar foramen and vein represent the lateral extent of the dissection. At this stage, the operative field is prepared for instrumentation. Inserting the cervical screws first provides useful information about the axial location of the occipital condyles. The condylar entry point (CEP) is defined using a combination of radiographic and anatomic landmarks. The CEP is located (4 to 5 mm) lateral to the posteromedial edge of the condyle, and (2 mm) above the atlanto-occipital joint line. Pilot hole is then made at the entry point using an awl with slight cranial angulation to avoid injury to the horizontal segment of the VA. The pilot hole is then drilled under image-guidance in a convergent trajectory with (12 to 22 degrees) of medial angulation and (5 degrees) cranial angulation in the sagittal plane with the tip of the drill directed toward the basion, advancing slowly until the anterior cortical edge of the condyle is breached. The hole is tapped, and a (3.5 mm) polyaxial screw of an appropriate length (30 to 34 mm) is inserted bicortically into the occipital condyle. Approximately (12 mm) portion of the screw remains superficial to the posterior cortex of the condyle, allowing the polyaxial portion of the screw to lie above the posterior arch of C1, minimizing any chance of irritation of the VA by the rods.

Radiological Evaluation: 1- Preoperative: Plain X-ray (PXR) Antero-posterior (AP) and Lateral (Lat.) views to study the upper cervical instability indices and measurements, Multi-Slice Computed Tomography (MSCT) to study the boney Occipito-Cervical architecture for any fractures or anomalies, CT Angiography (CTA) to study the vertebral artery for anomaly especially in the horizontal segment of the VA, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) to study the spinal cord for any compression signs. 2- Postoperative: Immediate (PXR) AP. and Lat. views for overall global assessment of the reduction and the construct installation. Then at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery with flexion extension lateral view bending stress films for assessment of stability. Immediate (MSCT) to study the crucial screws placement estate for any breaches or successfulness, and after 1year for assessment of the fusion rate achieved.

Serial Follow-Up: after 6 weeks for clinical evaluation and functional scoring. At 3 and 6 months for radiological evaluation of stability, clinical evaluation and functional re-scoring. At 1 year for evaluation of fusion rate, clinical evaluation and over all resultant functional scores.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with occipito-cervical instability of any cause, indicated for occipito-cervical fusion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Fractured occipital condyle
  • Congenital malformation of occipital condyle
  • Congenital anomaly of the horizontal segment of the vertebral artery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Occipito-Cervical Instability
Stabilization of the occipito-cervical junction by Occipital Condyle Screw (OCS) as a sole cranial anchor, with posterior bone graft.
Occipito-Cervical Screw-Rod Fixation Technique

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
CT based classification for assessment of biological graft fusion
Time Frame: At 6 months postoperative
A new assessment method of bony union using high-speed spiral CT imaging is proposed which reflects the gradually increasing biological stability of the construct. Grade I (complete fusion) implies cortical union of the allograft and central trabecular continuity. Grade II (partial fusion) implies cortical union of the structural allograft with partial trabecular incorporation. Grade III (unipolar pseudarthrosis) denotes superior or inferior cortical non-union of the central allograft with partial trabecular discontinuity centrally and Grade IV (bipolar pseudarthrosis) suggests both superior and inferior cortical non-union with a complete lack of central trabecular continuity.
At 6 months postoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analogue Scale for Pain (VAS Pain)
Time Frame: Baseline measure, then at 2 weeks, 3 months and 6 months postoperative
Operationally a VAS is usually a horizontal line, 100 mm in length, anchored by word descriptors at each end. The patient marks on the line the point that they feel represents their perception of their current state. The VAS score is determined by measuring in millimetres from the left hand end of the line to the point that the patient marks.
Baseline measure, then at 2 weeks, 3 months and 6 months postoperative
Neck Disability Index (NDI)
Time Frame: Baseline measure, then at 2 weeks, 3 months and 6 months postoperative

Each of 10 items, which are 1. Pain intensity 2. Personal care 3. Lifting 4. Reading 5. Headaches 6. Concentration 7. Work 8. Driving 9. Sleeping 10. Recreation, is scored from 0 - 5. The maximum score is therefore 50. The obtained score can be multiplied by 2 to produce a percentage score. Occasionally, a respondent will not complete one question or another. The average of all other items is then added to the completed items.

The original report provided scoring intervals for interpretation, as follows: 0 - 4 = no disability, 5 - 14 = mild, 15 - 24 = moderate, 25 - 34 = severe, and above 34 = complete.

Baseline measure, then at 2 weeks, 3 months and 6 months postoperative
American Spinal Injury Association Score (ASIAs)
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months postoperative

A score developed by the American Spinal Injury Association for essential minimal elements of neurologic assessment for all patients with a spinal injury.

(A). Complete loss of motor and sensory function below the level of injury, including the anal saddle shaped area.

(B). Spared all/some sensory function below the level of injury, including the anal saddle shaped area.

(C). Spared all/some motor function below the level of injury, but cannot move against gravity.

(D). Spared all/some motor function below the level of injury, with ability to move against gravity.

(E). Neurologically free.

Baseline and 3 months postoperative
Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Score (mJOA.CSM)
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months postoperative

Motor dysfunction Upper extremities

0. Doesn't move hands

  1. Doesn't eat with a spoon, moves hands
  2. Doesn't button shirt, eats with a spoon
  3. Buttons shirt with great difficulty
  4. Buttons shirt with slight difficulty
  5. No dysfunction

Motor dysfunction Lower extremities

0. Complete loss motor & sensory

  1. Sensory preservation, doesn't move legs
  2. Moves legs, doesn't walk
  3. Walks on flat floor with walking aid
  4. Walks up or downstairs w/aid of a handrail
  5. Moderate-to-significant lack of stability, walks up or downstairs without handrail
  6. Mild lack of stability, walks unaided with smooth reciprocation
  7. No dysfunction

Sensory dysfunction Upper extremities

0. Complete loss of hand sensation

  1. Severe sensory loss or pain
  2. Mild sensory loss
  3. No sensory loss

Sphincter dysfunction

0. Unable to micturate voluntarily

  1. Marked difficulty in micturition
  2. Mild-to-moderate difficulty in micturition
  3. Normal micturition
Baseline and 3 months postoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Mohamed El-Meshtawy, MD, Assiut University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

September 1, 2017

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

June 1, 2019

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

January 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 10, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 12, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

August 15, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 15, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 12, 2017

Last Verified

August 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • OC.Screw

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cervical Instabilities Spine

Clinical Trials on Occipital Condyle Screw

3
Subscribe