- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03342235
Excimer Laser Surgery for Anisometropic Amblyopia (ATS19)
Study Objectives To compare the efficacy and safety of surgical treatment (PRK) versus non-surgical treatment of anisometropic amblyopia in children who have failed conventional treatment due to non-compliance or non-response.
Synopsis of Study Design
The study consists of two phases:
- A Patching Run-In Phase during which all participants are treated for at least 8 weeks with continued refractive correction (with spectacles and/or contact lenses) and patching prescribed 42 hours per week (averaging 6 hours daily) until no further improvement over 2 consecutive visits at least 4 weeks apart or the vision no longer meets eligibility criteria.
- A Randomized Trial Phase, beginning after no further VA improvement in the patching run-in phase and qualifying amblyopia is still present, during which the participant is assigned to either surgery with PRK and patching prescribed 2 hours per day or to non-surgical treatment with continued refractive correction (with spectacles and/or contact lenses) and patching prescribed 2 hours per day.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 3 to <8 years
Best-corrected amblyopic-eye VA using the ATS single-surround HOTV letter protocol (ATS-HOTV) meeting the following criteria:
- If age 3 to <5 years, 20/80 to 20/800 (a re-test is required if the VA is 20/80)
- If age 5 to <8 years, 20/63 to 20/800 (a re-test is required if the VA is 20/63)
- Note: For participants who require a re-test (as specified above), the better of the test and re-test acuities must meet the eligibility criteria for the amblyopic eye and will serve as the enrollment VA.
Best-corrected fellow-eye VA meeting the following criteria by ATS-HOTV:
- If age 3 years, 20/50 or better
- If age 4 to 5 years, 20/40 or better
- If age 6 to 7 years, 20/32 or better
- Best-corrected inter-ocular acuity difference ≥ 3 logMAR lines by ATS-HOTV
Refractive error meeting the following criteria (based on a cycloplegic refraction that is not more than 4 months old):
- Refractive error in the amblyopic eye must be greater than the fellow eye.
- If the amblyopic eye is myopic, SE refractive error in the amblyopic eye between -3.00D and -12.00D, inclusive.
- If the amblyopic eye is hyperopic, SE refractive error in the amblyopic eye between +3.00D and +6.00D, inclusive, if <=1.00D of astigmatism in the amblyopic eye; and between +3.00D and +5.00D, inclusive, if >1.00D of astigmatism in the amblyopic eye.
- Astigmatism less than or equal to 3.50D in the amblyopic eye.
- SE refractive error in the fellow eye between -4.00D and +3.00D, inclusive, with no astigmatism limits.
- For participants 3 to <5 years of age, at least 5.00D of SE anisometropic difference between the two eyes by cycloplegic refraction; for subjects 5 to <8 years of age, at least 3.00D SE anisometropic difference
- No more than 3.00D of difference in cylinder power between the two eyes
- Target postoperative refractive error (if participant becomes eligible for randomization) must be achievable with PRK as defined in Table 3 and must be within 2.00D of the fellow eye.
- Prior to enrollment into the Patching Run-In Phase, must have had patching and/or optical penalization with atropine or Bangerter filters prescribed for at least 6 months and optical correction of refractive error prescribed for at least 6 months. Prior treatment does not have to be continuous. Compliance with prescribed treatment does not influence eligibility but the best effort at compliance is expected from both the patient and provider.
- Corneal thickness >500 microns (>510 microns within the previous 7 months, or corneal thickness between 500 and 510 microns within the last 2 months).
- Central corneal thickness must be enough to allow the treatment dose needed while leaving a residual corneal thickness of ≥ 375 microns.
- IOP ≤ 22 mm Hg within 7 months of enrollment
- Investigator believes that the participant has achieved maximum improvement in amblyopic-eye VA with conventional treatment.
- Investigator is willing to prescribe patching, and parent and child are willing to attempt patching for at least 8 weeks for 42 hours per week (averaging 6 hours daily) in the Patching Run-In Phase.
- No rigid gas permeable lens (including OrthoK) worn in the past 2 months
- Soft contact lens is currently worn, has been attempted within the past 4 months, or a contact lens fitting exam (paid for by the study) is scheduled or the investigator does the contact lens fitting on the same day as enrollment.
- Parent understands the protocol and is willing to accept randomization (if child meets eligibility criteria after Patching Run-In Phase).
- Parent has a phone (or access to phone) and is willing to be contacted by Jaeb Center staff or other study staff during the next 36 months.
- Relocation outside of area of an active PEDIG site for this study without the next 36 months is not anticipated.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Non-refractive ocular cause for reduced VA in the amblyopic eye (example: cataract, posterior staphyloma, extensive myelinated nerve fiber layer, optic nerve anomaly, macular scar, corneal opacity); or any cause of previous form deprivation.
- Prior penetrating ocular surgery or injury
- Prior strabismus surgery within 60 days preceding enrollment
- Diagnosis of collagen vascular disease, Marfan syndrome, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome or other disorder of collagen synthesis
Previous ocular condition that may predispose the eye to be treated for future complications, for example:
- Corneal disease (e.g., herpes simplex, herpes zoster keratitis, keratoconus or suspicion of keratoconus based upon family history, slit lamp exam, retinoscopy, or corneal topography (if able), recurrent erosion syndrome, corneal melt, or corneal dystrophy)
- Established diagnosis of glaucoma
- Any condition that, in the investigator's opinion, would interfere with or prolong corneal epithelial healing
- History of significant eye rubbing or dry eye symptoms
- History of retinopathy of prematurity resulting in macular ectopia
- Down syndrome (trisomy 21)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: SINGLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Surgical Group
Participants randomized to PRK surgery will be referred to a study surgical center.
The participant will have a preoperative exam within 7 days prior to surgery and surgery within 60 days after randomization.
Participants will continue prescribed 2 hours per day of patching between randomization and the day of surgery.
|
Subjects randomized to refractive surgery will be referred to one of six study surgical centers (surgical centers are listed in Appendix B) to have photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in the affected eye within 60 days after randomization.
Other Names:
Excimer Laser System for use in photorefractive keratectomy.
|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Non-surgical Control Group
For participants assigned to the non-surgical control group, patching will be prescribed for 2 hours per day with optical correction, and will continue until the 8-month primary outcome visit.
|
Patching prescribed 2 hours per day with continued refractive correction (with spectacles and/or contact lenses) as able.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity in the Amblyopic Eye
Time Frame: from randomization to the 8-month primary outcome visit
|
Treatment group comparison of the change in Best-Corrected ATS-HOTV VA (BCVA) in the amblyopic eye at 8 months after randomization. ATS-HOTV = ATS single-surround HOTV testing protocol |
from randomization to the 8-month primary outcome visit
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Randot Preschool Stereoacuity Outcomes by Treatment Group
Time Frame: At 8 months after randomization
|
The distribution of Randot Preschool stereoacuity at randomization and the 8-month primary outcome visit will be tabulated separately for each treatment group.
Change in stereoacuity from randomization to the 8-month visit will be tabulated for each group and compared between treatment groups using the exact Wilcoxon rank-sum test.
|
At 8 months after randomization
|
|
Refractive Error Outcomes in Surgery Group
Time Frame: At 7 months after randomization
|
The distribution of change in refractive error in each eye at 7 months after randomization will be tabulated with computation of descriptive statistics.
The difference between the 7-month refractive error and the target refractive error will be tabulated with computation of descriptive statistics.
|
At 7 months after randomization
|
|
Visual Acuity Outcomes
Time Frame: At 8 months
|
A point estimate and corresponding 95% confidence interval will be calculated for the mean change in BCVA for the amblyopic-eye 8 months after baseline, adjusted for minimization covariates of age and VA at baseline as well as anisometropia type (hyperopia, myopia).
The analyses will include data completed within the pre-specified analysis window for the 8-month visit after baseline and will follow a modified intent-to-treat principle as outlined for the primary analysis.
|
At 8 months
|
|
Distribution of refractive error outcomes
Time Frame: At 7 months after baseline
|
The distribution of refractive error outcomes at 7 months after baseline will be tabulated with computation of descriptive statistics.
|
At 7 months after baseline
|
|
Distribution in Randot Preschool stereoacuity level
Time Frame: at baseline and 8 months
|
The distribution in Randot Preschool stereoacuity level at baseline and 8 months after baseline and the change in stereoacuity for this interval will be tabulated and compared using a Wilcoxon signed rank test.
|
at baseline and 8 months
|
|
Visual Acuity Outcomes at 12 and 24 Months Post-surgery
Time Frame: at 12 and 24 months after surgery
|
The distribution of the level and change in BCVA in the amblyopic eye at 12 and 24 months after surgery will be tabulated by treatment group with computation of descriptive statistics.
|
at 12 and 24 months after surgery
|
|
Stereoacuity at 12 and 24 Months Post-surgery
Time Frame: at 12 and 24 months after surgery
|
The distribution of Randot Preschool stereoacuity and change in stereoacuity at the 12- and 24-month post-surgery visits will be tabulated separately for each treatment group
|
at 12 and 24 months after surgery
|
|
Refractive Error at 12 and 24 Months Post-surgery
Time Frame: at 12 and 24 months after surgery
|
The distribution of change in refractive error in each eye at 12 and 24 months after surgery will be tabulated by treatment group with computation of descriptive statistics.
The difference between the refractive errors at these visits and the target refractive error will be tabulated by treatment group with computation of descriptive statistics.
|
at 12 and 24 months after surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Chair: Evelyn A Paysse, MD, Baylor College of Medicine
- Study Chair: David K Wallace, MD, MPH, Duke Eye Center
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ANTICIPATED)
Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- ATS19
- 2U10EY011751 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Refractive Errors
-
Suzan A RattanCompletedRefractive Errors | Refractive SurgeryIraq
-
London School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineBritish Council for Prevention of Blindness; Tanzanian Society for the BlindCompletedUnder- and Uncorrected Significant Refractive ErrorsTanzania
-
Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Essilor InternationalRecruitingRefractive Error | AmetropiaUnited States
-
Chulalongkorn UniversityNot yet recruitingRefractive Errors
-
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.CompletedRefractive ErrorUnited States
-
Sun Yat-sen UniversityQueen's University, Belfast; Orbis; Aravind Eye Care System; Padmashree Dr. D.... and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
Asociación para Evitar la Ceguera en MéxicoTerminated
-
Alcon ResearchCompleted
Clinical Trials on Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK)
-
Assiut UniversityCompleted
-
Tabriz UniversityCompletedAstigmatismIran, Islamic Republic of
-
Assiut UniversityCompletedMyopia ≤ -6 Diopters or Myopic Astigmatism ≤ -4 DioptersEgypt
-
Walter Reed Army Medical CenterUnited States Naval Medical Center, San DiegoCompleted
-
Singapore National Eye CentreSingapore Armed Forces; Defence Medical Environmental Research InstituteCompleted
-
Bausch & Lomb IncorporatedCompletedAmetropiaPhilippines
-
Stanford UniversityCompletedAstigmatism | MyopiaUnited States
-
Assiut UniversityRecruitingCompare Corneal High Order Aberrations Before and After Stream Light Trans-PRK and Mechanical Photorefractive KeratectomyEgypt
-
University of UtahTerminatedTopo-guided LASIK and Photorefractive Keratectomy vs Wavefront LASIK and Photorefractive KeratectomySurgery | MyopiaUnited States