Study of Basivertebral Nerve Ablation Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain

December 21, 2020 updated by: Relievant Medsystems, Inc.

A Prospective, Open-Label, Single-Arm Study of Intraosseous Basivertebral Nerve Ablation for the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain

Prospective, single arm, open label, multi-center study to evaluated the effectiveness of intraosseous basivertebral nerve radiofrequency ablation using the Intracept System.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This is a prospective, open-label, single-arm study of patients diagnosed with vertebrogenic low back pain for a minimum of 6 months with conservative care. Participants will receive the Intracept System procedure to ablate the basivertebral nerve within the vertebral body. Treatment is performed on all vertebral bodies with Modic type 1 or type 2 changes on MRI from L3-S1.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Indiana
      • Carmel, Indiana, United States, 46032
        • Indiana Spine Group
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78731
        • Seton Spine and Scoliosis Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

25 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Skeletally mature subjects at least 25 years of age
  • Chronic low back pain for at least 6 months
  • Failure to respond to at least 6 months of non-operative conservative management
  • Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at least 30 points
  • Modic changes Type 1 or 2

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current or history of vertebral cancer or spinal metastasis
  • History of a fragility fracture
  • Any back pathology related to trauma, evidence of vertebral compression fracture or other spinal pathology that could affect assessment of response to back pain
  • Disc extrusion or protrusion

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Treatment
BVN Ablation
Radiofrequency ablation of the basivertebral nerve using the Intracept System

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) - 3 Months
Time Frame: 3 months
Change in mean Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) total score from baseline to 3 months post-treatment. ODI total score scale of 0 (no disability) to 100 (complete disability), with categories of 0-20 (minimal disability), 21-40 (moderate disability), 41-60 (severe disability), 61-80 (crippling back pain), and 81-100 (bed-bound or exaggerating). The minimally clinically important difference in ODI from baseline is considered to be a 10 points reduction from baseline.
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - 3 Months
Time Frame: 3 Months
Change in the mean visual analog scale (VAS) low back pain from baseline to 3 months post treatment. VAS is a 10 point numeric scale with 0 being no pain and 10 being worst imaginable pain. The minimal clinically important difference is a 2 point reduction from baseline.
3 Months
ODI Responder Rate - 3-Month
Time Frame: 3 Months
Number & percent of patients with greater than or equal to 15 point reduction in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) from baseline to 3 months post treatment. ODI is scored on a scale of 0 (no disability) to 100 (complete disability), with categories of 0-20 (minimal disability), 21-40 (moderate disability), 41-60 (severe disability), 61-80 (crippling back pain), and 81-100 (bed-bound or exaggerating). The minimally clinically important difference for this tool is considered to be 10 points.
3 Months
VAS Responder Rate - 3 Month
Time Frame: 3 Months
Number and percentage of participants with a greater than or equal to 2 point reduction from baseline in visual analog scale (VAS) for low back pain at 3 months post treatment. VAS is a patient-reported 10 point numeric pain scale with 0 being no pain and 10 being worst imaginable pain. The minimal clinically important difference in VAS from baseline is a 2 point reduction.
3 Months
ODI -12 Months
Time Frame: 12 Months
Change in mean Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) total score from baseline to 12 months post treatment. ODI total score is on a scale of 0 (no disability) to 100 (complete disability), with categories of 0-20 (minimal disability), 21-40 (moderate disability), 41-60 (severe disability), 61-80 (crippling back pain), and 81-100 (bed-bound or exaggerating). The minimally clinically important difference for this tool is considered to be 10 point reduction in ODI.
12 Months
VAS - 12 Month
Time Frame: 12 Months
Change in mean visual analog scale (VAS) for low back pain score from baseline at 12 months. VAS is a patient-reported 10 point numeric pain scale with 0 being no pain and 10 being worst imaginable pain. The minimal clinically important difference in VAS from baseline is a 2 point reduction.
12 Months
ODI Responder Rate - 12-Month
Time Frame: 12 Months
Number and percent of patients with greater than or equal to 15 point reduction in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) total score from baseline to 12 months post treatment. ODI total score scale of 0 (no disability) to 100 (complete disability), with categories of 0-20 (minimal disability), 21-40 (moderate disability), 41-60 (severe disability), 61-80 (crippling back pain), and 81-100 (bed-bound or exaggerating). The minimally clinically important difference for this tool is considered to be 10 points.
12 Months
VAS Responder Rate - 12 Months
Time Frame: 12 Months
Number and percent of participants with a reduction of greater than or equal to 2 points of the visual analog scale (VAS) at 12 months post treatment. VAS is a patient-reported 10 point numeric pain scale with 0 being no pain and 10 being worst imaginable pain. The minimal clinically important difference in VAS from baseline is a 2 point reduction in score.
12 Months
VAS Reduction 50% or More - 12 Month
Time Frame: 12 Months
Number and percent of participants that reported a 50% or greater reduction in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) from baseline to 12 months.
12 Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Eeric Truumees, MD, Independent
  • Principal Investigator: Kevin Macadaeg, MD, Independent

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

February 14, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

February 17, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

February 17, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 16, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 28, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

August 29, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

December 22, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2020

Last Verified

December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CIP 0007 and CIP 0008

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Results

IPD Sharing Time Frame

At the completion of trial

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Written request to study sponsor

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on Intracept

3
Subscribe