Secondary Findings From High-throughput Sequencing: How to Announce Them With Respect to the Patient's Needs (FIND)

September 13, 2022 updated by: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon

Incidental Findings Produced by Diagnostic HTS: From the Needs of Patients to Organisational Considerations

High-throughput whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is bringing new opportunities in the diagnosis of rare diseases. It will more frequently lead to a primary diagnosis (aim of the genetic consultation), but it may also lead to the discovery of mutations not related to the patient's disease. These findings are called "incidental findings" (IF) and may give rise to preventive or curative interventions in a personalised medicine approach.

The question of proposing to patients access to all or part of these findings is a matter of debate in France and elsewhere. This question has given rise to new challenges and new needs that professionals must respond to by implementing appropriate management and new skills. It raises specific ethical issues, which require precise understanding of the expectations and experiences of patients. Patients' diagnostic trajectories must also meet criteria for efficacy and financial and organisational sustainability for the healthcare establishments and, for the healthcare system. Our project aims to assess the expectations of patients/parents with regard to this opportunity, and to determine how information should be provided to patients and how they should be accompanied to ensure efficient and appropriate management.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

342

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Dijon, France, 21079
        • CHU Dijon Bourgogne
      • Lyon, France, 69000
        • Hospices civils de Lyon
      • Paris, France, 75013
        • Groupe Hospitalier Pitie-Salpetriere

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults or parents of of deceased foetuses/children (alive or deceased) or adults living under guardianship or deceased, with Development Disorders(DD) who will undergo WES for the first time for diagnostic purposes
  • Consent to take part in the study
  • Desire to screen for at least one group of IF
  • Able to speak fluent French.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients withough national health insurance cover
  • Absence of consent from the patient or his/her legal representative

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Negative IF result
an interview with a psychologist / sociologist will take place after completion of the on-site questionnaires to find out the reasons for their choice of accessing their secondary data and their experiences with the secondary data reported.
Experimental: Positive IF result
an interview with a psychologist / sociologist will take place after completion of the on-site questionnaires to find out the reasons for their choice of accessing their secondary data and their experiences with the secondary data reported.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Questionnaires on the expectations of patients/parents with regard to incidental findings (IF)
Time Frame: first day of the study
first day of the study
1) Questionnaires on their experience following the disclosure of IF (positive and negative), and their perception, needs and expectations with regard to the way the results are given.
Time Frame: at 6 months after the inclusion
at 6 months after the inclusion
2) Questionnaires on the repercussions of access to IF, in terms of experience/ appropriation of the results, needs and expectations in terms of accompaniment following disclosure of the results, and the recourse to care.
Time Frame: at 12 months after the inclusion
at 12 months after the inclusion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 13, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 24, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

November 24, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 18, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 18, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

September 20, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 14, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 13, 2022

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • OLIVIER-FAIVRE PREPS 2016

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Development Disorders

Clinical Trials on interviews with a psychologist

Subscribe