Effects of Nordic Walking in Parkinson Disease Patients (Walking)

November 21, 2017 updated by: Leonardo A. Peyré-Tartaruga, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul

Effects of Nordic Walking Training on Functional, Clinical and Biomechanics Parameters in Parkinson's Disease: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effects of a Nordic and free walking training program on clinical, functional and biomechanical parameters of gait, in people with PD.

Outcomes: Motor symptoms: Staging and severity of PD, balance, walking functional mobility, self-selected walking velocity, and rehabilitation index. Non-Motor symptoms: Cognitive function, depressive symptoms, and quality of life (QL). Outcomes Biomechanics: Kinematic parameters (spatiotemporal and dynamic stability of walking) and neuromuscular parameters (amplitude of the electromyography signal, initial and final activation threshold, activation time and co-contraction index, of the following muscles: Vastus Lateralis (VL), Biceps Femoris (BF), Tibialis Anterior (TA), Gastrocnemius Medialis (GM).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Introduction: Changes in clinical, functional and biomechanical parameters of gait are remarkable features in Parkinson's disease (PD). Such changes are disabling for the performance of daily living activities (DLAs) as they represent a high risk of falls and impair quality of life (QL) in this population. Although exercise is recommended as an effective model of therapeutic intervention, to minimize the symptoms of this disease, little is known about the effects of Nordic walking on motor and non-motor symptoms in patients with PD. Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effects of a Nordic and free walking training program on clinical, functional and biomechanical parameters of gait, in people with PD. Experimental Design: Randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT). Study Site: Physical Education School of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul and the Clinical Hospital of Porto Alegre, in Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Methods: The sample comprised 33 participants, aged above 50 years, of both sexes, with a clinical diagnosis of idiopathic PD, with the staging of 1-4 in the Hoehn and Yahr scale (H&Y). The participants received two types of intervention: Nordic walking training program (NW, n = 16) and free walking training program (FW, n = 17), during six weeks. Aiming to evaluate the effects of the training program, the participants underwent the tests in the following period: pre-training + pre-familiarization (T1); post-familiarization + pre-training (T2); post-training (T3).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

33

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Rio Grande Do Sul
      • Porto Alegre, Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil, 90690-200
        • Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria: volunteers aged over 50 years, of both sexes, with a clinical diagnosis of idiopathic PD and staging between 1 and 4 in Hoehn and Yahr Scale (H&Y).

-

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Show chronic pain or presence of a migraine or nausea in daily life;
  • History of labyrinthitis;
  • Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS);
  • The frequency of training below of 75%.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Nordic walking Experimental
Experimental: Nordic walking Training The total period of training was composed by 9-week of walking with poles, two sessions per week. The cycles were divided into four microcycles composed of three training sessions. Each training session took 60 min. Nordic walking aerobics training was used during the training period. These exercises were performed alternating volume and intensity. The training session was divided into three stages: (a) stretching, joint mobility, and heating; (b) main part (NW); (c) return to the calm and ultimate stretching.
Nordic walking Training the total period of training was composed by 9-week of walking with poles, two sessions per week. The cycles were divided into four microcycles composed of three training sessions. Each training session took 60 min. Free walking aerobics training was used during the training period. These exercises were performed alternating volume and intensity. The training session was divided into three stages: (a) stretching, joint mobility, and heating; (b) main part (FW); (c) return to the calm and ultimate stretching.
Free walking Training The total period of training was composed by 9-week of walking without poles, two sessions per week. The cycles were divided into four microcycles composed of three training sessions. Each training session took 60 min. Free walking aerobics training was used during the training period. These exercises were performed alternating volume and intensity. The training session was divided into three stages: (a) stretching, joint mobility, and heating; (b) main part (FW); (c) return to the calm and ultimate stretching.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Free walking
Free walking Training The total period of training was composed by 9-week of walking without poles, two sessions per week. The cycles were divided into four microcycles composed of three training sessions. Each training session took 60 min. Free walking aerobics training was used during the training period. These exercises were performed alternating volume and intensity. The training session was divided into three stages: (a) stretching, joint mobility, and heating; (b) main part (FW); (c) return to the calm and ultimate stretching.
Nordic walking Training the total period of training was composed by 9-week of walking with poles, two sessions per week. The cycles were divided into four microcycles composed of three training sessions. Each training session took 60 min. Free walking aerobics training was used during the training period. These exercises were performed alternating volume and intensity. The training session was divided into three stages: (a) stretching, joint mobility, and heating; (b) main part (FW); (c) return to the calm and ultimate stretching.
Free walking Training The total period of training was composed by 9-week of walking without poles, two sessions per week. The cycles were divided into four microcycles composed of three training sessions. Each training session took 60 min. Free walking aerobics training was used during the training period. These exercises were performed alternating volume and intensity. The training session was divided into three stages: (a) stretching, joint mobility, and heating; (b) main part (FW); (c) return to the calm and ultimate stretching.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Test Timed Up and Go
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 9 weeks
This teste evaluate the mobility functional in three meters of self-selected speed (TUGSS) or at forced speed (TUGFS)
Change from baseline at 9 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Locomotor Rehabilitation Index
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 9 weeks
The Locomotor Rehabilitation Index is a method of determining how close is the SSW compared to the Optimum Speed (Vopt).
Change from baseline at 9 weeks
Self-selected walking speed - SSWS
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 9 weeks
This outcome will be measure in test of walking treadmill
Change from baseline at 9 weeks
Optimal Walking Speed (OPT)
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 9 weeks
This outcome will be measure through of the registered image movement analysis using the three-dimensional motion analysis system (VICON) of the walking test on treadmill.
Change from baseline at 9 weeks
Quality of life (QoL)
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 9 weeks
The quality of life will be estimated using the World Health Organization Quality of Life. (WHOQOL-short domains: physical, psychological, social relationships, environment, and general quality of life) and (WHOQOL-Long domains: sensory abilities, autonomy, Past. Present and Future Activities, social participation, death and dying, intimacy, and general quality of life).
Change from baseline at 9 weeks
Cognitive function
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 9 weeks
This outcome will be measure for Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA).
Change from baseline at 9 weeks
Depressive symptoms
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 9 weeks
This outcome will be measure for the Geriatric Depression Scale - 15 item. The scale consists of 15 dichotomous questions in which participants are asked to answer yes or no in reference to how they felt over the past week (for instance, "Do you feel that your life is empty?," Do you feel that your situation is hopeless?). Scores range from 0 to 15 with higher scores indicating more depressive symptoms.
Change from baseline at 9 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Motor symptoms
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 9 weeks

This outcome will be evaluated using Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale. This Scale the clinician-scored monitored motor evaluation. Will be to considered 30% improvement in the Part III score hasbeen applied to define "responders. The score in each item ranges from 0 to 4, and the indicates greater impairment by the disease and the minimum, normality.

The 14 items in the motor vehicle (the numbering of which goes from 18 to 31).

Change from baseline at 9 weeks
Balance Dynamics
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 9 weeks
This outcome will be evaluated using Berg Balance Scale (BBS). This scale assessment of the individual's balance in 14 situations, representative of activities of the day to day, such as: stand up, get up, walk, to lean forward, to move, to turn, among others. The maximum score of a being reached of 56 points and each item has an ordinal scale of five alternatives ranging from 0 to 4 points, according to the degree of difficulty.
Change from baseline at 9 weeks
Balance Static
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 9 weeks
This outcome will be evaluated using area of center of pressure (cm), with average velocity (IN cm/s) and root mean square (RMS). Assessments using unique measurements with force plat.
Change from baseline at 9 weeks
Spatial Temporal Parameters
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 9 weeks
This outcome is measure a composite for: stride frequency (in Hetz), stride length (in meters), swing time (in second) and contact time (in second). This outcome will be measure through of the registered image movement analysis using the three-dimensional motion analysis system (VICON) of the walking test on treadmill at different speed of walking (SSWS, below and above of the SSWS), 3 minutes at each speed (in kilometros/hours).
Change from baseline at 9 weeks
Dynamics Stability
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 9 weeks
This outcome will be evaluated using the coefficient of variation (CoV) of the Spatial Temporal Parameters: stride frequency (In Hertz), stride length (in meters), swing time (in seconds) and contact time(in seconds) in of the walking test on treadmill at different speed of walking (SSWS, below and above of the SSWS), 3 minutes at each speed.
Change from baseline at 9 weeks
Anthropometric data
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 9 weeks
This outcome is a composite for: circumferences (in cm), height (in meters), body massa (in kilograms) and body mass index - BMI (weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2. This outcome will be measure with balance, stadiometer and anthropometric tape.
Change from baseline at 9 weeks
Electromyographic Parameters
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 9 weeks
This outcome is measure is a composite for: mean amplitude (in milivolts), onset (in seconds), offset (in seconds) and time of the signal and co-contraction (in seconds) of the muscles: vastus lateralis (VL), biceps femoris (BF), anterior tibial (AT) and medial gastrocnemius (MG) This outcome will be measured through Measuring the electromyographic activation during treadmill walking tests using an electromyograph. In of the walking test on treadmill at different speed of walking (SSWS, below and above of the SSWS), 3 minutes at each speed.
Change from baseline at 9 weeks
Parameters of Pendular Mechanism
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 9 weeks
This outcome is measure a composite for:(external, internal and total mechanical work, Wext,Wint and Wtot, respectively, Recovery. This outcome will be measure through of the registered image movement analysis using the three-dimensional motion analysis system (VICON) of the walking test on treadmill at different speed of walking (SSWS, below and above of the SSWS), 3 minutes at each speed.
Change from baseline at 9 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Leonardo A Peyré-Tartaruga, PhD, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

March 20, 2013

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

June 30, 2013

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

July 30, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 10, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 21, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

November 28, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

November 28, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 21, 2017

Last Verified

November 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease

Clinical Trials on Nordic Walking

Subscribe