Video Feedback to Enhance Parental Mentalization

April 26, 2019 updated by: Fanny Leyton, Universidad de Valparaiso

Video Feedback Intervention to Enhance Parental Reflective Function in Primary Caregivers of Children With Severe Psychiatric Disorders. Feasibility Randomized Trial

The objective of this study is to implement a Video Feedback (VF) intervention to enhance Parental Reflective Function in primary caregivers of inpatient psychiatric children. Because there is no published research using VF with parents of children with severe psychopathology and in hospitalized context, this study is a pilot study.

The research will include a qualitative and quantitative study; it will take place in a public hospital in Valparaíso, Chile. In the qualitative study, participants will be six primary caregivers who received the intervention and three stakeholders from Child Unit. For caregivers a semi-structured interview will be applied to know subjective experience gained by intervention regarding the perceived satisfaction. For health professional also a semi-structured interview will be applied to collect information pertinent to the feasibility of performing such intervention. The information obtained from the interviews will be analyzed with Grounded Theory model.

The quantitative study will be conducted amongst all tutors of children aged between 6 and 14 hospitalized in a child psychiatry ward between August 2017 and December 2018. The expected sample size is 30 subjects in total; 10 for the control group and 20 for the experimental group.

A four module of Video Intervention Therapy (VIT) was designed, each module includes a (video recorded) play session and a group VF session.

The evaluation of the caregivers at the beginning of the intervention will include a psychosocial questionnaire, GHQ-12 , Five Minutes Speech Sample (FMSS) where RF will be codified, Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis - Structure Questionnaire (OPD.SQ). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire will be applied to children, in addition to the Children Global Assessment Scale, (CGAS). After every VF session a new FMSS, GHQ-12 and CGAS will be made. A follow-up will be performed three months after the beginning of the intervention with FMSS, GHQ-12 for caregivers and SDQ and CGAS for children.

To determine Effect Size and Intra Class Correlation, the results will be analyzed using a multiple linear regression.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

One of the challenges when a child is hospitalized is working with the family, there is an enormous evidence relating family factors with onset of psychopathology and pour outcomes in children. Usually treatment includes parental support or family therapy, but most parents attend to few sessions.

Mentalization is defined as the capacity to understand and interpret one's own behavior and those of others as an expression of mental states, such as feelings, thoughts, fantasies, beliefs and desires. Reflective function (RF) is the operational definition of mentalization. Parental mentalizing is considered to have important implications for the development of self-regulation in Children.

Video assisted therapy has demonstrated to be a powerful tool in promoting change in parent-child relationships with few sessions.

The present study

To assess a short program aimed at improving Parental Reflective Function (PRF) during the hospitalization of children and early adolescents admitted to a psychiatric unit, a randomized pilot psychotherapeutic intervention using video feedback has been designed as a clinical trial. There is ample evidence of the usefulness of video feedback to increase sensitivity and PRF in children up to 5 years, but in older children the evidence is limited. There are no known published randomized clinical trials using video feedback in parents of children admitted for psychiatric reasons.

A VF therapy like this will allow implementing a short and economic intervention, which has been used in older children and in parents with mental health problems, as is expected in parents of inpatient psychiatric children. This research also will contribute to explore how PRF relates to children psychopathology.

General objectives

  1. To assess the feasibility and acceptability of a psychotherapeutic intervention using video feedback in order to improve the PRF in primary caregivers of children and adolescents hospitalized in public inpatient unit.
  2. To provide data to estimate the parameters required to design a definitive Randomized Control Trial with a psychotherapeutic intervention using VF in order to improve the PRF in primary caregivers of children and adolescents hospitalized in public inpatient unit.

Method This project was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Valparaíso-San Antonio Health Service The research has the support of the head of the Child Psychiatry Unit and the Director of the Psychiatric Hospital.

Participants The research will take place in a public child/adolescent psychiatry ward in Valparaíso in "Hospital Psiquiátrico del Salvador"

In the qualitative study, participants will be a minimum of six primary caregivers of children hospitalized in a psychiatric ward receiving intervention between the ages of 6 and 14, as well as three key players (a therapist, a nurse and chief psychiatrist of the Special Care Unit).

The quantitative study will be conducted amongst all tutors of children hospitalized in a child psychiatry ward between August 2017 and December 2018. The sample will be all parents and/or caregivers that meet the inclusion criteria and wish to participate. The expected sample size is 30 subjects in total; 10 for the control group and 20 for the experimental group. If by December 2018 the total sample has not been met, more subjects will be recruited in order to achieve the sample size. A clinical essay having 30 subjects has been proposed because an intervention of these characteristics has not been performed in Chile; so the impact of the effect must first be estimated in order to assess the feasibility for a future multi-centric clinical trail. This is the reason behind piloting the present study.

Procedure

Qualitative study. Two semi-structured interview scripts will be performed.

  • One script aims to gain full grasp of the subjective experience gained by intervention participants regarding the perceived workshop satisfaction and follow-up.
  • The second script will be aimed at key institutional information holders, aiming to collect information pertinent to the feasibility of performing such an intervention. Questions will focus on analyzing the necessary resources needed and impact the workshop may have in the functioning of the child psychiatric ward.

The interviews will be performed by physicians undergoing a psychiatrist specialization and/or a psychologist who is not participating in the intervention.

Quantitative Study

At the onset of hospitalization, all caregivers meeting inclusion criteria must provide an informed consent form in order to participate in the study. Children must provide an informed approval after caregivers have provided their consent.

All caregivers that participate in the study will receive an array of instruments upon entering, subsequently randomized between the control groups and those intervened. If any mental health problem is detected in caregivers it will be made a referral for her or him to get special support according to the problem detected

Both groups of caregivers along with their child receive the same regular care and treatments they would normally receive from a inpatient unit. Since both groups will be subject to a larger intervention, the aim of a future randomized control trial will be to objectify how much VF boosts the improvement of PRF during a child's psychiatric hospitalization.

Intervention Interventions will be performed by the principal investigator and by a child clinical psychologist, both trained and supervised in Video Intervention Therapy (VIT). VIT is a technique for performing Video Feedback where behavior-oriented interventions and representational therapy elements are used. This provides a six-step video analysis framework. The video may be filmed at different settings, the only requirement being a visual interaction of the child with his parents.

A four module intervention was designed for this study, each module includes a play session and a VF session. The play session has a workshop format, it has a duration of 45 to 60 minutes, where the caregiver(s) plays freely with the child. During the play session, a five to ten minute video sessions of the dyads will be made. The therapeutic team will then pick approximately 1 minute long excerpts to display in the VF sessions. The VF sessions will occur during the same week and these could be group sessions.

Analysis plan

Qualitative Study The information obtained from the interviews will be analyzed with Grounded Theory model, obtained open codify data.

For the analysis the ATLAS.TI Software will be used, enabling managing and processing text data groups.

Quantitative Study

  1. A descriptive statistic will be performed to compare the control group and the intervened group regarding clinical and sociodemographic variables.
  2. It will be also presenting descriptive statistic on eligibility rate, recruitment rate, and compliance.
  3. To determine Effect Size and Intra Class Correlation results will be analyzed using a multiple linear regression, multi level model with randomized and fixed interception.

Quantitative data will be analyzed using STATA 14.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Chile
      • Valparaíso, Chile
        • Hospital Psiquiátrico del Salvador

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Figure as a tutor during hospitalization or,
  • Figure as the primary caregiver of the child or adolescent and,
  • Must have a (legal or biological) kinship with the hospitalized child or adolescent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Responsible adults that present a severe intellectual deficit or psychotic symptoms or,
  • Institutional caregivers or,
  • Parents that do not care for the child regularly (see the child lees than a week per month, has restraining orders, etc. )

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control Group
Patients in control group will attend to four session of Play Therapy plus inpatient treatment as usual during four weeks
Behavioral: Control Group
Play therapy will be administered once a week plus inpatient treatment as usual for 4 weeks
Other Names:
  • Treatment us Usual
Experimental: Video Feedback
Once a week, after play therapy, individual or group video feedback session will be done.
Behavioral: Control Group
Play therapy will be administered once a week plus inpatient treatment as usual for 4 weeks
Other Names:
  • Treatment us Usual
Behavioral: Video Feedback
first, a play interaction between the child and caregiver is recorded (5 to 10 minutes), then the therapist and caregivers watch together a selected part of the video (1 to 2 minutes) and provide feedback with a six step protocol.
Other Names:
  • Video Intervention Therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of delivering the intervention
Time Frame: Through study completion, approximately 18 months
Estimate the proportion of the quantity of performed sessions against the quantity of planned VF sessions.
Through study completion, approximately 18 months
Feasibility as measured by participant retention
Time Frame: Through study completion, approximately 21 months
Number of participants who remain in the study at the 12 weeks follow up
Through study completion, approximately 21 months
Feasibility of recruitment
Time Frame: Through study completion, approximately 18 months
Estimate the proportion of caregivers who meet eligibility criteria and accept the invitation to participate in the study (recruiting rate)
Through study completion, approximately 18 months
Acceptability as measured by compliance-to-intervention rate
Time Frame: Through study completion, approximately 18 months
proportion of caregivers that complete the intervention against the quantity of randomized.
Through study completion, approximately 18 months
Change over time in Caregiver's Parental Reflective Function
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), weekly during 4 weeks after allocation (T1, T2, T3, T4) and 12 weeks follow up (T5)
Parental Reflective Function is obtained from a general codification of the Five Minutes Speech Sample transcription according to the Reflexive Function Evaluation Manual with a scale that goes from -1 (avoidance or rejection of the mentalization) to 9 score points (complete or exceptional RF). A score of 5 reflects a clear understanding of mental states.
Baseline (T0), weekly during 4 weeks after allocation (T1, T2, T3, T4) and 12 weeks follow up (T5)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acceptability of the intervention by primary caregivers
Time Frame: Following completion of the intervention (4 weeks from allocation)
Satisfaction and related factors from the caregivers perspective that participate in the VF intervention, it will be assessed through a qualitative semi-structured interview
Following completion of the intervention (4 weeks from allocation)
Acceptability of the intervention by key stakeholders (a therapist, a psychiatrist and a nurse) of child inpatient unit
Time Frame: Through study completion, approximately 21 months
Acceptability of performing a novel intervention from health professionals it will be assessed through a qualitative semi-structured interview.
Through study completion, approximately 21 months
Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis - Structure Questionnaire (OPD-SQ) 12 item version
Time Frame: Baseline (T0)
OPD-SQ Auto report instrument that measures the level of structural integration of personality in 12 items, in which people indicate the degree to which they feel accurately described in a 5 point Likert scale. Higher scores are indicators of less structural integration.
Baseline (T0)
Change over time The General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) in Caregivers
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), weekly during 4 weeks after allocation (T1, T2, T3, T4) and 12 weeks follow up (T5)
The well-being of parents will be measured using a 12-question questionnaire to measure overall psychological well-being. Total scores range from 0 to 36. Higher scores indicate more psychological problems
Baseline (T0), weekly during 4 weeks after allocation (T1, T2, T3, T4) and 12 weeks follow up (T5)
Change over time in Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in Children
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), weekly during 4 weeks after allocation (T1, T2, T3, T4) and 12 weeks follow up (T5)
The parents' self-reported behavior using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), a 25-item questionnaire that assesses children's positive and negative attributes, each item uses a 3-point Likert ordinal scale. The answers have a score of 0-2 for the items written negatively and a reverse score of 2-0 for the items written positively. Thus, higher scores indicate more problematic attributes for all the 25 items
Baseline (T0), weekly during 4 weeks after allocation (T1, T2, T3, T4) and 12 weeks follow up (T5)
Change over time in Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGAS) in Children
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), weekly during 4 weeks after allocation (T1, T2, T3, T4) and 12 weeks follow up (T5)
Change in Severity of Psychopathology with Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGAS),
Baseline (T0), weekly during 4 weeks after allocation (T1, T2, T3, T4) and 12 weeks follow up (T5)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Universidad de Valparaiso

Collaborators

Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
University of Chile

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Fanny Leyton, Md, Hospital Psiquiátrico del Salvador. Universidad de Valparaíso

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 2, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 29, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

April 23, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 19, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 11, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

December 15, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 30, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2019

Last Verified

April 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 0020173081

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parenting

Clinical Trials on Control Group

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Uzbekistan

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe