Validation of HaGuide Software Module Accuracy in Mapping STN Boundaries in Parkinson's Disease Patients Who Underwent DBS Procedure

November 30, 2017 updated by: Alpha Omega Engineering Ltd.

A Retrospective, Multi-Center, Clinical Validation of HaGuide Software Module Accuracy in Mapping Sub-thalamic Nucleus (STN) Boundaries in Parkinson's Disease Patients Who Underwent Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) Procedure

HaGuide version 1.0 (Neuro-Omega Ltd.) is a software module add-on to the FDA cleared Neuro-Omega System (K123796). It was designed to facilitate the use of Neuro-Omega's system by automatically mapping visually the depth of STN landmarks intra-operatively. HaGuide algorithm computes and displays the STN entry and exit, as well as introduces a detection of a distinct DLOR-VMNR boundary. HaGuide visual display is added to the UI and it is supplementing and not replacing the previously cleared standard display (visual and audio) of the system.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

103

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients diagnosed with Parkinson's Disease who underwent implantation of DBS electrode in the STN for the treatment of Parkinson's Disease, using the Neuro-Omega device for navigation and procedure's MER digital recorded data is available.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient was diagnosed with Parkinson's disease;
  2. Patient underwent implantation of DBS electrode in the STN for the treatment of Parkinson's disease, using the Neuro-Omega device for navigation;
  3. Procedure's MER digital recorded data is available;

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. DBS performed for any other movement disorder other than Parkinson's Disease including Parkinsonism;
  2. The recording has a high intensity of noise that will not allow re-analysis using the HaGuide software, in such cases the HaGuide software indicates that the signal is not valid for analysis;
  3. Missing data for primary end-point on the respective patient medical chart;
  4. The collected data that is used for the validation is with high step size resolution;

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
HaGuide version 1.0 software module
Patients diagnosed with Parkinson's Disease who underwent implantation of DBS electrode in the STN for the treatment of Parkinson's Disease, using the Neuro-Omega device for navigation and procedure's MER digital recorded data is available.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
HaGuide vs. Neurosurgeon measurements
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Percent agreement between HaGuide software measurements and expert Neurosurgeon/Electrophysiologist measurements
2 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
DLOR vs. VMNR
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Length (mm) of Dorso-Lateral Oscillatory Region (DLOR) vs. Ventro-Medial Non-Oscillatory Region (VMNR);
2 weeks
DLOR Entry/exit
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Entry/exit from DLOR (depth in mm)
2 weeks
STN Length
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Length of STN track (mm
2 weeks
DBS implant optimal track Identification
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Percent agreement in DBS implant optimal track Identification by percent agreement between HaGuide and Neurosurgeon choice of optimal track for DBS implant
2 weeks
Sites/Users comparison
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Sub-group analysis to determine the variation between sites by percent agreement between HaGuide software measurements and expert Neurosurgeon/Electrophysiologist measurements
2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: John A Thompson, Dr., University of Colorado, Denver

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

March 30, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

March 30, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 19, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 30, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

December 6, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

December 6, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 30, 2017

Last Verified

November 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease

Clinical Trials on HaGuide version 1.0 software module

3
Subscribe