Immune Evidence to the Consumption of Lactobacillus GG and FOS Consumption in Patients With Herpes Labialis (EVIM2)

October 10, 2017 updated by: Sprim Advanced Life Sciences

A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-controlled Multicenter Clinical Study to Evaluate the Effect of a Combination of Probiotics and Prebiotics in Subjects With Recurrent Herpes Labialis

Herpes labialis (HL) is the result of the presence of a virus called HSV-1 and is a common disease. Because of its visibility due to cold sores it has a serious impact on social life. Until now there is no effective treatment to prevent virus outbreaks. However, prebiotics and probiotics have both been shown to have a favorable and supportive effect on the immune system in different health conditions such as influenza, atopic dermatitis and diarrhea, so it is possible that they are able to have a favourable effect also on HL.

A recently completed pilot clinical trial (Protocol Number 08-SBUS-2-GRA-01, EVIM-1) was completed using a fermented milk (minidrink) containing a combination of L. rhamnosus and FOS; it showed promising results in the reduction of HL recurrences in a population of 78 subjects with HSV-1. The study investigated the effect of pre- or probiotics or a combination of the two on the recurrence of HL lesions as well as on the immune system in general, showing that the consumption of a minidrink containing the probiotic L. rhamnosus or a minidrink containing a combination of L. rhamnosus and FOS reduced the occurrence and the incidence of recurrent HL lesions.

Aim of this study: corroborate whether the consumption of a minidrink containing a combination of L. rhamnosus and FOS results in less recurrence and a better progression of HL lesion, in a larger population. In addition, the response of the consumption of the minidrink on the QoL and the response on immunity specific biomarkers were evaluated.

Design: 152 patients were eligible to participate in the study and after a run-in period of two weeks consuming a placebo minidrink were randomized to one of the two experimental study groups: placebo minidrink (n=79) and a minidrink containing a combination of a pre- and probiotic (n=78). These minidrinks were consumed until the end of the study (day 140). At day 33 of the study the lip most prone to the development of a lesion was stimulated with UVB to provoke a lesion. During the entire study period subjects were checked for any clinical signs of a lesion, completed a self-assessment regarding the lesion and a QoL questionnaire at baseline (day 14), at day 49 and the end of the study (day 140). In addition, a blood sample was collected at baseline, at day 49 and at the end of the study to be analyzed for HSV-specific antibody concentrations , to check immune system specific functions.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background: Herpes labialis is the result of the presence of HSV-1 and is a common disease. Because of its visibility it has a serious impact on social life. Until now there is no effective treatment to prevent virus outbreaks. However, prebiotics and probiotics have both been shown to have a favorable and supportive effect on the immune system in different health conditions such as influenza, atopic dermatitis and diarrhea.

A recently completed pilot clinical trial (Protocol Number 08-SBUS-2-GRA-01, EVIM-1) parallel groups, placebo controlled, triple blind, single center, randomized study, with a fermented milk (minidrink) containing a combination of L. rhamnosus and FOS showed promising results in the reduction of HL recurrences in a population of 78 subjects with HSV-1; the study investigated the effect of pre- or probiotics or a combination of the two on the recurrence of HL lesions as well as on the immune system in general, showing that the consumption of a minidrink containing the probiotic L. rhamnosus or a minidrink containing a combination of L. rhamnosus and FOS reduced the occurrence and the incidence of recurrent HL lesions.

Aim of the study: corroborate whether the consumption of a minidrink containing a combination of L. rhamnosus and FOS results in less recurrence and a better progression of HL lesion, in a larger population. In addition, the response of the consumption of the minidrink on the QoL and the response on immunity specific biomarkers were evaluated.

Design: 152 patients were eligible to participate in the study and after a run-in period of two weeks consuming a placebo minidrink were randomized to one of the two experimental study groups: placebo minidrink (n=79) and a minidrink containing a combination of a pre- and probiotic (n=78). These minidrinks were consumed until the end of the study (day 140). At day 33 of the study the lip most prone to the development of a lesion was stimulated with UVB to provoke a lesion. During the entire study period subjects were checked for any clinical signs of a lesion, completed a self-assessment regarding the lesion and a QoL questionnaire at baseline (day 14), at day 49 and the end of the study (day 140). In addition, a blood sample was collected at baseline, at day 49 and at the end of the study to be analyzed for HSV-specific antibody concentrations (circulating concentrations of IgG1 and IgG3 (Th1) and IgG4 (Th2), NK activity, CXCL10 analyzed by ELISA at days 14, 49 and 140).

as regards the primary endpoint results have shown that there was a significant decrease (54.3%) in the recurrences of Herpes labialis lesions, post UV stimulation, at day 49 (V4) compared to placebo in the PP population with consumption of the study product minidrink with fermented low fat milk added with Lactobacillus rhamnosus and FOS. Considering the secondary endpoints in the PP population, considering the number of subjects who presented lesions between V0 and V5, the number of lesions is reduced significantly (both statistically and clinically) in the treatment group compared to the placebo group. There was a decrease in the lesion size in the treatment group when compared to placebo although the statistical significance is marginal. As regards 'Subjective assessment of pain', evaluated by means of a VAS scale, significant pain reduction was found in the treatment group compared to the placebo group. As regards immunological parameters was shown an increase in CXCL10 at V4 in the study group compared to the placebo group. As regards IgG1, IgG3 and IgG4 (V0, V4 and V5) although substantial increases were registered for some of these parameters, these were not sufficient to describe a definite trend. The natural killer (NK) cell activity did not show significant difference in their functional activity in the treatment group as compared to the placebo group.

It has been verified through quality of life questionnaire (SF-36 questionnaire) that treatment improved Mental Health in the treatment group (Nervous, Peaceful, Happy, Down in Dumps, Sad) compared to the placebo group and clinical significance was found at V4 and V5. General Health and Vitality has been improved at V4 and V5.

For each trial participant the adverse events/serious adverse events occurrences and a brief clinical examination were assessed. No special or unusual features of the safety evaluations were found.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

157

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 63 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy free-living men and women aged 18 to 65 years-old.
  • History of recurrent HL (2 - 4 episodes) after exposure to sunlight in the previous 12 months.
  • Fitzpatrick skin type 1 to 4 (appendix 1 of the study protocol).
  • No presence of HL lesions at time of recruitment, including baseline.
  • Agreement to adhere to the prescribed list of dietary recommendations provided at the start of the study (appendix 3 of the study protocol).
  • Women of child-bearing potential are required to use adequate birth protection during the study.
  • Sign and date the ICF to and to comply with study procedures

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of acute/terminal disease.
  • Intolerance for milk protein or lactose.
  • Treatment with acyclovir or other medication believed to interfere with immune responses at the time of the study.
  • Participation in any herpes UV reactivation study within the previous three months.
  • Pregnancy or lactation.
  • Any condition (e.g. schizophrenia, psychosis, major depression or mental deficiency) or major co-morbidity that the study investigator thinks might compromise the person's ability to comply with the requirements of the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: placebo
one bottle of placebo (minidrink fermented with low-fat milk but without Lactobacillus rhamnosus and without FOS, and without viable bacteria 90 grams)
one bottle of placebo (minidrink fermented with low-fat milk but without Lactobacillus rhamnosus and without FOS, and without viable bacteria 90 grams)per day at breakfast until the end of the study (V5, day 140). At each visit, subjects were dispensed a sufficient amount of minidrinks until the next visit.
Active Comparator: Prebiotics and Probiotics
one bottle of the study product (minidrink with fermented low-fat milk added with Lactobacillus rhamnosus (Lactobacillus rhamnosus) and fructooligosaccharides (FOS), 90 grams)
one bottle of the study product (minidrink with fermented low-fat milk added with Lactobacillus rhamnosus (Lactobacillus rhamnosus) and fructooligosaccharides (FOS),per day at breakfast until the end of the study (V5, day 140). At each visit, subjects were dispensed a sufficient amount of minidrinks until the next visit.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
reduction of HL recurrence.
Time Frame: Day 49
to evaluate the coadjuvant effect of the combination of prebiotic and probiotic mix in the reduction of the number of HL recurrences at day 49 vs baseline.
Day 49

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
reduction of HL recurrence.
Time Frame: day 14
to evaluate the coadjuvant effect of the combination of prebiotic and probiotic mix in the reduction of the number of HL recurrences at day 49 vs baseline.
day 14
reduction of HL recurrence.
Time Frame: day 140
to evaluate the coadjuvant effect of the combination of prebiotic and probiotic mix in the reduction of the number of HL recurrences at day 49 vs baseline.
day 140
change IGS markers concentration
Time Frame: day 14
Evaluate the effect of the combination of prebiotic and probiotic mix on specific IGs markers;
day 14
change IGS markers concentration
Time Frame: day 49
Evaluate the effect of the combination of prebiotic and probiotic mix on specific IGs markers;
day 49
change IGS markers concentration
Time Frame: day 140
Evaluate the effect of the combination of prebiotic and probiotic mix on specific IGs markers;
day 140
time to healing
Time Frame: Day 14
Evaluate the coadjuvant effect of the combination of prebiotic and probiotic mix in the time to healing, defined as either loss of the hard crust or return to normal skin (measured in days);
Day 14
time to healing
Time Frame: Day 49
Evaluate the coadjuvant effect of the combination of prebiotic and probiotic mix in the time to healing, defined as either loss of the hard crust or return to normal skin (measured in days);
Day 49
time to healing
Time Frame: Day 140
Evaluate the coadjuvant effect of the combination of prebiotic and probiotic mix in the time to healing, defined as either loss of the hard crust or return to normal skin (measured in days);
Day 140
lesion size
Time Frame: Day 14
Evaluate measurement of lesion size as a product of the length and the width of the lesion development (measured in mm2) by classification of lesion stage
Day 14
lesion size
Time Frame: Day 49
Evaluate measurement of lesion size as a product of the length and the width of the lesion development (measured in mm2) by classification of lesion stage
Day 49
lesion size
Time Frame: Day 140
Evaluate measurement of lesion size as a product of the length and the width of the lesion development (measured in mm2) by classification of lesion stage
Day 140
SF-36
Time Frame: Day 14
Evaluate quality of life by means of SF-36 questionnaire
Day 14
SF-36
Time Frame: Day 49
Evaluate quality of life by means of SF-36 questionnaire
Day 49
SF-36
Time Frame: Day 140
Evaluate quality of life by means of SF-36 questionnaire
Day 140

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michelangelo La Placa, master, Dipartimento di Medicina Interna, dell'Invecchiamento e Malattie Nefrologiche Università degli Studi di Bologna

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 14, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 5, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 4, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 10, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

October 16, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 16, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 10, 2017

Last Verified

October 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Herpes Labialis

Clinical Trials on Placebo

3
Subscribe