- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03359967
Changes in Intrathoracic Impedance During Sacubitril/Valsartan Treatment (CHILISALT)
Changes in Intrathoracic Impedance During Sacubitril/Valsartan Treatment: CHILISALT Study
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Background Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) that are improving clinical outcomes in selected heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients also collect valuable diagnostic information from continuous monitoring of several physiological variables such as intrathoracic electrical impedance. Intrathoracic electrical impedance monitoring has been used as a tool to evaluate pulmonary congestion. Intrathoracic impedance is inversely correlated to pulmonary volume expansion and has been linked to cardiac filling pressures. Decreasing in intrathoracic impedance and -derived fluid indices such as OptiVol Fluid Index, has been shown to predict heart failure hospitalizations and all-cause mortality in patients with HFrEF. Furthermore, studies also have shown the usefulness of monitoring impedance to initiate timely interventions preventing decompensation.
In patients with symptomatic HFrEF, the PARADIGM-HF trial demonstrated that sacubitril/valsartan significantly reduced the primary endpoint of cardiovascular mortality and heart failure hospitalization, compared with enalapril. The rate of all-cause mortality was also significantly reduced. Subsequently, Sacubitril/Valsartan is recommended by current guidelines as foundational therapy for many patients with symptomatic HFrEF.
However as a natriuretic agent, effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan treatment on intrathoracic impedance and fluid index remains unclear.
Objective The CHILISALT Study aimed to explore the effect of angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition on intrathoracic impedance and fluid index values in HFrEF patients who were implanted with a device for cardiac resynchronization therapy and/or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD; Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN) allowing continuous measurement of intrathoracic impedance and OptiVol Fluid Index. Main outcome parameters are the change in intrathoracic impedanceand OptiVol Index values between baseline (before Sacubutril/Valsartan treatment) and, 14th and 28th days of Sacubutril/Valsartan treatment.
Material and Methods CHILISALT Study will designed as national, multicentre, non-interventional, observational, single arm cohort study. Study population will identified from dedicated CIED Clinics from participating centres. Patients will eligible if they had already taking Sacubitril/Valsartan for ≥2 weeks and had been implanted with CIED for ≥3 months. Additionally, eligible patients must have a CIED before Sacubitril/Valsartan prescription date. Due to descriptive (proof of mechanism) design of the CHILISALT Study a formal population volume calculation will not be made. However, after minimum 24 patients included an interim analysis will be done in terms of changes in impedance values and other related parameters between baseline and after Sacubitril/Valsartan treatment. An independent data monitoring committee will decide to enrol or to finalize the study according to main outcome variable distribution. Main outcome parameters are the change in intrathoracic impedance and OptiVol Fluid index values between baseline (before Sacubutril/Valsartan treatment) and, 14th and 28th days of Sacubutril/Valsartan treatment. As a tool to evaluate pulmonary fluid status, intrathoracic impedance measuring quantifies impedance changes. CIEDs measured intrathoracic impedance (ohms) using the RV-coil to can vector. Impedance-derived fluid index will obtained using a cumulative sum mathematical model that calculates the differences between impedance measured in ohms (measured impedance) and a reference impedance. OptiVol Fluid index will be expressed in ohm-days. It was demonstrated that the index value exceeded 60 ohm-days, the crossing of this threshold value predicted both increased morbidity and mortality. Other possible confounders such as change in body weight (kilogram), current diuretic dose (miligram per day), requirement of intravenous diuretic therapy (yes/no), and the change from baseline to 28th day of the treatment in the clinical summary score on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ; on a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating fewer symptoms and physical limitations associated with heart failure) is selected as secondary outcomes.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Contacts and Locations
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients will eligible if they had already taking Sacubitril/Valsartan for ≥2 weeks and had been implanted with CIED for ≥3 months. Additionally, eligible patients must have a CIED before Sacubitril/Valsartan prescription date.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients younger than 18 years.
- Patients who not taking or taking <2 weeks Sacubitril Valsartan
- Patients who had a CIED which not using OptiVol algoritm for impedance measurement.
- Patients with structural pulmonary disease
- Patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome who using a continuous positive airway pressure device
- Patients with CIED pocket abcess
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in intrathoracic impedance values (ohms) between baseline and 14th and 28th days of Sacubutril/Valsartan treatment
Time Frame: Baseline (1st day), 14 th day and 28th day. (Screening=-10 to -1 day, Enrollment (Baseline Visit), Visit 1 (14+/-2 days), Visit 2 (28+/-4 days)
|
Main outcome parameter is the change in intrathoracic impedance values (ohms) measuring with a CIED using its RV-coil to can vector between baseline (before Sacubutril/Valsartan treatment) and, 14th and 28th days of Sacubutril/Valsartan treatment.
(Baseline value minus 14th day value) (Baseline Value minus 28 th day value) (Ohms) ( Decreasing in intrathoracic impedance has been shown to predict heart failure hospitalizations and all-cause mortality in patients with HFrEF.
|
Baseline (1st day), 14 th day and 28th day. (Screening=-10 to -1 day, Enrollment (Baseline Visit), Visit 1 (14+/-2 days), Visit 2 (28+/-4 days)
|
|
Change in OptiVol Index Values (ohm-days) between baseline and 14th and 28th days of Sacubutril/Valsartan treatment.
Time Frame: Baseline, 14th and 28th days of Sacubitril/Valsartan treatment
|
Change in Optivol Index values (ohm-days) measuring with a CIED using its RV-coil to can vector between baseline (before Sacubutril/Valsartan treatment) and, 14th and 28th days of Sacubutril/Valsartan treatment.
(Baseline value minus 14th day value) (Baseline Value minus 28 th day value) (Ohm-days) Decreasing in intrathoracic impedance derived fluid indices such as OptiVol Fluid Index, has been shown to predict heart failure hospitalizations and all-cause mortality in patients with HFrEF.
|
Baseline, 14th and 28th days of Sacubitril/Valsartan treatment
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in body weight (kilogram)
Time Frame: Baseline, 14 th day and 28 th day
|
Differences in Morning Body weight (kilogram) at fasting state between baseline and 14 th, 28 th days of Sacubitril/Valsartan treatment.
|
Baseline, 14 th day and 28 th day
|
|
Change in cumulative diuretic dose (miligram per day)
Time Frame: Baseline, 14 th day, and 28 th day
|
Changing of personal, current cumulative diuretic dose ( Between baseline and 14 th, 28 th days of Sacubitril/Valsartan treatment)
|
Baseline, 14 th day, and 28 th day
|
|
Requirement of intravenous diuretic therapy
Time Frame: Baseline, 14 th day, and 28 th day
|
Requirement of intravenous a loop diuretic due to congestive status (inpatient and/or outpatient) (Admission times)
|
Baseline, 14 th day, and 28 th day
|
|
Change in the clinical summary score on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ).
Time Frame: Baseline, 28 th day
|
Change from baseline to 28th day of the treatment in the clinical summary score on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) (on a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating fewer symptoms and physical limitations associated with heart failure)
|
Baseline, 28 th day
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CH1HF
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
-
Xinjiang Medical UniversityNot yet recruitingChronic Heart Failure | Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF) | Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFPEF) | Heart Failure With Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFmrEF)China
-
IRCCS Policlinico S. DonatoAgenzia Italiana del FarmacoNot yet recruitingHeart Failure | Acute Heart Failure | Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF) | Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFPEF) | Heart Failure With Mildly Reduced Ejection FractionItaly
-
SateliaCentral Hospital, Nancy, FranceCompletedHeart Failure | Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFPEF) | Heart Failure With Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFmrEF)France
-
Linkoeping UniversityRecruitingHeart Failure With Reduced Ejection FractionSweden
-
Medical University of SilesiaRecruitingHeart Failure With Reduced Ejection FractionPoland
-
Beijing Anzhen HospitalThe First Hospital of Jilin University; Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang...Recruiting
-
Novartis PharmaceuticalsActive, not recruitingHeart Failure With Reduced Ejection FractionRomania
-
Wroclaw Medical UniversityNot yet recruitingChronic Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection FractionPoland
-
Heinrich-Heine University, DuesseldorfNot yet recruiting
-
Azienda Unita Sanitaria Locale di PiacenzaRecruitingHeart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF)Italy
Clinical Trials on Entresto tablet
-
Massachusetts General HospitalCompleted
-
Rehab WeridaTanta UniversityCompletedHeart FailureSaudi Arabia
-
Guangdong Provincial People's HospitalUnknownHeart Failure | Hemodialysis ComplicationChina
-
Mayo ClinicNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedHeart Failure With Preserved Ejection FractionUnited States
-
Novartis PharmaceuticalsCompleted
-
The Young Investigator Group of Cardiovascular...CompletedAcute Myocardial InfarctionEgypt
-
University Hospital, GrenobleRecruiting
-
Germans Trias i Pujol HospitalCompleted
-
University Hospital, MontpellierCompletedChronic Heart Failure | Sleep Apnea SyndromeFrance
-
Duke UniversityNovartis PharmaceuticalsCompleted