Peer Learning and HBB in Managing Maternal Newborn and Child Health Emergencies in Rural Uganda (SimForLife)

Use of Simulation Based Education With Peer Learning to Enhance HBB Training for Managing Maternal Newborn and Child Health Emergencies in Rural Uganda: A Cluster-randomized Trial

The aim of this study is to test an intervention that has potential to improve acute care skills and confidence related to safe delivery and newborn care for mid-level health providers in Uganda by the development of a 'mobile' simulation package including scale-up materials based upon research evidence. In this randomized study investigators will compare the impact of a peer learning package on skills, knowledge and team work regarding newborn care among health workers in rural south western Uganda.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The aim of this study is to test an intervention that has potential to improve acute care skills and confidence related to safe delivery and newborn care for mid-level health providers in Uganda by the development of a 'mobile' simulation package including scale-up materials based upon research evidence. In this randomized study investigators will compare the impact of a peer learning package on skills, knowledge and team work regarding newborn care among health workers in rural south western Uganda.

The cluster randomized study will have two arms; intervention arm receives peer learning program. In this program, two health workers at the same health facility teach each other using case scenarios. The case scenarios will be based on common neonatal conditions such as neonatal sepsis, hypothermia and prematurity.

The two study arms will both receive training on HBB and Essential care for every baby (ECEB)

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

77

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Health workers involved in performing deliveries of mothers at health center IVs and IIIs (i.e, county and subcounty level)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Health facilities based in municipalities, urban dwellings

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
Standard HBB and ECEB training with peer learning
Peer learning plus HBB and ECEB
No Intervention: Control
Standard HBB and ECEB training only

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Skills on key maternal, newborn and child health emergency procedures
Time Frame: Change in skills scores at 6 and 12 months from Baseline
Ability to perform key maternal, new born and child health emergency procedures measured using Multiple choice questions (MCQs). A composite score with a maximum of 100% will be computed from these MCQs
Change in skills scores at 6 and 12 months from Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical teamwork scores
Time Frame: Change in CTS scores at 6 and 12 months from Baseline
Ability to work as a team through communication, sharing roles and completing tasks together measured using the Clinical Teamwork scale (CTS). A composite score will be computed by adding up all the items on the CTS scale. CTS has 15 items, each item with a maximum score of 10
Change in CTS scores at 6 and 12 months from Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

August 30, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 9, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 14, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

August 17, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 17, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 14, 2017

Last Verified

August 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MUST 21/06-16

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Authorization to share data will be sought

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Emergencies

Clinical Trials on Peer learning

3
Subscribe