CancerLife: Patient-Driven Solution in Cancer Care

February 8, 2021 updated by: Saint John's Cancer Institute

Patient-Driven Solution in Cancer Care: Improving Outcomes Using a Digital Information and Communication Platform

The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of a digital information and communication platform (DICP) in improving outcomes in patients with cancer and their caregivers.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This is a nonblinded, randomized, controlled trial of a digital information and communication platform (DICP) in self-reporting and monitoring of cancer and cancer-treatment related symptoms compared with usual care

Patients initiating and/or receiving systemic treatment for cancer will be enrolled in a nonblinded, randomized, controlled trial of a DICP in self-reporting and monitoring of cancer and cancer-treatment related symptoms compared with usual care. The study will require one (1) study encounter for consenting purposes.

All participants entering their information on the registration page will be contacted by a study team member for informed consent. Eligible subjects who agree to participate in the study and sign the consent form will be will be screened for eligibility. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to two arms:

Arm A will be asked to download a mobile application called CancerLife. CancerLife is a patient facing messaging app that gives cancer survivors and caregivers the ability to update family and friends of their health status through their existing social networks and at the same collect psychosocial and symptom reports that can be shared with the patients care team. Participants will be provided with online or printed instructions on the use of CancerLife and receive a user guide that they can refer on demand. CancerLife is a stand-alone application that is NOT integrated into the patient's electronic health record and will NOT trigger symptom alerts to the treatment team. Participants will be instructed to use the after-visit instructions provided to them by their treatment team for any symptoms or conditions that will require an evaluation by a healthcare provider.

Arm B will receive usual care provided for in the clinics. Usual care may vary between institutions, practices, and providers. Usual care may consist of but is not limited to any combination of the following: history and physical examination, review of systems, distress screening, symptom assessment measures, and/or interval quality of life measures.

Participants in Arm A will be asked to register on CancerLife to start using the broadcasting feature of the app. In addition, they will be asked to complete a series of questions through CancerLife at baseline and every 3 months for up to 2 years. Participants in Arm A will also be asked to complete FACT-G, GAD-7, DST, and QQPPI at those timepoints.

Participants in Arm B will receive usual care provided for in the clinics. They will also be asked to complete the FACT-G, GAD-7, DST, and QQPPI at baseline and every 3 months for up to 2 years..

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Santa Monica, California, United States, 90404
        • John Wayne Cancer Institute at Providence Saint John's Health Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18 years
  • Diagnosis of cancer
  • Receiving systemic treatment (chemotherapy, biotherapy/immunotherapy, hormonal therapy) that is expected to continue for at least 3 treatment sessions (approximately 9 weeks) from the time of enrollment
  • Karnofsky Index ≥50%
  • Able to understand and sign informed consent
  • Owns and able to use an electronic communication device (smart phone, tablet, laptop, desktop) and answer simple self-report questionnaires on their own

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Relevant cognitive impairment
  • Participating in a therapeutic clinical trial
  • Unable to read and comprehend English language text

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: CancerLife
Arm A will be asked to download a mobile application called CancerLife. CancerLife is a stand-alone application that is NOT integrated into the patient's electronic health record and will NOT trigger symptom alerts to the treatment team. Participants will be instructed to use the after-visit instructions provided to them by their treatment team for any symptoms or conditions that will require an evaluation by a healthcare provider.
CancerLife is a patient facing messaging app that gives cancer survivors and caregivers the ability to update family and friends of their health status through their existing social networks and at the same collect psychosocial and symptom reports that can be shared with the patients care team.
No Intervention: Usual care
Arm B will receive usual care provided for in the clinics. Usual care may vary between institutions, practices, and providers. Usual care may consist of but is not limited to any combination of the following: history and physical examination, review of systems, distress screening, symptom assessment measures, and/or interval quality of life measures.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Self-Reported Symptoms
Time Frame: 2 years
Reduction in severity and occurrence of symptoms
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of Life (QOL)
Time Frame: 2 years
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G): subscale scores are added to derive total FACT-G score (0-108). The higher the score, the better the QOL.
2 years
Anxiety
Time Frame: 2 years
Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) scale: score is calculated by assigning scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3, to the response categories of 'not at all', 'several days', 'more than half the days', and 'nearly every day', respectively, and adding together the scores for the seven questions. Scores of 5, 10, and 15 are taken as the cut-off points for mild, moderate and severe anxiety, respectively. When used as a screening tool, further evaluation is recommended when the score is 10 or greater.
2 years
Depression
Time Frame: 2 years
Depression Screening Tool (DST): score ranges from 0-6, patient with scores of >3 should be further evaluated with other diagnostic instruments.
2 years
Emotional state
Time Frame: 2 years
Tone analyzer and sentiment analysis using IBM Watson
2 years
Quality of Physician-Patient Interaction
Time Frame: 2 years
Questionnaire on the Quality of Physician-Patient Interaction (QQPPI): 14 items with each item ranging from 1-5, higher scores indicating more favorable ratings
2 years
Emergency department visits/hospitalizations
Time Frame: 2 years
Frequency of emergency department visits/hospitalizations
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Santosh Kesari, MD PhD, Saint John's Cancer Institute
  • Principal Investigator: Marlon G Saria, PhD RN FAAN, John Wayne Cancer Institute at Providence Saint John's Health Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 15, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 7, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

January 7, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 7, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

December 13, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 9, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 8, 2021

Last Verified

February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • JWCI-17-1001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer

Clinical Trials on CancerLife

Subscribe