Oral Dexmedetomidine vs Midazoam For Premedication

May 28, 2020 updated by: SULTAN KELES, Aydin Adnan Menderes University

Oral Dexmedetomidine vs Midazoam For Premedication And Emergence Delirium in Children Undergoing Dental Treatment

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of 2 µg/kg of oral dexmedetomidine (DEX) and 0.5 mg/kg dormicum as premedication among children undergoing dental procedures.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The study involved 52 children between 3-7 years of age, ASA I , who underwent full-mouth dental rehabilitation. The DEX group (n=26) received 2 µg/kg DEX in apple juice, and the control group (n=26) received 0.5 mg/kg midazolam in apple juice.

The patients' scores on the Ramsey sedation scale (RSS), parental separation anxiety scale, mask acceptance scale, post-anesthesia emergence delirium scale (PAEDS), and hemodynamic parameters were recorded. The data were analyzed using chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, student t test, and analysis of variance in SPSS.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

52

Phase

  • Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 7 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The inclusion criteria is age between 3 to 7 years and American Society og Anesthesiology (ASA) grade 1.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The exclusion criteria included congenital disease, DEX, propofol allergy, asthma, mental retardation and those children parents refuse to participate study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Dexmedetomidine
2 µg/kg Precedex
2 µg/kg oral
Other Names:
  • Dexmedetomidine
Active Comparator: Midazolam
0.5 mg/kg dormicum
0.5 mg/kg
Other Names:
  • Dormicum

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ramsey Sedation Scale
Time Frame: 45 minutes after premedication
Sedation level is evaluated due to patient behavior. 1= Patient is anxious and agitated or restless or both, 2=Patient is cooperative, oriented, and tranquil, 3=Patient responds to command only, 4=Patient exhibits brisk response to light glabellar tap, 5=Patient exhibits sluggish response to light glabellar tap, 6=Patient exhibits no response.A Ramsay sedation score '1' was considered as unsatisfactory and "≥ 2" was considered as satisfactory sedation.
45 minutes after premedication

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Parental Separation Anxiety Scale
Time Frame: Preoperative
Behavior of the child on seperation from the parents was assessed according to a four-point scale, i.e., the parental seperation anxiety scale (PSAS): 1= Easy seperation, 2=Whimpers but easily reassured, 3=Cries and cannot be easily reassured, but not clinging to parents, 4=Cries and clinging to parents. A PSAS score of 1 and 2 were considered as 'successful parental seperation'.
Preoperative
Mask Acceptance Score
Time Frame: Before induction

Mask acceptance was evaluated using a four-point scale, i.e., mask acceptance scale (MAS):

1=Excellent (unafraid, cooperative, and accepts mask easily), 2=Good (slight fear of mask , easily reassured), 3=Fair (moderate fear of mask, not calmed with reassurance), 4=Poor (terrified, crying, or combative). The score of 1 and 2 considered as 'satisfactory' mask acceptance.

Before induction

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sultan KELES, Dr., Adnan Menderes University Faculty of Dentistry Aydın

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 30, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 24, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 29, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

November 30, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 29, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 28, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Results

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Premedication

Clinical Trials on Precedex

Subscribe