A Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Adalimumab in Active Ulcer(s) of Pyoderma Gangrenosum in Participants in Japan

March 5, 2021 updated by: AbbVie

A Phase 3 Multicenter, Open-Label, Single Arm Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Adalimumab in Active Ulcer(s) of Pyoderma Gangrenosum in Subjects in Japan

This study is designed to investigate the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of adalimumab in subjects in Japan with active ulcer(s) due to Pyoderma Gangrenosum (PG).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

22

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hirakata-shi, Osaka, Japan, 573-1191
        • Kansai Medical Univ Hosp /ID# 165802
      • Sapporo, Japan, 060-8648
        • Hokkaido University Hospital /ID# 164419
    • Aichi
      • Nagoya-shi, Aichi, Japan, 467-8602
        • Nagoya City University Hospital /ID# 164510
    • Chiba
      • Urayasu Shi, Chiba, Japan, 279-0021
        • Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital /ID# 164422
    • Fukuoka
      • Fukuoka-shi, Fukuoka, Japan, 814-0180
        • Fukuoka University Hospital /ID# 164416
    • Fukushima
      • Fukushima-shi, Fukushima, Japan, 960-1295
        • Fukushima Medical University Hospital /ID# 164358
    • Gunma
      • Maebashi-shi, Gunma, Japan, 371-8511
        • Gunma University Hospital /ID# 164464
    • Hokkaido
      • Asahikawa-shi, Hokkaido, Japan, 078-8510
        • Asahikawa Medical University Hospital /ID# 164589
    • Kanagawa
      • Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa, Japan, 227-0043
        • Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital /ID# 164406
    • Mie
      • Tsu-shi, Mie, Japan, 514-8507
        • Mie University Hospital /ID# 164389
    • Miyagi
      • Sendai-shi, Miyagi, Japan, 980-8574
        • Tohoku University Hospital /ID# 164360
    • Nagano
      • Matsumoto-shi, Nagano, Japan, 〒390-8621
        • Shinshu University Hospital /ID# 164852
    • Nagasaki
      • Nagasaki-shi, Nagasaki, Japan, 852-8501
        • Nagasaki University Hospital /ID# 167604
    • Okinawa
      • Nakagami-gun, Okinawa, Japan, 903-0215
        • University of the Ryukyus Hospital /ID# 164981
    • Shizuoka
      • Hamamatsu-shi, Shizuoka, Japan, 431-3192
        • Hamamatsu University Hospital /ID# 165890
    • Tokushima
      • Tokushima-shi, Tokushima, Japan, 770-8503
        • Tokushima University Hospital /ID# 164359
    • Tokyo
      • Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 173-8605
        • Teikyo University Hospital /ID# 165665
      • Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 160-0023
        • Tokyo Medical University Hospital /ID# 165810
      • Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 160-8582
        • Keio University Hospital /ID# 165680
    • Yamaguchi
      • Ube-shi, Yamaguchi, Japan, 7558505
        • Yamaguchi University Hospital /ID# 164562

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participant must be able and willing to provide written informed consent. If the participant is < 20 years old, a parent or legal guardian must be willing to give written informed consent
  • Participants must have a diagnosis of ulcerative (classic) PG made by the Investigator
  • Participants must have demonstrated an inadequate response to conventional PG therapy or in the opinion of the Investigator they are not a suitable candidate for conventional PG treatment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants with pustular, bullous/atypical, or vegetative variants of PG
  • Participants with clinical evidence of ulceration that is non-PG related, vasculitis, thrombosisprone conditions, or monoclonal gammopathy
  • Participants with a histopathological finding that is consistent with a diagnosis other than PG
  • Participants receiving a therapeutic dose of prednisolone
  • Participants with prior exposure to adalimumab or previous participation in an adalimumab clinical study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm A
Participants receiving adalimumab for Pyoderma Gangrenosum active ulcer(s).
Study drug will be administered subcutaneously.
Other Names:
  • Humira®

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of participants who have achieved target Pyoderma Gangrenosum Area Reduction (PGAR)
Time Frame: Week 26
The participants will be assessed whether they meet target PGAR at Week 26 based on PGAR score.
Week 26

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of participants achieving Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) 0 or 1
Time Frame: Week 6 and Week 26
The Investigator assesses the global improvement of all ulcers including the target ulcer according to the scales at the specified visits.
Week 6 and Week 26
Mean time to occurrence of new PG ulcers
Time Frame: Up to Week 26
A new PG ulcer is defined as not present at Baseline and not caused by the epithelial bridging of an existing ulcer at Baseline. The time after Baseline when the new lesion was observed will be recorded.
Up to Week 26
Change from Baseline in total number of active ulcers
Time Frame: Week 26
The number of all active PG ulcers will be counted at the specified visits.
Week 26
Change from Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)
Time Frame: Week 6 and Week 26
The DLQI will be used to assess the symptoms and the impact of skin problems on quality of life.
Week 6 and Week 26
Changes from Baseline in total ulcer area
Time Frame: Week 6 and Week 26
The change in total ulcer area is assessed.
Week 6 and Week 26
Proportion of participants with inflammation reduction as assessed on an Investigator Inflammation Assessment (IIA) Score
Time Frame: Up to Week 26
The Investigator assesses the inflammation status of the target ulcer at the specified visits according to the scales.
Up to Week 26
Mean time to occurrence of a new PG ulcer(s)
Time Frame: Up to Week 52
Mean time to occurrence of a new PG ulcer(s) is assessed.
Up to Week 52
Mean time to healing of target ulcer
Time Frame: Up to Week 52
The PG Area Reduction (PGAR) is calculated as the percentage area change in the target PG ulcer from Baseline.
Up to Week 52
Proportion of participants achieving healing per PGAR for the target ulcer
Time Frame: Week 52
The PG Area Reduction (PGAR) is calculated as the percentage area change in the target PG ulcer from Baseline.
Week 52
Proportion of participants who have achieved target PGAR
Time Frame: Up to Week 26
The PG Area Reduction (PGAR) is calculated as the percentage area change in the target PG ulcer from Baseline.
Up to Week 26
Percentage change in target Pyoderma Gangrenosum (PG) ulcer area
Time Frame: Up to Week 26
The percentage change in target PG ulcer area is assessed.
Up to Week 26
Proportion of participants achieving PGA 0
Time Frame: Week 6 and Week 26
The Investigator assesses the global improvement of all ulcers including the target ulcer according to the scales at the specified visits.
Week 6 and Week 26
Change from Baseline in Pain as measured by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
Time Frame: Week 6 and Week 26
The Numerical Rating Scale of Pain sheet will be filled out in the office by participants at the designated visits.
Week 6 and Week 26
Changes from baseline in the proportion of participants taking analgesics
Time Frame: Week 6 and Week 26
Proportion of participants taking analgesics is assessed.
Week 6 and Week 26
Velocities of healing
Time Frame: Up to Week 26
This is assessed from baseline.
Up to Week 26
Proportion of participants achieving ulcer healing as assessed by PGAR
Time Frame: Week 6
The PG Area Reduction (PGAR) is calculated as the percentage area change in the target PG ulcer from Baseline.
Week 6
Proportion of participants achieving PGA 0 of all PG ulcers
Time Frame: Week 52
The Investigator assesses the global improvement of all ulcers including the target ulcer according to the scales at the specified visits.
Week 52
Mean time to relapse of the target PG ulcer
Time Frame: Up to Week 26
The PG Area Reduction (PGAR) is calculated as the percentage area change in the target PG ulcer from Baseline.
Up to Week 26
Mean time to healing as defined by PGAR
Time Frame: Up to Week 26
The PG Area Reduction (PGAR) is calculated as the percentage area change in the target PG ulcer from Baseline.
Up to Week 26

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 27, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 20, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

April 21, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 12, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 12, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

October 17, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 9, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 5, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

AbbVie is committed to responsible data sharing regarding the clinical trials we sponsor. This includes access to anonymized, individual and trial-level data (analysis data sets), as well as other information (e.g., protocols and clinical study reports), as long as the trials are not part of an ongoing or planned regulatory submission. This includes requests for clinical trial data for unlicensed products and indications.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data requests can be submitted at any time and the data will be accessible for 12 months, with possible extensions considered.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access to this clinical trial data can be requested by any qualified researchers who engage in rigorous, independent scientific research, and will be provided following review and approval of a research proposal and Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) and execution of a Data Sharing Agreement (DSA). For more information on the process, or to submit a request, visit the following link.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)
  • Analytic Code

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pyoderma Gangrenosum

Clinical Trials on adalimumab

3
Subscribe