A Collaborative Palliative and Leukemia Care Model for Patients With AML and MDS Receiving Non-Intensive Therapy

March 30, 2026 updated by: El-Jawahri, Areej,M.D., Massachusetts General Hospital

Randomized Trial of a Collaborative Palliative and Leukemia Care Model for Patients With AML and MDS Receiving Non-Intensive Therapy

This research study is evaluating the impact a collaborative palliative care and oncology team will have on end-of-life outcomes, quality of end-of-life care, and the quality of life, symptoms, and mood of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) receiving non-intensive therapy

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Frequently people undergoing treatment for AML or MDS experience physical and emotional symptoms during the course of their illness. These can be very distressing to both patients and their caregivers. Patients with AML or MDS receiving non-intensive therapy also often experience a rapid decline in their health status and have a limited prognosis. Despite their limited life-expectancy, they rarely engage in discussion with their clinicians regarding their goals and preferences for care at the end of life. The study doctors want to know if the early introduction of a team of clinicians that specialize in the lessening (palliation) of many of these distressing symptoms and have expertise in enhancing communication about prognosis and illness trajectory may improve the overall care of patients with acute leukemia.

This team of clinicians is called the palliative care team and they focus on ways to improve the participant's pain and other symptom management (nausea, fatigue, shortness of breath, anxiety, etc.) and to assist the participant and the participant's caregivers in coping with the emotional and social issues associated with their diagnosis. The team consists of physicians and advance practice nurses who have been specially trained in the care of patients facing serious illness.

The main purpose of this study is to compare two types of care - standard oncology care and standard oncology care with collaborative involvement of palliative care clinicians to see which is better for improving the experience of patients with AML and MDS undergoing treatment.

The purpose of this research study is to find out whether introducing patients undergoing treatment for AML or MDS to the palliative care team can improve their end-of-life communication, understanding of their prognosis, and their physical and psychological symptoms during the course of their illness.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

320

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
        • Ohio State University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with AML receiving non-intensive therapy including hypomethylating agents, single-agent chemotherapy, targeted therapy agents, or single or combination non-intensive agents offered on a clinical trial, including the following populations:

    • Newly diagnosed AML
    • Relapsed AML
    • Primary refractory AML
  • The ability to provide informed consent
  • The ability to comprehend English or complete questionnaires with minimal assistance of an interpreter

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients not receiving care at MGH
  • Patients receiving intensive chemotherapy (requiring 4-6 week hospitalization)
  • Patients receiving supportive care alone
  • Major psychiatric illness or co-morbid conditions prohibiting compliance with study procedures
  • Patients already receiving palliative care

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Collaborative palliative and oncology care
  • 1st palliative care visit within 30 days of randomization in the outpatient or hospital
  • In outpatient setting: once monthly palliative care visits (or video/ or phone)
  • During hospital admissions: At least twice weekly palliative care visits
Specialized medical care for people with serious illness. This type of care is focused on providing relief from the symptoms and stress of a serious illness. The goal is to improve quality of life for both the patient and the family
Standard care per the hospital guideline
Active Comparator: Standard oncology care
  • Palliative care consults only upon request
  • Standard oncology care
Standard care per the hospital guideline

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time from documentation of end-of-life care preferences to death
Time Frame: up to 2 years
comparison of time from documentation of end-of-life care preferences to death in the electronic health records
up to 2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rates of documentation of end-of-life care preferences at least one week prior to death.
Time Frame: up to 2 years
Comparison of the rate of documentation of end-of-life care preferences at least one week prior to death in the electronic health record
up to 2 years
Patient-report of discussing end-of-life care preferences based on an item from the perception of treatment and prognosis questionnaire
Time Frame: up to 2 years
comparison of patient-report of discussion end-of-life care preferences between the study arms
up to 2 years
Compare Rate of hospitalization between the study arms
Time Frame: up to 30 days
Compare rates of hospitalizations within 30 days of death between the study arms
up to 30 days
Rate of hospice utilization and length-of-stay in hospice
Time Frame: up to 2 years
Compare rates of hospice utilization and length-of-stay in hospice at the end of life between the study arms
up to 2 years
compare quality of life
Time Frame: up to six months
Compare quality of life (FACT-Leuk) at week-12 and longitudinally between the study arms. Score range 0-176 (higher scores indicating better quality of life)
up to six months
compare symptom burden
Time Frame: up to six months
Compare symptom burden (ESAS) at week-12 and longitudinally between the study arms. the ESAS score range 0-100 with higher scores indicating worse symptom burden.
up to six months
compare mood
Time Frame: up to six months
Compare change in mood (HADS) at week-12, and longitudinally between the study arms. HADS measures depression and anxiety symptoms (subscale range 0-21) higher scores indicating worse mood symptoms
up to six months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
caregiver-reported discussion of end-of-life care preferences as measured by the perception of treatment and prognosis questionnaire
Time Frame: one month
compare caregiver-reported discussion of end-of-life care preferences between the study arms at one month
one month
Rate of chemotherapy administration
Time Frame: up to 30 days prior to death
compare rate of chemotherapy administration within 30 days of death between the two study arms
up to 30 days prior to death
Rates of death in the hospital
Time Frame: up to 2 years
compare rates of death in the hospital between the two study arms
up to 2 years
Compare quality of end-of-life care between the two study arms
Time Frame: up to 2 years
compare quality of end-of-life care (FAMCARE) as reported by caregivers between the two study arms. FAMCARE score range 0-100, higher scores indicate better quality of end-of-life care
up to 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Areej El-Jawahri, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 31, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 2, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 10, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

October 16, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 30, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Clinical Trials on Palliative Care

Subscribe