Comparison of Criteria for the Designation of a Contact Person in ICU Patients and Close Friends and Relatives (REPERE II/III)

August 23, 2017 updated by: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon

ICU and Contact Person: Comparison of Criteria for Designation in Patients and Close Friends and Relatives

In the vast majority of cases, the person of trust (or contact person) is not designated by the patient (emergency, severe disease situations, coma, sedation, etc.). The healthcare team thus identifies a person who 1) may not be the person the patient would have designated and 2) may not be the most suitable to take on this responsibility. Though the first point is not easy, the main difficulty for the clinician is to know if he is dealing with the "right person for the job", meaning a person who is able to take on the responsibility of the contact person. This is a heavy responsibility in terms of the information given, of passing on this information to relatives and friends, of consulting the doctors, of help or support in medical decisions, etc. This responsibility may also be difficult for one person alone to take on and it may be helpful to share it between several friends or relatives. In a princeps study (QUENOT, 2015), it was shown that the process used by the healthcare team to designate a contact person was based on criteria such as knowledge of the wishes and values of the patient, the strength of the relationship with the patient, and the person of trust designated before admission to the ICU. However, we do not know what criteria are used by the patients themselves or those used by their close friends and relatives. This study will make it possible to determine and to measure the possible differences between the criteria used by the ICU healthcare team (REPERE I), those used by patients (REPERE III) and finally, those used by close friends and relatives (REPERE II).

In order to do this, 300 persons (150 patients and 150 relatives/friends) will complete questionnaires.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

300

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Dijon, France, 21079
        • Recruiting
        • Chu Dijon Bourgogne

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients admitted to the medical ICU of Dijon CHU Burgundy and their relatives/friends.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients and their friends/relatives who have been given information on the study
  • Patients admitted to the ICU according to the criteria defined by decree n° 2002-465 of the law of 5 April 2002 relative to the rights of patients and the quality of the healthcare system;
  • Patients unable to designate a person of trust on admission;
  • Patients able to designate a person of trust on discharge from the ICU.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal to participate;
  • Age < 18 years;
  • Patient/relative under ward of court;
  • Patient/relative presenting a major cognitive disorder ruling out a reliable interview;
  • Patient and/or relative who cannot be interviewed or who cannot provide information ;
  • Absence of family and/or close friends.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patients
Patients hospitalised in the ICU of Dijon CHU Burgundy
Proches
Relatives/close friends of patients hospitalised in the ICU of Dijon CHU Burgundy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Difference between scores measured (relatives/patients) on the scales for the principal criteria for the designation of a contact person
Time Frame: at baseline
at baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

September 1, 2017

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

September 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 23, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 23, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

August 24, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 24, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 23, 2017

Last Verified

August 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • QUENOT 2016

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Patients Hospitalised in a Medical ICU

Clinical Trials on Questionnaire

3
Subscribe