Excimer Laser Surgery for Anisometropic Amblyopia (ATS19)

May 18, 2020 updated by: Jaeb Center for Health Research

Study Objectives To compare the efficacy and safety of surgical treatment (PRK) versus non-surgical treatment of anisometropic amblyopia in children who have failed conventional treatment due to non-compliance or non-response.

Synopsis of Study Design

The study consists of two phases:

  1. A Patching Run-In Phase during which all participants are treated for at least 8 weeks with continued refractive correction (with spectacles and/or contact lenses) and patching prescribed 42 hours per week (averaging 6 hours daily) until no further improvement over 2 consecutive visits at least 4 weeks apart or the vision no longer meets eligibility criteria.
  2. A Randomized Trial Phase, beginning after no further VA improvement in the patching run-in phase and qualifying amblyopia is still present, during which the participant is assigned to either surgery with PRK and patching prescribed 2 hours per day or to non-surgical treatment with continued refractive correction (with spectacles and/or contact lenses) and patching prescribed 2 hours per day.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study is evaluating the efficacy of surgical treatment with PRK versus non-surgical treatment of anisometropic amblyopia in children who have failed conventional treatment. The primary analysis will be a treatment group comparison of the change in BCVA in the amblyopic eye at the 8-month primary outcome visit. For participants wearing a contact lens, the BCVA will be the visual acuity tested in the contact lens rather than in spectacles (or trial frames).

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 7 years (CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 3 to <8 years
  2. Best-corrected amblyopic-eye VA using the ATS single-surround HOTV letter protocol (ATS-HOTV) meeting the following criteria:

    • If age 3 to <5 years, 20/80 to 20/800 (a re-test is required if the VA is 20/80)
    • If age 5 to <8 years, 20/63 to 20/800 (a re-test is required if the VA is 20/63)
    • Note: For participants who require a re-test (as specified above), the better of the test and re-test acuities must meet the eligibility criteria for the amblyopic eye and will serve as the enrollment VA.
  3. Best-corrected fellow-eye VA meeting the following criteria by ATS-HOTV:

    • If age 3 years, 20/50 or better
    • If age 4 to 5 years, 20/40 or better
    • If age 6 to 7 years, 20/32 or better
  4. Best-corrected inter-ocular acuity difference ≥ 3 logMAR lines by ATS-HOTV
  5. Refractive error meeting the following criteria (based on a cycloplegic refraction that is not more than 4 months old):

    • Refractive error in the amblyopic eye must be greater than the fellow eye.
    • If the amblyopic eye is myopic, SE refractive error in the amblyopic eye between -3.00D and -12.00D, inclusive.
    • If the amblyopic eye is hyperopic, SE refractive error in the amblyopic eye between +3.00D and +6.00D, inclusive, if <=1.00D of astigmatism in the amblyopic eye; and between +3.00D and +5.00D, inclusive, if >1.00D of astigmatism in the amblyopic eye.
    • Astigmatism less than or equal to 3.50D in the amblyopic eye.
    • SE refractive error in the fellow eye between -4.00D and +3.00D, inclusive, with no astigmatism limits.
    • For participants 3 to <5 years of age, at least 5.00D of SE anisometropic difference between the two eyes by cycloplegic refraction; for subjects 5 to <8 years of age, at least 3.00D SE anisometropic difference
    • No more than 3.00D of difference in cylinder power between the two eyes
    • Target postoperative refractive error (if participant becomes eligible for randomization) must be achievable with PRK as defined in Table 3 and must be within 2.00D of the fellow eye.
  6. Prior to enrollment into the Patching Run-In Phase, must have had patching and/or optical penalization with atropine or Bangerter filters prescribed for at least 6 months and optical correction of refractive error prescribed for at least 6 months. Prior treatment does not have to be continuous. Compliance with prescribed treatment does not influence eligibility but the best effort at compliance is expected from both the patient and provider.
  7. Corneal thickness >500 microns (>510 microns within the previous 7 months, or corneal thickness between 500 and 510 microns within the last 2 months).
  8. Central corneal thickness must be enough to allow the treatment dose needed while leaving a residual corneal thickness of ≥ 375 microns.
  9. IOP ≤ 22 mm Hg within 7 months of enrollment
  10. Investigator believes that the participant has achieved maximum improvement in amblyopic-eye VA with conventional treatment.
  11. Investigator is willing to prescribe patching, and parent and child are willing to attempt patching for at least 8 weeks for 42 hours per week (averaging 6 hours daily) in the Patching Run-In Phase.
  12. No rigid gas permeable lens (including OrthoK) worn in the past 2 months
  13. Soft contact lens is currently worn, has been attempted within the past 4 months, or a contact lens fitting exam (paid for by the study) is scheduled or the investigator does the contact lens fitting on the same day as enrollment.
  14. Parent understands the protocol and is willing to accept randomization (if child meets eligibility criteria after Patching Run-In Phase).
  15. Parent has a phone (or access to phone) and is willing to be contacted by Jaeb Center staff or other study staff during the next 36 months.
  16. Relocation outside of area of an active PEDIG site for this study without the next 36 months is not anticipated.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Non-refractive ocular cause for reduced VA in the amblyopic eye (example: cataract, posterior staphyloma, extensive myelinated nerve fiber layer, optic nerve anomaly, macular scar, corneal opacity); or any cause of previous form deprivation.
  2. Prior penetrating ocular surgery or injury
  3. Prior strabismus surgery within 60 days preceding enrollment
  4. Diagnosis of collagen vascular disease, Marfan syndrome, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome or other disorder of collagen synthesis
  5. Previous ocular condition that may predispose the eye to be treated for future complications, for example:

    • Corneal disease (e.g., herpes simplex, herpes zoster keratitis, keratoconus or suspicion of keratoconus based upon family history, slit lamp exam, retinoscopy, or corneal topography (if able), recurrent erosion syndrome, corneal melt, or corneal dystrophy)
    • Established diagnosis of glaucoma
    • Any condition that, in the investigator's opinion, would interfere with or prolong corneal epithelial healing
    • History of significant eye rubbing or dry eye symptoms
  6. History of retinopathy of prematurity resulting in macular ectopia
  7. Down syndrome (trisomy 21)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Surgical Group
Participants randomized to PRK surgery will be referred to a study surgical center. The participant will have a preoperative exam within 7 days prior to surgery and surgery within 60 days after randomization. Participants will continue prescribed 2 hours per day of patching between randomization and the day of surgery.
Subjects randomized to refractive surgery will be referred to one of six study surgical centers (surgical centers are listed in Appendix B) to have photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in the affected eye within 60 days after randomization.
Other Names:
  • PRK Surgery
Excimer Laser System for use in photorefractive keratectomy.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Non-surgical Control Group
For participants assigned to the non-surgical control group, patching will be prescribed for 2 hours per day with optical correction, and will continue until the 8-month primary outcome visit.
Patching prescribed 2 hours per day with continued refractive correction (with spectacles and/or contact lenses) as able.
Other Names:
  • Patching

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity in the Amblyopic Eye
Time Frame: from randomization to the 8-month primary outcome visit

Treatment group comparison of the change in Best-Corrected ATS-HOTV VA (BCVA) in the amblyopic eye at 8 months after randomization.

ATS-HOTV = ATS single-surround HOTV testing protocol

from randomization to the 8-month primary outcome visit

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Randot Preschool Stereoacuity Outcomes by Treatment Group
Time Frame: At 8 months after randomization
The distribution of Randot Preschool stereoacuity at randomization and the 8-month primary outcome visit will be tabulated separately for each treatment group. Change in stereoacuity from randomization to the 8-month visit will be tabulated for each group and compared between treatment groups using the exact Wilcoxon rank-sum test.
At 8 months after randomization
Refractive Error Outcomes in Surgery Group
Time Frame: At 7 months after randomization
The distribution of change in refractive error in each eye at 7 months after randomization will be tabulated with computation of descriptive statistics. The difference between the 7-month refractive error and the target refractive error will be tabulated with computation of descriptive statistics.
At 7 months after randomization
Visual Acuity Outcomes
Time Frame: At 8 months
A point estimate and corresponding 95% confidence interval will be calculated for the mean change in BCVA for the amblyopic-eye 8 months after baseline, adjusted for minimization covariates of age and VA at baseline as well as anisometropia type (hyperopia, myopia). The analyses will include data completed within the pre-specified analysis window for the 8-month visit after baseline and will follow a modified intent-to-treat principle as outlined for the primary analysis.
At 8 months
Distribution of refractive error outcomes
Time Frame: At 7 months after baseline
The distribution of refractive error outcomes at 7 months after baseline will be tabulated with computation of descriptive statistics.
At 7 months after baseline
Distribution in Randot Preschool stereoacuity level
Time Frame: at baseline and 8 months
The distribution in Randot Preschool stereoacuity level at baseline and 8 months after baseline and the change in stereoacuity for this interval will be tabulated and compared using a Wilcoxon signed rank test.
at baseline and 8 months
Visual Acuity Outcomes at 12 and 24 Months Post-surgery
Time Frame: at 12 and 24 months after surgery
The distribution of the level and change in BCVA in the amblyopic eye at 12 and 24 months after surgery will be tabulated by treatment group with computation of descriptive statistics.
at 12 and 24 months after surgery
Stereoacuity at 12 and 24 Months Post-surgery
Time Frame: at 12 and 24 months after surgery
The distribution of Randot Preschool stereoacuity and change in stereoacuity at the 12- and 24-month post-surgery visits will be tabulated separately for each treatment group
at 12 and 24 months after surgery
Refractive Error at 12 and 24 Months Post-surgery
Time Frame: at 12 and 24 months after surgery
The distribution of change in refractive error in each eye at 12 and 24 months after surgery will be tabulated by treatment group with computation of descriptive statistics. The difference between the refractive errors at these visits and the target refractive error will be tabulated by treatment group with computation of descriptive statistics.
at 12 and 24 months after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Evelyn A Paysse, MD, Baylor College of Medicine
  • Study Chair: David K Wallace, MD, MPH, Duke Eye Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

June 1, 2020

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

March 1, 2022

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

March 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 27, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 9, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

November 14, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 20, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

In accordance with the NIH data sharing policy, a de-identified database is placed in the public domain on the PEDIG public website after the completion of each protocol and publication of the primary manuscript.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be made available after publication of each primary manuscript.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Users accessing the data must enter an email address.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Refractive Errors

Clinical Trials on Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK)

Subscribe