Feasibility of a Social Media-based Weight Loss Program for Low Socioeconomic Status Individuals

March 15, 2021 updated by: Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

A Pilot Intervention Study to Examine the Feasibility of a Social Media-Based Weight Loss Program for Low Socioeconomic Status Individuals

The purpose of this study is to see if it is practical to use social media-based and traditional online weight loss intervention components among low socioeconomic status participants using the Facebook social media (SM) and Fitbit self-monitoring platforms. Also, the study will test the effectiveness of recruiting participants via social media and at community events and locations. The results of this study will be used to inform future research studies.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The primary objectives of the proposed research are to:

  1. assess the feasibility of social media-based (social support, social competition, and social rewards) and traditional online weight loss (education and goal setting) intervention components delivered to low-Socioeconomic Status (SES) participants using the Facebook SM and Fitbit self-monitoring platforms and
  2. develop and assess methods for recruiting and retaining adequate numbers of low-SES participants for a future randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy of an SM-based weight loss intervention. The study team will assess feasibility by conducting a 12-week pilot test of traditional and social media-based weight loss intervention components followed by qualitative and quantitative assessment with pilot participants.

The specific aims are:

Aim 1- Assess trial feasibility: The study team will assess intervention processes critical to the success of a larger efficacy trial during the 12-week pilot including: (1) participant recruitment and retention, (2) participant use of intervention components, (3) use of data collection strategies and instruments.

Aim 2 - Assess intervention acceptability: The study team will conduct structured interviews and surveys among participants to assess participants' experience during the intervention. This study focuses on: (1) intervention design and content, (2) participant use of intervention technologies (Facebook and Fitbit), (3) participant concerns about privacy, and (4) barriers and facilitators to recruitment, retention, and participation. Findings will be used to improve the design of a larger efficacy trial.

Study Design: This study will employ a one group pre-post design.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

55

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106
        • Case Western Reserve Univeristy

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

35 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • able to speak English
  • regular access to an internet-enabled device that can be synched with the Fitbit wristband
  • Body mass index (BMI) 25-40 kg/m^2
  • < 30 minutes per day of self-reported moderate or vigorous physical activity
  • Considered eligible for Ohio Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program (EFNEP) income guidelines
  • located in the greater Cleveland metropolitan area
  • not pregnant or planning on becoming pregnant
  • answers 'no' to all questions on the PA Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q) or is cleared in writing by a physician
  • does not have a recent history of alcohol or drug abuse or is in treatment
  • does not have schizophrenia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Does not meet all inclusion criteria

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Physical Activity + Diet + Social media
Educational materials for the proposed study will be delivered via a secret social media Facebook group. These materials will promote simple, attainable forms of Physical Activity and lasting diet changes. A study moderator will deliver weekly communications to the Facebook group providing intervention content including social support, social competition and comparison, and social rewards
Fitbit Activity Monitor and IPAQ to give level of physical activity. Participants will be provided with education about physical activity recommendations and will be encouraged to set goals for improvement.
National Cancer Institute's ASA24 web-based dietary assessment tool to determine intake. Participants will be provided with education about healthy diets and will be encouraged to set goals for making enduring changes to dietary intake.
Social support will be determined via self report scale measure and objective collection of social media communications. Each participant will be contacted through social media regularly with dietary and physical activity information and asked to support other participants via encouragement and sharing of information.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ratio or participants screened to patients completing 12-week measures
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
This is a measure of feasibility
Up to 12 weeks
Average score of adapted INSHAPE computer-based questionnaire
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
Computer-based questionnaires will be self-administered via the Qualtrics Survey platform. INSHAPE questionnaire is a 14 question survey gauging acceptability of the program
Up to 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of eligible participants
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
This is a measure of feasibility
Up to 12 weeks
Number of consented participants
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
This is a measure of feasibility
Up to 12 weeks
Average change in Fitbit activity
Time Frame: From baseline to 12 weeks
This is a measure of physical activity
From baseline to 12 weeks
Average change in International physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ) score
Time Frame: From baseline to 12 weeks
This is a measure of physical activity
From baseline to 12 weeks
Average change in score of the National Cancer Institute's Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour (ASA24) dietary assessment web-based assessment tool
Time Frame: From baseline to 12 weeks
This is a measure of dietary intake
From baseline to 12 weeks
Change in weight
Time Frame: From baseline to 12 weeks
Trained study staff will determine weight at baseline and 12 weeks of the study
From baseline to 12 weeks
Change in waist circumference
Time Frame: From baseline to 12 weeks
Trained study staff will determine waist circumference at baseline and 12 weeks of the study
From baseline to 12 weeks
Average change in social support score
Time Frame: From baseline to 12 weeks
This is a 31 question, multiple choice survey adapted from Gruber and Sallis
From baseline to 12 weeks
Average change in weight loss self-efficacy score
Time Frame: From baseline to 12 weeks
Multiple choice questions and short answer survey which can be scored to gauge weight-loss self-efficacy. Adapted from Wilson
From baseline to 12 weeks
Average change in dietary knowledge
Time Frame: From baseline to 12 weeks
Multiple choice questions and short answer survey which can be scored to gauge dietary knowledge. Adapted from Jones
From baseline to 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David N. Cavallo, PhD MPH RDN, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 31, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 6, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

November 8, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 16, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 15, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CASE17Z17

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obesity

Clinical Trials on Physical Activity

Subscribe