Rescue Regimen and High Dose Methotrexate in Management of Presistent Gestational Trophoplastic Neoplasia

September 11, 2017 updated by: Zahraa Magdy, Assiut University

Comparison Between Rescue Regimen and High Dose Methotrexate in the Managment of Presistent Gestational Trophoplastic Neoplasia :( A Randomized Controlled Trial )

Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) are malignant lesions that arise from abnormal proliferation of placental trophoblast. The pathologic conditions that make up this entity include invasive partial and complete hydatidiform mole, choriocarcinoma, placental site trophoblastic tumor (PSTT), and epithelioid trophoblastic tumor (ETT). GTN often arises after molar pregnancies but can also occur after any gestation including miscarriages and term pregnancies. In the United States, hydatidiform moles are observed in approximately 1/600 therapeutic abortions and 1/1000-2000 pregnancies . Most cases of GTN are diagnosed when the serum hCG levels plateau or rise in patients being observed after the diagnosis of hydatidiform mole.These malignancies are highly susceptible to chemotherapy and it is often possible to achieve cure while preserving the woman's reproductive function

Study Overview

Detailed Description

When reporting GTN data, it is useful to use both the FIGO anatomic staging system and prognostic scoring system . A FIGO score of 6 or less indicates low-risk GTN whereas a score of 7 or more identifies high-risk disease.

Table 1- FIGO Anatomical staging of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia:

Stage I Disease confined to the uterus Stage II Disease extends to the outside of the uterus, but is limited to the genital structures Stage III Disease extends to the lungs, with or without genital tract involvement Stage IV All other metastatic sites

Table 2- FIGO Scoring system:

FIGO SCORING 0 1 2 4 Age (years) Antecedent pregnancy Interval months from end of index pregnancy to treatment Pretreatment serum hCG (iu/l) Largest tumour size, including uterus Site of metastases Number of metastases Previous failed chemotherapy <40 ≥40 - - mole abortion term <4 4-6 7-12 >12 <1000 1000-10000 10000-100000 >100000 <3cm 3-4cm ≥5 - Lung spleen&kidney GIT liver&brain

  • 1-4 5-8 >8
  • - 1 drug 2 or more drugs

RCOG guidelines (No. 38February 2010 ) recommends the use of rescue regimen of alternating methotrexate( MTX) and leucoverin for 8 days (class D). However, several protocols using MTX were described. No prospective randomised controlled trials have been done to compare the efficacy of resue regimen with the ther protocols. In a retrospective study done showed that high dose methotrexate regimen is more effective than the rescue regimen.

In addition, several concerns have been raised towards the use of leucoverin with methotrexate, although reducing the side effects, however, it may increase the resistence to the effect of MTX .

On the other hand, High dose regimen offers a less hospital stay which may be more convenient to the patients, together with the same incidence of side effects.

In our study we are going to compare the efficacy and tolerance of both regimens in patients diagnosed to have low risk PGTN.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

170

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age: 18-50
  • BW: 50-100 kg
  • willing and consenting to be enrolled in the study
  • Absence of active vaginal bleeding which requires surgical intervention • - WHO score <6

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Renal and liver dysfunction or blood dyscariasis
  • high risk persistent gestational trophoblastic disease.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: study group1
In the rescue regimen , we administer MTX in an eight-day treatment regimen consisting of four administrations of MTX given at 1 mg/kg I.M. every other day with folinic acid 0.1 mg/kg I.M,. given on intervening days.
In the rescue regimen , we administer MTX in an eight-day treatment regimen consisting of four administrations of TX given at 1 mg/kg I.M. every other day with folinic acid 0.1 mg/kg I.M,. given on intervening days.
Experimental: study group2
In the high dose MTX protocol, the patients will receive 100 mg/m2 intravenous (IV) MTX bolus followed by 200 mg/m2IV MTX infused over 12 hours followed by folinic acid
In the high dose MTX protocol, the patients will receive 100 mg/m2 intravenous (IV) MTX bolus followed by 200 mg/m2IV MTX infused over 12 hours followed by folinic acid

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
cure rate
Time Frame: 12 month
cure rate till B hcG is negative and then 2 consolidation regimens
12 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
decline in Bhcg
Time Frame: 12 month
Number of cycles for decline in BhCG
12 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

October 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 11, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 11, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

September 13, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 13, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 11, 2017

Last Verified

September 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gestational Trophoblastic Disease

Clinical Trials on rescue regimen

3
Subscribe