Pedicle Screw Positioning With MySpine vs Free Hand Technique

August 18, 2020 updated by: Medacta International SA

A Prospective Clinical Survey on Accuracy of Pedicle Screws Positioning With MySpine Versus Free Hand Technique

Randomized clinical study in order to evaluate the accuracy of pedicle screw positioning during spine surgery performed with MySpine patient match positioning guide or Free hand technique.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The proposed study seeks to assess the intraoperative accuracy of the Medacta patient-specific MySpine® pedicle screws placement guides in comparison to free-hand technique.

A pre-operative CT scan of the spine is obtained to create a 3-dimensional model of the patient's spine for the MySpine patient group. This model is then used to preoperatively plan the patient's surgery implantation itself, with the same goals of both free-hand and computer assisted techniques. The theoretical advantage of this technique is accurate implant placement without the added surgical time and complexity of the procedure, with lower radiation exposure thanks to less steps of fluoroscopy checks.

The hypothesis for the present study is that the MySpine® technique can place pedicle screws more accurately in comparison to free-hand technique.

The accuracy of the final implant position with respect to the pre-operative planning will be evaluated through CT post-op analysis.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

29

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients older than 12 years
  • patients suffering from coronal or sagittal spinal deformities that will undergo a surgical treatment with a posterior approach and pedicle screws placement
  • Patients suitable to undergo spinal stabilization (according to the label indication/contraindications)
  • Patients who are willing and able to provide written informed consent for participation in the study. Written informed consent must be obtained when indication to surgery is confirmed.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with congenital spinal deformity (emeverebre, vertebra wedge, vertebrate butterfly, congenital bar, vertebra block)
  • Patients with a previous fusion of the spine in the region where screws will be inserted
  • Patients with any allergy to the device implanted
  • Patients who will be not able to provide their written consent to the study participation
  • Patients who are incapable of understanding and wanting

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: MySpine
Patients operated for spinal stabilization through patient specific pedicle screw guide "MySpine"
Other Names:
  • MySpine
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Free hand technique
Patients operated for spinal stabilization through standard free hand technique

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Positioning
Time Frame: 1 week after surgery
Pedicle screw accuracy is defined as having the entire screw contained within the cortices of each respective pedicle.
1 week after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Radiological Evaluation of Pedicle Screw Malposition
Time Frame: 1 weeks after surgery
A CT will be performed before discharge to evaluate the severity of pedicle screws malposition according to Gertzbein in grades 0, A, B or C, with grades 0 or A considered as "safe area.". Level 0 (perfect corrected positioning of the screw), level A (0-2 mm of violation), level B (2-4 mm of violation), level C (˃4mm of violation). The better outcomes correspond to level 0 and the worst to level C.
1 weeks after surgery
Occurrence of Malposition Side
Time Frame: 1 weeks after surgery
Evaluation of malposition on the medial or lateral side
1 weeks after surgery
Incidence of Adverse Event
Time Frame: intraoperatively, up to 1 week after surgery
Occurrence of intra-operative complications reporting
intraoperatively, up to 1 week after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 13, 2015

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

October 11, 2016

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

February 13, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 28, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 5, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

December 11, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 2, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 18, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • P05.005.01

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spinal Deformity

Clinical Trials on patient specific pedicle screw positioning guide

Subscribe