- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03339557
Comparison of Three Knee Replacements
February 1, 2019 updated by: Tero Irmola, Coxa, Hospital for Joint Replacement
Functional Outcome of Total Knee Replacement. Randomized Clinical Controlled Trial of Novel and Conventional Implants
The present randomized controlled trial is designed to compare one novel total knee replacement (TKR) design and two conventional TKR designs in terms of functional outcome.
80 patients will be randomized in each of the three arms (240 altogether).
Study Overview
Status
Unknown
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The study will compare the short-term functional outcome (at 2 years) of TKR performed with a novel TKR design (Persona , Zimmer, Warsaw, IN, USA) against TKRs performed with two conventional designs (PFC, DePuy, Warsaw, IN, USA and Nexgen, Zimmer, Warsaw, IN, USA).
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
240
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Pirkanmaa
-
Tampere, Pirkanmaa, Finland, 33101
- Coxa, Hospital for Joint Replacement
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
50 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients undergoing total knee replacement surgery for primary osteoarthritis
- no previous open major surgery in the joint ( e.g. osteotomy)
- unilateral operative treatment, with no plans for surgical treatment of the contralateral knee in the near future
- patients living in the local hospital district (Pirkanmaa Hospital District)
- Kellgren-Lawrence grade 3-4 knee osteoarthritis in plain radiographs
Exclusion Criteria:
- Unwilling to provide informed consent
- > 15 degrees varus or valgus, or >15 degree fixed flexion deformity
- predominantly patellofemoral osteoarthritis
- Physical, emotional or neurological conditions that would compromise the patient´s compliance with postoperative rehabilitation and follow-up (e.g. drug or alcohol abuse, serious mental illness, general neurological conditions such as Parkinson, MS, etc.)
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: PFC Total Knee Replacement
PFC, Conventional design Perioperative treatment will be carried out according to routine protocol of the hospital.
|
Comparing two conventional designs and one novel design
Comparing two conventional designs and one novel design
|
|
Active Comparator: NexGen Total Knee Replacement
NexGen, Conventional design Perioperative treatment will be carried out according to routine protocol of the hospital.
|
Comparing two conventional designs and one novel design
Comparing two conventional designs and one novel design
|
|
Active Comparator: Persona Total Knee Replacement
Persona, Novel design Perioperative treatment will be carried out according to routine protocol of the hospital.
|
Comparing two conventional designs and one novel design
Comparing two conventional designs and one novel design
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in patient reported outcome measures scores (PROMs), Functional improvement
Time Frame: preoperative, postoperative at 2-3 months, at 1 year and at 2 years
|
Oxford Knee Score (OKS)
|
preoperative, postoperative at 2-3 months, at 1 year and at 2 years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in PROMs, Functional improvement
Time Frame: preoperative, postoperative at 2-3 months, at 1 year and at 2 years
|
Forgotten Joint Score (FJS)
|
preoperative, postoperative at 2-3 months, at 1 year and at 2 years
|
|
Changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL)
Time Frame: preoperative, postoperative at 2-3 months, at 1 year and at 2 years
|
15D
|
preoperative, postoperative at 2-3 months, at 1 year and at 2 years
|
|
Changes in activity rating scale
Time Frame: preoperative, postoperative at 2-3 months, at 1 year and at 2 years
|
UCLA activity score
|
preoperative, postoperative at 2-3 months, at 1 year and at 2 years
|
|
Changes in pain scale measurement
Time Frame: preoperative, postoperative at 2-3 months, at 1 year and at 2 years
|
VAS pain scale
|
preoperative, postoperative at 2-3 months, at 1 year and at 2 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Tero Irmola, MD, Coxa, Hospital for Joint Replacement
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Apr;89(4):780-5. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00222.
- Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KD. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Jan;468(1):57-63. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1119-9.
- Scott CE, Howie CR, MacDonald D, Biant LC. Predicting dissatisfaction following total knee replacement: a prospective study of 1217 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Sep;92(9):1253-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B9.24394.
- Hanusch BC, O'Connor DB, Ions P, Scott A, Gregg PJ. Effects of psychological distress and perceptions of illness on recovery from total knee replacement. Bone Joint J. 2014 Feb;96-B(2):210-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B2.31136.
- Ethgen O, Bruyere O, Richy F, Dardennes C, Reginster JY. Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 May;86(5):963-74. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200405000-00012.
- Dowsey MM, Nikpour M, Dieppe P, Choong PF. Associations between pre-operative radiographic osteoarthritis severity and pain and function after total hip replacement : Radiographic OA severity predicts function after THR. Clin Rheumatol. 2016 Jan;35(1):183-9. doi: 10.1007/s10067-014-2808-7. Epub 2014 Oct 24.
- Behrend H, Giesinger K, Giesinger JM, Kuster MS. The "forgotten joint" as the ultimate goal in joint arthroplasty: validation of a new patient-reported outcome measure. J Arthroplasty. 2012 Mar;27(3):430-436.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.06.035. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
- Klit J, Jacobsen S, Rosenlund S, Sonne-Holm S, Troelsen A. Total knee arthroplasty in younger patients evaluated by alternative outcome measures. J Arthroplasty. 2014 May;29(5):912-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.09.035. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
- Beswick AD, Wylde V, Gooberman-Hill R, Blom A, Dieppe P. What proportion of patients report long-term pain after total hip or knee replacement for osteoarthritis? A systematic review of prospective studies in unselected patients. BMJ Open. 2012 Feb 22;2(1):e000435. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000435. Print 2012.
- Giesinger K, Hamilton DF, Jost B, Holzner B, Giesinger JM. Comparative responsiveness of outcome measures for total knee arthroplasty. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2014 Feb;22(2):184-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2013.11.001. Epub 2013 Nov 18.
- Thienpont E, Opsomer G, Koninckx A, Houssiau F. Joint awareness in different types of knee arthroplasty evaluated with the Forgotten Joint score. J Arthroplasty. 2014 Jan;29(1):48-51. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.04.024. Epub 2013 May 18.
- Rasanen P, Paavolainen P, Sintonen H, Koivisto AM, Blom M, Ryynanen OP, Roine RP. Effectiveness of hip or knee replacement surgery in terms of quality-adjusted life years and costs. Acta Orthop. 2007 Feb;78(1):108-15. doi: 10.1080/17453670610013501.
- Jenkins PJ, Clement ND, Hamilton DF, Gaston P, Patton JT, Howie CR. Predicting the cost-effectiveness of total hip and knee replacement: a health economic analysis. Bone Joint J. 2013 Jan;95-B(1):115-21. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B1.29835.
- Hamilton DF, Gaston P, Simpson AH. Is patient reporting of physical function accurate following total knee replacement? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Nov;94(11):1506-10. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B11.30081.
- Grosu I, Lavand'homme P, Thienpont E. Pain after knee arthroplasty: an unresolved issue. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Aug;22(8):1744-58. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2750-2. Epub 2013 Nov 8.
- Singh JA, Gabriel S, Lewallen D. The impact of gender, age, and preoperative pain severity on pain after TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Nov;466(11):2717-23. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0399-9. Epub 2008 Aug 5.
- Perez-Prieto D, Gil-Gonzalez S, Pelfort X, Leal-Blanquet J, Puig-Verdie L, Hinarejos P. Influence of depression on total knee arthroplasty outcomes. J Arthroplasty. 2014 Jan;29(1):44-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.04.030. Epub 2013 May 20.
- Keurentjes JC, Fiocco M, So-Osman C, Onstenk R, Koopman-Van Gemert AW, Poll RG, Kroon HM, Vliet Vlieland TP, Nelissen RG. Patients with severe radiographic osteoarthritis have a better prognosis in physical functioning after hip and knee replacement: a cohort-study. PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e59500. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059500. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
- Berend KR, Lombardi AV Jr, Adams JB. Which total knee replacement implant should I pick? Correcting the pathology: the role of knee bearing designs. Bone Joint J. 2013 Nov;95-B(11 Suppl A):129-32. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B11.32835.
- van der Voort P, Pijls BG, Nouta KA, Valstar ER, Jacobs WC, Nelissen RG. A systematic review and meta-regression of mobile-bearing versus fixed-bearing total knee replacement in 41 studies. Bone Joint J. 2013 Sep;95-B(9):1209-16. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B9.30386.
- Becker R, Hirschmann MT, Karlsson J. Does implant design and surgical technique improve the clinical outcome in total knee arthroplasty? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Aug;22(8):1716-8. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-3145-8. No abstract available.
- Nunley RM, Nam D, Berend KR, Lombardi AV, Dennis DA, Della Valle CJ, Barrack RL. New total knee arthroplasty designs: do young patients notice? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jan;473(1):101-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3713-8.
- Baker PN, Deehan DJ, Lees D, Jameson S, Avery PJ, Gregg PJ, Reed MR. The effect of surgical factors on early patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) following total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Aug;94(8):1058-66. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B8.28786.
- Piepers MJ, van Hove RP, van den Bekerom MP, Nolte PA. Do refinements to original designs improve outcome of total knee replacement? A retrospective cohort study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2014 Feb 6;9:7. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-9-7.
- Pritchett JW. Patients prefer a bicruciate-retaining or the medial pivot total knee prosthesis. J Arthroplasty. 2011 Feb;26(2):224-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.02.012. Epub 2010 Oct 6.
- Irmola T, Kangas J, Eskelinen A, Niemelainen M, Huhtala H, Mattila VM, Moilanen T. Functional outcome of total knee replacement: a study protocol for a prospective, double-blinded, parallel-group randomized, clinical controlled trial of novel, personalized and conventional implants. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Oct 12;20(1):443. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2830-7.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
September 1, 2015
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
May 31, 2021
Study Completion (Anticipated)
May 31, 2021
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
November 7, 2017
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 9, 2017
First Posted (Actual)
November 13, 2017
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
February 4, 2019
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 1, 2019
Last Verified
February 1, 2019
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- R15053
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
Yes
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
Yes
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis, Knee
-
Istanbul University - CerrahpasaCompletedKnee Osteoarthritis | Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)Turkey (Türkiye)
-
Edin MešanovićCompletedOsteoarthritis | Osteoarthritis of the Knee | Osteoarthritis of Knee | Osteoarthritis of the Knees | Osteoarthritis (OA) of the Knee | Osteoarthritis Knee | Osteoarthritis in the Knee | Osteoarthritis of Knee JointBosnia and Herzegovina
-
Golden Jubilee National HospitalJohnson & Johnson; DePuy OrthopaedicsNot yet recruitingOsteoarthritis | Knee Osteoarthritis | Osteoarthritis (OA) | Osteo Arthritis | Osteoarthritis in the Knee | Osteoarthritis (Knee) | Osteo Arthritis of the KneeUnited Kingdom
-
Dr. David WassersteinSunnybrook Research InstituteRecruitingKnee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA) | Knee Osteoarthritis (OA)Canada
-
LifeBridge HealthMicroPort Orthopedics Inc.; Rubin Institute for Advanced OrthopedicsRecruitingKnee Osteoarthritis | Osteoarthritis, Knee | Knee Pain Chronic | Arthropathy of Knee Joint | Knee Disease | Osteoarthritis Knees Both | Osteoarthritis Knee Left | Osteoarthritis Knee RightUnited States
-
Lucas R. Cusumano, MDNot yet recruitingKnee Osteoarthritis | Knee Discomfort | Knee Pain Chronic | Knee Swelling PainUnited States
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentNot yet recruitingKnee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)United States
-
The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityChinese University of Hong Kong; Zhujiang HospitalNot yet recruitingKnee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)
-
University of MiamiNot yet recruiting
-
Kutahya Health Sciences UniversityActive, not recruitingKnee Osteoarthritis | Knee DiseaseTurkey (Türkiye)
Clinical Trials on NexGen
-
Young Hoo KimCompleted
-
Ewha Womans UniversityCompletedOsteoarthritisKorea, Republic of
-
Ewha Womans UniversityCompleted
-
Zimmer BiometCompletedOsteoarthritis | Rheumatoid Arthritis | Traumatic Arthritis | Polyarthritis | Collagen Disorders and/or Avascular Necrosis of the Femoral Condyle | Post-traumatic Loss of Joint Configuration | Moderate Valgus, Varus, or Flexion DeformitiesUnited States
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompleted
-
University of AarhusAarhus University Hospital; Zimmer BiometCompletedOsteoarthritisDenmark
-
Hvidovre University HospitalUnknownOsteoarthritis, KneeDenmark
-
Hvidovre University HospitalZimmer BiometUnknown
-
Zimmer BiometCompletedOsteoarthritis | Total Knee ArthroplastyUnited States, Canada
-
Rigshospitalet, DenmarkZimmer BiometActive, not recruiting