Efficacy of Physiotherapy for Urinary Incontinence in Women With a Puborectalis Avulsion

June 12, 2023 updated by: Mélanie Morin, Université de Sherbrooke

Efficacy of Physiotherapy for Urinary Incontinence in Women With a Known Avulsion Injury of the Puborectalis Muscle: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Childbirth is a major risk factor for pelvic floor muscle (PFM) trauma. In one third of women, stretching of the PFM will result in an avulsion injury (i.e. disconnection of the muscle from its insertion points on the pubic symphysis). Recent advances in imaging have led to the discovery of this previously unknown major injury and further research now enables its diagnosis with readily available techniques. Avulsion injury has alarming consequences because it has been associated with a higher rate of urinary incontinence in the postpartum period as well as the long-term development of other major urogynecological conditions such as pelvic organ prolapse and anal incontinence. Women with avulsion not only suffer from severe symptoms with significant related impacts on physical activities, overall well-being and quality of life, but they also present a higher rate of surgical failures. Moreover, it is still unknown whether the most recommended first-line treatment for urinary incontinence -PFM physiotherapy- is effective in women with this major trauma. Until now, only a pilot study conducted by our team supports the rationale and the efficacy of physiotherapy for improving PFM function in women with avulsion, despite their major muscle injury.

Primary objective: To evaluate the efficacy of physiotherapy for urinary incontinence in women with avulsion at 9-months after randomization compared to a waiting-list control group.

Secondary objectives:

  1. To compare physiotherapy to the control group after treatment and at 9-months after randomization in terms of: a) incontinence and prolapse (objective quantification, symptoms and related impact); b) PFM morphology and function; c) sexual function; d) self-efficacy; e) cost analysis; f) treatment satisfaction and impression of change.
  2. To investigate the impact of the severity of the avulsion (i.e. unilateral or bilateral) on the response to physiotherapy treatment on the aforementioned outcomes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a multicenter randomized controlled trial using a parallel group design that involves women with a confirmed diagnosis of avulsion and suffering from urinary incontinence. Participants will be randomized into either physiotherapy or a waiting-list control group. Both groups will be evaluated at baseline, post-treatment (3 months post-randomization) and 9 months after randomization. Women in the control group will receive full-body relaxation massage which has shown no effect on continence but was selected to control for effects of attention received by the therapist. After the 9-month assessment, women assigned to the control group will receive the same physiotherapy treatment and undergo a last assessment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

126

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada, J1H 5N4
        • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18-45 years old
  • Postpartum women (≥ 1 vaginal delivery at term (≥ 37 weeks) and ≥ 3 months postpartum
  • ≥ 3 urinary incontinence episodes per week over the last 3 months (Symptoms of incontinence must be associated predominantly or solely with stress urinary incontinence (as opposed to urge incontinence) which will be determined with a recommended and validated diagnosis questionnaire (Questionnaire for Urinary Incontinence Diagnosis))
  • Women with diagnosis avulsion injury

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy or postmenopausal
  • Previous pelvic irradiation, urogynecological surgery, or PFM physiotherapy after the avulsion occurred
  • Significant prolapse (≥3 degree)
  • Incontinence due to other causes such as infection, neurological diseases, voiding difficulties
  • Any other acute or chronic medical problems likely to interfere with treatment or evaluation such as cancer, chronic constipation (Rome III criteria), obesity (body mass index >35), pacemaker, bladder stimulator
  • Medication or ongoing treatment likely to interfere with incontinence

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Multimodal physiotherapy
12 weeks of weekly multimodal physiotherapy treatments
12 weeks of weekly physiotherapy treatments including education segment, electrical stimulation and PFM exercises consisting of strength, endurance and coordination exercises accompanied by biofeedback
No Intervention: Waiting-list control group
12 weeks of weekly full-body relaxation massage

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent reduction in the number of urinary incontinence episodes
Time Frame: baseline, post-treatment (3 months post-randomization) and 9 months after randomization
The 7-day bladder diary was selected as the primary outcome to measure urinary leakage reduction
baseline, post-treatment (3 months post-randomization) and 9 months after randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in symptoms and impact of incontinence and other urogynecological conditions
Time Frame: baseline, post-treatment (3 months post-randomization) and 9 months after randomization
Evaluated with ICI Modular Questionnaires (ICIQ), Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI), Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-SF) and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom score (POP-SS)
baseline, post-treatment (3 months post-randomization) and 9 months after randomization
Change in pelvic floor muscle morphometry and function
Time Frame: baseline, post-treatment (3 months post-randomization) and 9 months after randomization
Evaluated with transperineal ultrasound and dynamometry
baseline, post-treatment (3 months post-randomization) and 9 months after randomization
Change in severity of prolapse
Time Frame: baseline, post-treatment (3 months post-randomization) and 9 months after randomization
Evaluated with POP-Q assessment
baseline, post-treatment (3 months post-randomization) and 9 months after randomization
Change in sexual function
Time Frame: baseline, post-treatment (3 months post-randomization) and 9 months after randomization
Evaluated with Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-SF)
baseline, post-treatment (3 months post-randomization) and 9 months after randomization
Change in self-efficacy
Time Frame: baseline, post-treatment (3 months post-randomization) and 9 months after randomization
Evaluated with Broom Pelvic Muscle Self-Efficacy Scale
baseline, post-treatment (3 months post-randomization) and 9 months after randomization
Cost analysis
Time Frame: baseline and 9 months after randomization
Evaluated with Dowell-Bryant Incontinence Cost Index (DBICI)
baseline and 9 months after randomization
Treatment satisfaction and impression of change
Time Frame: baseline, post-treatment (3 months post-randomization) and 9 months after randomization
Evaluated with Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ) and Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
baseline, post-treatment (3 months post-randomization) and 9 months after randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 28, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 10, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

May 10, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 9, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 15, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

August 18, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 15, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2023

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Urinary Incontinence

Clinical Trials on Multimodal physiotherapy

3
Subscribe