Evaluation of an Effectiveness and Safety of the Electroacupuncture in the Management of Intractable Neuropathic Pain

September 12, 2022 updated by: Jeeyoun Moon, Seoul National University

Evaluation of an Effectiveness and Safety of the Electroacupuncture in the Management of Intractable Neuropathic Pain: An Open-labeled, Single-arm, Exploratory Pilot Study

The investigators will evaluate the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture treatment in refractory neuropathic pain patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of acupuncture treatment in the patients with the following neuropathic pain related syndrome.

  • Postherpetic neuralgia
  • Failed back surgery syndrome
  • Diabetic neuropathy
  • other peripheral neuropathy

Patients with refractory neuropathic pain who do not respond to conservative treatment for more than 3 months should be included. Acupuncture treatment is maintained for 2 months in oriental medicine hospital. The effect is evaluated through the numeric rating score and the validated questionnaire.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

22

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who can adequately write a reportable questionnaire
  • Patients who have been diagnosed with one of the following neuropathic pain disease (postherpetic neuralgia, failed back surgery syndrome, diabetic neuropathy, other peripheral neuropathy)
  • Patients who failed conservative treatment at Seoul National University Hospital for more than 3 months.
  • Patients with NRS 5 points or more
  • Patients with painDETECT score 19 points or more

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with major mental illness
  • Patients with unstable medical conditions
  • Pregnant
  • Patients who received acupuncture treatment at the site within the past month
  • Patients with bleeding tendency
  • Patients taking immunosuppressive drugs

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: An open-labeled, single-arm, exploratory pilot study
Electroacupunture for 2months
lectroacupuncture is a form of acupuncture where a small electric current is passed between pairs of acupuncture needles. According to some acupuncturists, this practice augments the use of regular acupuncture, can restore health and well-being, and is particularly good for treating pain.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline Numeric rating scale pain score (0-10) at 4 weeks
Time Frame: At 4-week follow-up visit
The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is an 11-point scale from 0 to 10 for patient self-reporting of pain. Change from the baseline NRS pain score at 4 weeks will be noted as percentage (%).
At 4-week follow-up visit
Change from baseline Numeric rating scale pain score (0-10) at 8 weeks
Time Frame: At 8-week follow-up visit
The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is an 11-point scale from 0 to 10 for patient self-reporting of pain. Change from the baseline NRS pain score at 4 weeks will be noted as percentage (%).
At 8-week follow-up visit

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from the score of the short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire at 8 weeks
Time Frame: At 8-week follow-up visit
The main component of the SF-MPQ consists of 15 descriptors (11 sensory; 4 affective) which are rated on an intensity scale as 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate or 3 = severe. Three pain scores are derived from the sum of the intensity rank values of the words chosen for sensory, affective and total descriptors. The SF-MPQ also includes the Present Pain Intensity (PPI) index of the standard MPQ and a visual analogue scale (VAS).
At 8-week follow-up visit
Change from baseline score of Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BFI-SF) at 8 weeks
Time Frame: At 8-week follow-up visit
The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) rapidly assesses the severity of pain and its impact on functioning.
At 8-week follow-up visit
Patients' Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale
Time Frame: At 8-week follow-up visit

The self-report measure Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) reflects a patient's belief about the efficacy of treatment.

1=very much improved since the initiation of treatment; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change from baseline (the initiation of treatment); 5=minimally worse; 6= much worse; 7=very much worse since the initiation of treatment.

At 8-week follow-up visit
5-pointed patient satisfaction scale
Time Frame: At 8-week follow-up visit

The 5-pointed patient satisfaction scale is an 5-point scale for patient self-reporting of satisfaction with treatment.

  1. Very satisfied
  2. Satisfied
  3. Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied
  4. Dissatisfied
  5. Very dissatisfied
At 8-week follow-up visit

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jee Youn Moon, Professor, Seoul National University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

May 15, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

February 23, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

February 23, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 12, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 16, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

October 20, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 14, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 12, 2022

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neuralgia

Clinical Trials on Electroacupuncture

3
Subscribe